Pummel (Red)
Generic Attack Reaction
Choose 1;
- Target club or hammer weapon attack gains +4 [Power].
- Target attack action card with cost [2 Resource] or greater gains +4 [Power] and "If this hits, the defending hero discards a card."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.454.450256319
Average Defense Value: Β
2.742.744586547
Hero
Bravo
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Terra
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Terra that play both.
New
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Kayo, Underhanded Cheat that play both.
Puffin, Hightail
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Puffin, Hightail that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Boots
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Civic Steps
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Tectonic Plating
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Nullrune Hood
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crater Fist
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Aurum Aegis
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Arcane Lantern
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Balance of Justice
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Ironrot Legs
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Crown of Dominion
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Well Grounded
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Face Purgatory
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Skullhorn
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Heart of Ice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Flick Knives
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Ironhide Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Flail of Agony
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Redwood Hammer
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Scepter of Pain
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.732.734964811
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.772.773082489
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714158026
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.662.661711189
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Cog in the Machine
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Cog in the Machine that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.822.816863768
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.782.781626383
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.738703868
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.792.786541245
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.776262142
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.785631765
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.748087969
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.747856451
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807416268
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.772.772776197
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.755534167
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.762.761586259
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.743946905
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.809271879
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.742.739088326
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.431.429730948
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Oaken Old that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.449139280
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.771321365
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.832.830559490
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.702.701540996
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547563605
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.537383714
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811398355
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.393491566
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.657714844
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Oblivion
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Oblivion that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pummel (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
