Erase Face
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When Erase Face hits a hero, cards and tokens they own lose all class and talent types until the end of their next turn.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.353.347546337
Average Defense Value: Β
2.582.577343903
Hero
New
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
New
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
New
Aurora, Shooting Star
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Dromai, Ash Artist
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Crown of Providence that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flick Knives
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Flick Knives that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Traverse the Universe
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Skullhorn
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Skullhorn that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Meridian Pathway
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Nullrune Hood
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Savage Sash
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Savage Sash that play both.
Mask of Momentum
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Tide Flippers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Tide Flippers that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Balance of Justice
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Balance of Justice that play both.
Mask of Perdition
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Nullrune Robe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Crown of Dominion
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Aether Ironweave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Skull Crushers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Skull Crushers that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Arousing Wave
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Arousing Wave that play both.
Waves of Aqua Marine
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Waves of Aqua Marine that play both.
Redback Shroud
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Redback Shroud that play both.
Silken Form
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Silken Form that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Mage Master Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Weapon
Nerve Scalpel
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Orbitoclast that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Mandible Claw
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Mandible Claw that play both.
Spider's Bite
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Scale Peeler that play both.
Star Fall
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Star Fall that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Romping Club
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Romping Club that play both.
Searing Emberblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Searing Emberblade that play both.
Storm of Sandikai
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Graven Call
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Graven Call that play both.
Action
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.702.695431472
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and The Weakest Link that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.692.687601516
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Rage Specter that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Restless Coalescence that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and This Round's on Me that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Energy Potion that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Sand Sketched Plan
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Sand Sketched Plan that play both.
Cast Bones
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Cast Bones that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Astral Etchings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Astral Etchings (Red) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Force of Nature
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Force of Nature that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Passing Mirage that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Vengeful Apparition (Blue) that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.762.757041164
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.802.798943843
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
2.802.795783926
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Send Packing that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Swing Big that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
2.782.778546713
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Shake Down that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Beast Within that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746113990
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.721518987
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Skull Crack that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Already Dead that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.498657117
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Humble (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Infect (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Eradicate that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β
2.482.481410256
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Amnesia that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Reincarnate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Reincarnate (Yellow) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Runner Runner that play both.
Show No Mercy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Show No Mercy that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Infiltrate that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Lava Burst that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Run Roughshod that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Riled Up (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Riled Up (Yellow) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Fry (Red) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Second Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Chase the Tail that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Double Strike that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Plunder the Poor (Blue) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Salt the Wound that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.654038599
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Concealed Blade that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Siren's Call that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834403515
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.772.774165202
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β
2.382.380006307
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Reckless Swing that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
2.612.605874317
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and That All You Got? that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Hold the Line that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Path Well Traveled that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Remembrance that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.639091174
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Art of War that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.495654273
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
No Fear
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and No Fear that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Erase Face and Plague Hive that play both.