Ink-lined Cloak
Wizard Equipment - Chest
Instant -- Destroy this: Gain {r}. Activate this only if you control an aura permanent with Sigil in its name.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.641.644892750
Average Defense Value:
2.482.475709094
Hero
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Oscilio
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Oscilio that play both.
Verdance
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Verdance that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Equipment
Flash of Brilliance
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Hold Focus
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Hold Focus that play both.
Lightning Greaves
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Twinkle Toes
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Twinkle Toes that play both.
Storm Striders
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Nullrune Hood
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Well Grounded
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Well Grounded that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Shock Charmers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Shock Charmers that play both.
Weapon
Action
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.468292683
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played:
2.432.429467085
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.459459459
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.373134328
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Flash (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.432989691
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Etchings of Arcana (Yellow) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.314465409
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.305194805
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.426900585
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.356643357
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.291666667
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
2.522.521126761
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Mind Warp that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.314285714
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.465517241
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.392.390243902
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
2.082.075757576
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Sigil of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Fyendal that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Perennial Aetherbloom (Red) that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Glyph Overlay (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Swell Tidings that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue) that play both.
Channel Thunder Steppe
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Channel Thunder Steppe that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Glyph Overlay (Yellow) that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.451807229
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.484567901
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.444029851
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Fry (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.440366972
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
2.482.483091787
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
2.542.543589744
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.473333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Current Funnel that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.439655172
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.592.594202899
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blast to Oblivion (Yellow) that play both.
Lightning Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Form (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blast to Oblivion (Blue) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
2.492.488778055
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played:
2.372.366047745
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
2.532.534534535
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.421524664
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played:
2.362.358208955
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
Blink
Avg. played:
2.582.580952381
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blink that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played:
2.342.337349398
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.513636364
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
2.522.515463918
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
High Voltage
Avg. played:
2.322.322404372
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and High Voltage that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Kindle that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.557377049
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Will of Arcana that play both.