banner
New
Ink-lined Cloak
142 decks (0.03272%)
Price History
Ink-lined Cloak
Wizard Equipment - Chest
Instant -- Destroy this: Gain {r}. Activate this only if you control an aura permanent with Sigil in its name.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.581.583805950
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.492.489251049
Hero
New
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
New
Oscilio
Oscilio
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Oscilio that play both.
New
Verdance
Verdance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Verdance that play both.
Equipment
New
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
New
Flash of Brilliance
Flash of Brilliance
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
New
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Greaves that play both.
New
Hold Focus
Hold Focus
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Hold Focus that play both.
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Storm Striders that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Crown of Providence that play both.
New
Twinkle Toes
Twinkle Toes
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Twinkle Toes that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Shock Charmers
Shock Charmers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Shock Charmers that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Balance of Justice that play both.
New
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Well Grounded that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Nullrune Hood that play both.
New
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
New
Helm of Lignum Vitae
Helm of Lignum Vitae
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Weapon
New
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
New
Staff of Verdant Shoots
Staff of Verdant Shoots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Action
New
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
New
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.488636364
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
New
Comet Storm - Shock
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.480519481
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
New
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.339622642
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.339622642
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Flash (Red)
Flash (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.326530612
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Flash (Red) that play both.
New
Destructive Aethertide
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.659574468
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
New
Exploding Aether (Red)
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.282051282
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Mind Warp
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.586956522
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Mind Warp that play both.
New
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.520000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
New
Etchings of Arcana (Yellow)
Etchings of Arcana (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Etchings of Arcana (Yellow) that play both.
New
Arcane Twining (Red)
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.314285714
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
New
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
New
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.461538462
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
New
Eternal Inferno
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.322580645
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Swell Tidings that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
New
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Channel Thunder Steppe
Channel Thunder Steppe
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.578947368
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Channel Thunder Steppe that play both.
New
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Perennial Aetherbloom (Red) that play both.
New
Glyph Overlay (Blue)
Glyph Overlay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Glyph Overlay (Blue) that play both.
New
Sigil of Fyendal
Sigil of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Fyendal that play both.
New
Sigil of Earth
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Earth that play both.
New
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.470588235
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
New
Pop the Bubble (Red)
Pop the Bubble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Pop the Bubble (Red) that play both.
New
Arcane Twining (Yellow)
Arcane Twining (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcane Twining (Yellow) that play both.
New
Glyph Overlay (Yellow)
Glyph Overlay (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Glyph Overlay (Yellow) that play both.
New
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510638298
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
New
Gone in a Flash
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619718310
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Gone in a Flash that play both.
New
Eclectic Magnetism
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.602941176
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
New
Flittering Charge (Red)
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.493827160
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.432835821
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Fry (Red) that play both.
New
Current Funnel
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.612244898
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Current Funnel that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.431372549
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
New
Second Strike (Red)
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.468750000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
New
Blast to Oblivion (Blue)
Blast to Oblivion (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blast to Oblivion (Blue) that play both.
New
Blast to Oblivion (Yellow)
Blast to Oblivion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blast to Oblivion (Yellow) that play both.
New
Lightning Form (Red)
Lightning Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.526315789
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Form (Red) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
New
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Instant
New
Sigil of Brilliance
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.579439252
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
New
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.526785714
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
New
Sigil of Aether
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.590909091
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Aether that play both.
New
Sigil of Conductivity
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.377551020
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
New
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.637681159
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Blink
Blink
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.672131148
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blink that play both.
New
Sigil of Forethought
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
New
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.387755102
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
New
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.557692308
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
New
High Voltage
High Voltage
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.543478261
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and High Voltage that play both.
New
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.533333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Kindle
Kindle
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.633333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Kindle that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.517241379
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Resource
New
Will of Arcana
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Will of Arcana that play both.