Ink-lined Cloak
Wizard Equipment - Chest
Instant -- Destroy this: Gain {r}. Activate this only if you control an aura permanent with Sigil in its name.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.701.695605483
Average Defense Value:
2.462.464261899
Hero
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Oscilio
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Oscilio that play both.
Verdance
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Verdance that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Equipment
Flash of Brilliance
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Hold Focus
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Hold Focus that play both.
Lightning Greaves
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Helmsman's Peak
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Helmsman's Peak that play both.
Old Knocker
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Old Knocker that play both.
Twinkle Toes
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Twinkle Toes that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Storm Striders that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Metacarpus Node
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Well Grounded
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Well Grounded that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Crown of Providence that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Shock Charmers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Shock Charmers that play both.
Weapon
Action
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.519933555
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Ring of Roses
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Ring of Roses that play both.
Burn Bare
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Burn Bare that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played:
2.512.509473684
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.352808989
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.432727273
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Etchings of Arcana (Yellow) that play both.
Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.401574803
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Flash (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.336363636
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.374449339
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.424892704
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
2.602.598214286
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Mind Warp that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.371428571
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.321212121
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.297872340
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
2.162.164102564
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.520270270
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.402.398373984
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.462.460784314
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Fyendal that play both.
Channel Thunder Steppe
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Channel Thunder Steppe that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Perennial Aetherbloom (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue) that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Glyph Overlay (Blue) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Glyph Overlay (Yellow) that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.537974684
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.494824017
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.470000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Fry (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.469841270
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
2.602.596296296
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
2.552.547368421
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
2.582.576190476
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Current Funnel that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.529761905
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.532.529411765
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blast to Oblivion (Yellow) that play both.
Lightning Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Form (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blast to Oblivion (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.546511628
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
2.532.532646048
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
2.592.588983051
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played:
2.532.531791908
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.576470588
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Blink
Avg. played:
2.632.629032258
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Blink that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.487179487
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played:
2.382.377464789
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played:
2.642.642857143
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Calming Breeze that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played:
2.392.387900356
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
banned - Blitz
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
2.632.625000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
High Voltage
Avg. played:
2.632.625531915
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and High Voltage that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.451612903
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played:
2.532.530726257
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.573913043
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Kindle that play both.
Resource
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ink-lined Cloak and Will of Arcana that play both.