Lightning Press (Red)
Generic Instant
Target attack action card with cost 1 or less gains +3 [Power].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.602.601118012
Average Defense Value:
2.452.451091157
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Aurora, Shooting Star
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Aurora
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Aurora that play both.
Lexi
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Lexi that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Lexi, Livewire
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Lexi, Livewire that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Briar
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Briar that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Equipment
Lightning Greaves
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Crown of Providence
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Shock Charmers
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Old Knocker
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Aether Ironweave
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Face Purgatory
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
New Horizon
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and New Horizon that play both.
Balance of Justice
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Perch Grapplers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Crown of Dominion
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Nullrune Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quiver of Rustling Leaves
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Quiver of Rustling Leaves that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Spell Fray Tiara
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Spell Fray Tiara that play both.
Sealace Sarong
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Zap Clappers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Zap Clappers that play both.
Heart of Ice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Star Fall
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Voltaire, Strike Twice
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Voltaire, Strike Twice that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Death Dealer
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Death Dealer that play both.
Action
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
2.832.826191323
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played:
2.822.820755552
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.669005848
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Flicker Wisp
Avg. played:
2.672.669781521
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Flicker Wisp that play both.
Skyward Serenade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Skyward Serenade that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Three of a Kind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Three of a Kind that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Written in the Stars
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Written in the Stars that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Electrify (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.542.543651887
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Electrify (Blue) that play both.
Arctic Incarceration (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.436657682
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Arctic Incarceration (Red) that play both.
Ice Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Ice Quake (Red) that play both.
Electrify (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.479312540
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Electrify (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.487280545
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Force of Nature
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Attack Action
Call for Backup
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Call for Backup that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.807246377
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
2.832.834982047
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
2.832.825691493
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Current Funnel that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.662371270
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.728846031
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.729740311
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.670659859
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.729376149
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.752.752506635
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.740514529
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.693673987
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.828134433
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Swift Shot
Avg. played:
2.432.426966292
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Swift Shot that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.659022222
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Exude Confidence
Avg. played:
2.732.726569550
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played:
2.412.414285714
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Skyzyk
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Skyzyk that play both.
Heaven's Claws (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.687416999
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Heaven's Claws (Blue) that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.733295151
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Endless Arrow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Endless Arrow that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.533204288
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.642.637141228
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Drill Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Drill Shot (Red) that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow) that play both.
Heat Seeker
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Heat Seeker that play both.
Frost Lock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Frost Lock that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Blue) that play both.
Searing Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Searing Shot (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
Chilling Icevein (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Chilling Icevein (Red) that play both.
Lightning Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Lightning Form (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Infecting Shot (Blue) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Yellow) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
2.542.544428773
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Pathing Helix (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Pathing Helix (Red) that play both.
Photon Rush (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Photon Rush (Red) that play both.
Remorseless
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Remorseless that play both.
Chilling Icevein (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Chilling Icevein (Yellow) that play both.
Falcon Wing (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Falcon Wing (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Fatigue Shot (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Fatigue Shot (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.552.548496605
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.797472321
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.733422539
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Block
Return Fire
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Return Fire that play both.
Instant
banned - Blitz
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
2.852.845186226
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.805964888
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.713177248
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
2.762.761606444
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Blink
Avg. played:
2.782.783898305
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Blink that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played:
2.792.786858974
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Rain Razors
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Rain Razors that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.688431512
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played:
2.552.554471545
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Pulse of Volthaven
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Pulse of Volthaven that play both.
High Voltage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and High Voltage that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played:
2.512.512118019
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Poison the Well
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lightning Press (Red) and Poison the Well that play both.