banner
Nimblism (Blue)
2254 decks (0.3111%)
Price History
Nimblism (Blue)
Generic Action
The next attack action card with cost [1 Resource] or less you play this turn gains +1 [Power]. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.932.926502390
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.452.451919139
Hero
New
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Kayo, Underhanded Cheat that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Skullhorn that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Savage Sash that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Booze! that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.613305613
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Argh... Smash! that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.430921053
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.686602871
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β 
1.771.774647887
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
New
Cruel Ambition
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.447552448
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Cruel Ambition that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.601532567
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Nimblism (Yellow)
Nimblism (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimblism (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
New
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Show of Strength that play both.
New
Outside Interference
Outside Interference
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Outside Interference that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.879452055
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
New
Big Bully
Big Bully
Avg. played: Β 
1.881.876570584
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Big Bully that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Swing Big that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.905586153
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.547058824
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.347222222
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
New
Flex Strength (Blue)
Flex Strength (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.693317422
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Flex Strength (Blue) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.298274445
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Overcrowded that play both.
New
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Red)
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bask in Your Own Greatness (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.461604832
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
New
Offensive Behavior
Offensive Behavior
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.345165239
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Offensive Behavior that play both.
New
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bully Tactics that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.704500978
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
New
The Old Switcheroo
The Old Switcheroo
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and The Old Switcheroo that play both.
Rotten Remains
Rotten Remains
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rotten Remains that play both.
New
Tear Down the Idols
Tear Down the Idols
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Tear Down the Idols that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.378446115
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.286082474
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.761.765000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue) that play both.
Outed
Outed
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Outed that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Give and Take that play both.
New
Goon Beatdown
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Goon Beatdown that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Blue)
Looking for a Scrap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Looking for a Scrap (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.162.156862745
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560669456
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Send Packing that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
New
Gang Robbery
Gang Robbery
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Gang Robbery that play both.
Overload (Blue)
Overload (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Overload (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.911.914285714
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.887399464
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.900688299
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.532293987
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
New
Steal Victory
Steal Victory
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.921725240
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Steal Victory that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.676413255
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.467166979
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Poison the Well
Poison the Well
Avg. played: Β 
1.811.812734082
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Poison the Well that play both.
New
Arrogant Showboating
Arrogant Showboating
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arrogant Showboating that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
1.971.972440945
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Yellow)
Sigil of Solace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Yellow) that play both.
New
Concealed Object
Concealed Object
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Concealed Object that play both.