Nimblism (Blue)
Generic Action
The next attack action card with cost [1 Resource] or less you play this turn gains +1 [Power].
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.312.310954868
Average Defense Value: Β
2.402.395037291
Hero
Scurv, Stowaway
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Briar
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Briar that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Aurora
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Aurora that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Riptide
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Riptide that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Chane that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Katsu
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Katsu that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Aether Ironweave
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Nullrune Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Robe
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blossom of Spring
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Ironrot Helm
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Quick Clicks
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Quick Clicks that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Breaking Scales
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Bracers of Belief
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bracers of Belief that play both.
Crown of Providence
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Mask of Momentum
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Tide Flippers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Toxic Tips
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Wizened Whiskers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mask of Wizened Whiskers that play both.
Arousing Wave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Arcane Lantern
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Deep Blue
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Crown of Dominion
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Flick Knives
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Cracker Jax
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Cracker Jax that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Spider's Bite
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Action
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.172.172910663
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.951.950617284
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimblism (Yellow) that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Dual Threat that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Come to Fight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Come to Fight (Blue) that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scout the Periphery (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.442.444444444
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Electrify (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Electrify (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Bramble Spark (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Blue) that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Riggermortis that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Attack Action
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.539682540
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
2.682.676470588
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.112.112244898
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.262500000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.232.228346457
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.631578947
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.622.618421053
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.461538462
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Overload (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Overload (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Vigor Rush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Vigor Rush (Red) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimble Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.458333333
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Wounding Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Wounding Blow (Red) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimble Strike (Blue) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Head Jab (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sea Legs that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Leg Tap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Leg Tap (Red) that play both.
Wounding Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Wounding Blow (Blue) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Give and Take that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Head Jab (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Head Jab (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.268965517
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.346774194
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.612.611111111
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.