Nimblism (Blue)
Generic Action
The next attack action card with cost [1 Resource] or less you play this turn gains +1 [Power].
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.262.255190233
Average Defense Value: Β
2.412.410580531
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Nuu
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nuu that play both.
Aurora
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Aurora that play both.
Briar
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Briar that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Riptide
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Riptide that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Chane that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Katsu
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Katsu that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Viserai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Viserai that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Aether Ironweave
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Nullrune Hood
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Robe
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blossom of Spring
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Runehold Release
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Runehold Release that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Ironrot Helm
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Arousing Wave
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Mask of Wizened Whiskers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mask of Wizened Whiskers that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Toxic Tips
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Bracers of Belief
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bracers of Belief that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Breaking Scales
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Aqua Seeing Shell
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Aqua Seeing Shell that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Crown of Providence
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tide Flippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Deep Blue
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Heirloom of Snake Hide
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Heirloom of Snake Hide that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Ebon Fold
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Cracker Jax
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Cracker Jax that play both.
Arcane Lantern
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Ironrot Plate
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ironrot Plate that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Koi Blessed Kimono
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Koi Blessed Kimono that play both.
Skybody Keikoi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Skybody Keikoi that play both.
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Driftwood Quiver
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Driftwood Quiver that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Weapon
Rosetta Thorn
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Spider's Bite
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Redwood Hammer
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.052.053435115
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Nimblism (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.711.711711712
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimblism (Yellow) that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scout the Periphery (Red) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Come to Fight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Come to Fight (Blue) that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Electrify (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Electrify (Red) that play both.
Bramble Spark (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played: Β
1.451.454545455
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and First Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Untamed (Red) that play both.
Electrify (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Electrify (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcane Cussing (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcane Cussing (Yellow) that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Call to the Grave that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Truce that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Moon
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and First Tenet of Chi: Moon that play both.
First Tenet of Chi: Tide
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and First Tenet of Chi: Tide that play both.
Emissary of Tides
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Emissary of Tides that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
Electrify (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Electrify (Yellow) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Attack Action
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.032.030864198
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.192.186046512
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Photon Rush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Photon Rush (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Second Strike (Blue) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Overload (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Overload (Red) that play both.
Vigor Rush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Vigor Rush (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mind's Desire (Blue) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimble Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Impulsive Desire (Blue) that play both.
Wounding Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Wounding Blow (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Head Jab (Blue) that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Leg Tap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Leg Tap (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Head Jab (Red) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimble Strike (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bounding Demigon (Blue) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hit the High Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hocus Pocus (Blue) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hocus Pocus (Yellow) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Yellow) that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Smash Up that play both.
Fry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fry (Blue) that play both.
Trip the Light Fantastic (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Trip the Light Fantastic (Blue) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Current Funnel that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Falcon Wing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Falcon Wing (Red) that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Wounding Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Wounding Blow (Blue) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Push the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Push the Point (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rift Bind (Blue) that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rising Knee Thrust (Red) that play both.
Leg Tap (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Leg Tap (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.212.206896552
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Blue) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Lunging Press that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Evasive Leap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Evasive Leap (Red) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.