banner
Nimblism (Blue)
2563 decks (0.3493%)
Price History
Nimblism (Blue)
Generic Action
The next attack action card with cost [1 Resource] or less you play this turn gains +1 [Power]. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.952.949127223
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.462.455953802
Hero
New
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Kayo, Underhanded Cheat that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Skullhorn that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Savage Sash that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Action
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.931818182
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Booze! that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Argh... Smash! that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.618867925
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.427469136
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.694805195
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β 
1.771.767567568
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
New
Cruel Ambition
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.479166667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Cruel Ambition that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.589403974
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Nimblism (Yellow)
Nimblism (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimblism (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.938403520
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
New
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Show of Strength that play both.
New
Outside Interference
Outside Interference
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Outside Interference that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870533099
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
New
Big Bully
Big Bully
Avg. played: Β 
1.871.865746550
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Big Bully that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Swing Big that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.894347241
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.532956685
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.366089965
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.273106324
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Overcrowded that play both.
New
Flex Strength (Blue)
Flex Strength (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.647460938
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Flex Strength (Blue) that play both.
New
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Red)
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bask in Your Own Greatness (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.472794118
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
New
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bully Tactics that play both.
New
Offensive Behavior
Offensive Behavior
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.296487603
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Offensive Behavior that play both.
Rotten Remains
Rotten Remains
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Rotten Remains that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.651960784
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
New
Tear Down the Idols
Tear Down the Idols
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Tear Down the Idols that play both.
New
The Old Switcheroo
The Old Switcheroo
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and The Old Switcheroo that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.403441683
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.298876404
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.761.758314856
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue) that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Give and Take that play both.
Outed
Outed
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Outed that play both.
New
Goon Beatdown
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Goon Beatdown that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Blue)
Looking for a Scrap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Looking for a Scrap (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.142.141921397
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.565217391
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Send Packing that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Overload (Blue)
Overload (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Overload (Blue) that play both.
New
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.941.942017474
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.878665900
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.883859949
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.530651341
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
New
Steal Victory
Steal Victory
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.909952607
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Steal Victory that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.658703072
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.915501906
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.462500000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Poison the Well
Poison the Well
Avg. played: Β 
1.801.796529968
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Poison the Well that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
1.971.966832504
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
New
Arrogant Showboating
Arrogant Showboating
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Arrogant Showboating that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Yellow)
Sigil of Solace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Yellow) that play both.
New
Concealed Object
Concealed Object
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Concealed Object that play both.
Resource
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Blue) and Authority of Ataya that play both.