Breaking Scales
Ninja Equipment - Arms
Attack Reaction - Destroy Breaking Scales: Target attack action card with combo gains +1 [Power].
Battleworn (If you defend with Breaking Scales, put a -1 [Defense] counter on it when the combat chain closes.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.852.851300448
Average Defense Value: Β
2.582.579387219
Hero
Katsu, the Wanderer
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Katsu
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Katsu that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Ira, Crimson Haze
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Ira, Crimson Haze that play both.
Benji, the Piercing Wind
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Equipment
Mask of Momentum
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Tide Flippers that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Robe
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Pouncing Paws
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blossom of Spring
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Zephyr Needle
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790951062
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Preach Modesty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Preach Modesty that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.742.736377675
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and The Weakest Link that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Dual Threat that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Retrace the Past
Avg. played: Β
2.932.926070039
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Retrace the Past that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.842939762
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.840788177
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.845977187
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.857365881
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β
2.842.837800853
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Dishonor that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.862.857825568
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.823225390
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.784769566
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.849272077
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.872.866785836
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Lord of Wind that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
2.742.740410959
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.752009185
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Surging Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.786555904
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.822.824837724
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.812.806441655
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Command and Conquer that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.732730421
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.817337866
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Mugenshi: RELEASE
Avg. played: Β
2.032.026383355
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Mugenshi: RELEASE that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.182.180711500
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.092.091654498
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Descendent Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.684276504
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β
1.541.535572409
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Tenacity that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.647265336
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.562.562158221
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Double Strike that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.655468026
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
1.551.546791444
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Salt the Wound that play both.
Leg Tap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.690470204
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Leg Tap (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.861.861959958
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Whelming Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.591475096
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Cyclone Roundhouse
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Cyclone Roundhouse that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.679172057
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.403220996
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Rising Knee Thrust (Red) that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.508433735
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Chase the Tail that play both.
Head Jab (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598320956
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Head Jab (Red) that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547936508
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Find Center
Avg. played: Β
2.552.552325581
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Find Center that play both.
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β
2.562.561313869
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Take the Tempo that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.519776268
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Head Jab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Head Jab (Blue) that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.522675737
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Rising Knee Thrust (Blue) that play both.
Be Like Water (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Be Like Water (Yellow) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Mauling Qi that play both.
Head Jab (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Head Jab (Yellow) that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Standing Order that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.802.798393113
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.271597583
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.572.569176883
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Concealed Blade that play both.
Maul
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Maul that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.783183465
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.695212006
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.712.710377044
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Art of War that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.556705476
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Pass Over that play both.
Even Bigger Than That! (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Even Bigger Than That! (Red) that play both.
Visit the Floating Dojo
Avg. played: Β
1.511.512969283
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Visit the Floating Dojo that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.476947536
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Breaking Scales and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.