Point of Engagement (Red)
Warrior Action
Your next dagger attack this turn gets +3{p}.
Until end of turn, your attacks get +1{p} while attacking a marked hero.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.371.374932501
Average Defense Value: Β
2.732.727730414
Hero
Fang, Dracai of Blades
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Fang
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Fang that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Gallantry Gold
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Crown of Providence
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Refraction Bolters
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Old Knocker
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Coat of Allegiance
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
Red Alert Visor
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Red Alert Visor that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Red Alert Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Red Alert Gloves that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Helmsman's Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Helmsman's Peak that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Deep Blue
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Quicksilver Dagger
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Quicksilver Dagger that play both.
Action
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
2.812.805031447
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.513274336
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.424242424
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.778846154
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β
2.762.763440860
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.319587629
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Point of Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.301369863
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Point of Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.431818182
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Hunt a Killer (Red) that play both.
Knife through Butter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.505747126
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Knife through Butter (Red) that play both.
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Power Stance that play both.
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Flurry Stance that play both.
Knife through Butter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Knife through Butter (Blue) that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.440000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.461538462
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.492.487804878
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Yellow) that play both.
Cut Deep (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Cut Deep (Yellow) that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.542.542168675
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β
2.542.537974684
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and For the Dracai that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β
2.472.468750000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.410958904
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β
2.682.677966102
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and For the Emperor that play both.
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and March of Loyalty that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.551440329
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
2.802.802631579
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
2.832.828767123
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β
2.532.528384279
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Searing Gaze that play both.
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.482.480000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Blistering Blade that play both.
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811965812
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Hunt's End that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β
2.372.366666667
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Imperial Intent that play both.
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β
2.792.786516854
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Endear Devotion that play both.
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β
2.352.351648352
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β
2.362.360465116
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Stabbing Pain that play both.
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.662650602
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and To the Point (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.430107527
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β
2.292.293333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Take a Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.472527473
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Take a Stab (Red) that play both.
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β
2.352.354838710
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Perforate that play both.
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β
2.362.362068966
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Scalding Iron that play both.
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555555556
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.632.625000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Diced (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Diced (Red) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.541666667
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Brothers of Flame
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Brothers of Flame that play both.
Take a Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Take a Stab (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Exposed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Exposed that play both.
Defense Reaction
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β
2.532.529411765
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Smoke Out that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.590361446
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β
2.492.493150685
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Den of the Spider that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β
2.532.531578947
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β
2.502.497175141
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
2.412.411111111
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Resource
Fool's Gold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Fool's Gold that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Point of Engagement (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.