banner
New
Cut Deep (Red)
660 decks (0.1169%)
Price History
Cut Deep (Red)
Warrior Action
Your next dagger attack this turn gets +4{p}. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.181.184800900
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.772.767809433
Hero
New
Fang
Fang
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fang that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
New
Coat of Allegiance
Coat of Allegiance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
New
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Weapon
New
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Quicksilver Dagger
Quicksilver Dagger
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Quicksilver Dagger that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Action
New
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.898843931
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
New
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.850806452
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
New
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.644688645
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
New
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Power Stance that play both.
New
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
New
Cut Deep (Blue)
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.533678756
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
New
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.480314961
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.442307692
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
New
Flurry Stance
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Flurry Stance that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.656250000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
New
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.380000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt a Killer (Red) that play both.
Oath of Steel
Oath of Steel
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Oath of Steel that play both.
New
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.410000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
New
Public Bounty (Red)
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
New
Point of Engagement (Blue)
Point of Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Point of Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.575289575
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
New
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.562753036
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and For the Dracai that play both.
New
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.409395973
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
New
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
New
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.448717949
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
New
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and March of Loyalty that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Provoke that play both.
New
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.862962963
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
New
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Perforate that play both.
New
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
New
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.616959064
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Searing Gaze that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.592814371
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
New
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
New
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.591194969
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blistering Blade that play both.
New
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Endear Devotion that play both.
New
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.535398230
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Imperial Intent that play both.
New
Diced (Red)
Diced (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Diced (Red) that play both.
New
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.755102041
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt's End that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
New
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.647058824
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Incision (Red) that play both.
New
Dynastic Dedication
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.321739130
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
New
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475524476
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Stabbing Pain that play both.
New
Sisters of Fire
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.466666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sisters of Fire that play both.
New
Sizzling Steel
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.442477876
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
New
Incision (Blue)
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.434210526
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Incision (Blue) that play both.
New
Scalding Iron
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scalding Iron that play both.
New
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
New
Brothers of Flame
Brothers of Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Brothers of Flame that play both.
New
To the Point (Red)
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and To the Point (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.688976378
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.565000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Smoke Out that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735714286
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.561904762
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Den of the Spider that play both.
New
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Instant
New
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.566343042
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Pledge Fealty that play both.
New
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.596428571
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
New
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
New
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.458333333
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Snag that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.