banner
Cut Deep (Red)
1292 decks (0.1906%)
Price History
Cut Deep (Red)
Warrior Action
Your next dagger attack this turn gets +4{p}. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.311.305093612
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.762.762138629
Hero
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Fang
Fang
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fang that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Equipment
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Coat of Allegiance
Coat of Allegiance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Starting Point
Starting Point
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Quicksilver Dagger
Quicksilver Dagger
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Quicksilver Dagger that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Action
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864285714
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.858603066
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797802198
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.818639798
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.498148148
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Cut Deep (Blue)
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.397759104
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.292592593
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Power Stance that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.684210526
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.344186047
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt a Killer (Red) that play both.
Flurry Stance
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Flurry Stance that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Oath of Steel
Oath of Steel
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Oath of Steel that play both.
Point of Engagement (Red)
Point of Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Point of Engagement (Red) that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
Point of Engagement (Blue)
Point of Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Point of Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Knife through Butter (Red)
Knife through Butter (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Knife through Butter (Red) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Yellow)
Sworn Vengeance (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Yellow) that play both.
Cut Deep (Yellow)
Cut Deep (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Cut Deep (Yellow) that play both.
Knife through Butter (Blue)
Knife through Butter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Knife through Butter (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.509259259
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.476284585
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and For the Dracai that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.353146853
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.369318182
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
For the Emperor
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and For the Emperor that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and March of Loyalty that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.869402985
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Perforate that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.522821577
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.820796460
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811455847
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.505263158
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Searing Gaze that play both.
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.476038339
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blistering Blade that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.824933687
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.395604396
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Imperial Intent that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.760147601
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Endear Devotion that play both.
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt's End that play both.
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.502604167
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Diced (Red)
Diced (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Diced (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Sisters of Fire
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.301158301
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.350000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Dynastic Dedication
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Sizzling Steel
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.352678571
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Incision (Blue)
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Scalding Iron
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scalding Iron that play both.
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.431372549
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
To the Point (Red)
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and To the Point (Red) that play both.
Take a Stab (Red)
Take a Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475524476
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Take a Stab (Red) that play both.
Brothers of Flame
Brothers of Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Brothers of Flame that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.609561753
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.451851852
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Smoke Out that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.702222222
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444444444
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Den of the Spider that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.490787270
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.469534050
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.402298851
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.