Cut Deep (Red)
Warrior Action
Your next dagger attack this turn gets +4{p}.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.311.305349201
Average Defense Value: Β
2.762.758637110
Hero
Fang, Dracai of Blades
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Fang
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fang that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Old Knocker
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Crown of Providence
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Hood
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gallantry Gold
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Refraction Bolters
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Coat of Allegiance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
Ironsong Versus
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Starting Point
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Quicksilver Dagger
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Quicksilver Dagger that play both.
Cintari Saber
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Action
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.863453815
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
2.852.854199683
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.796477495
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.821852732
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.499145299
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.402144772
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.742.743682310
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.290780142
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689795918
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Power Stance that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.358078603
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt a Killer (Red) that play both.
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Flurry Stance that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Oath of Steel
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Oath of Steel that play both.
Point of Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Point of Engagement (Red) that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
Point of Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Point of Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Yellow) that play both.
Knife through Butter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Knife through Butter (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506065858
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β
2.482.477064220
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and For the Dracai that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β
2.362.355932203
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.370370370
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and For the Emperor that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and March of Loyalty that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.902.896296296
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.862.863084922
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Perforate that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.530166881
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
2.822.818930041
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511204482
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Searing Gaze that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814479638
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.482.482195846
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blistering Blade that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.825552826
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β
2.402.397959184
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Imperial Intent that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Hunt's End that play both.
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Endear Devotion that play both.
Diced (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Diced (Red) that play both.
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.508599509
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β
2.282.280898876
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β
2.352.350746269
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β
2.342.344537815
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scalding Iron that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.430303030
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and To the Point (Red) that play both.
Take a Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.487012987
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Take a Stab (Red) that play both.
Brothers of Flame
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Brothers of Flame that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.615664845
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β
2.462.457746479
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Smoke Out that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β
2.452.446078431
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Den of the Spider that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β
2.502.498437500
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β
2.472.473333333
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Deep (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.