Succumb to Winter (Red)
Elemental Wizard Action
Ice Fusion (As an additional cost to play Succumb to Winter, you may reveal an Ice card from your hand.)
Deal 5 arcane damage to any target. If Succumb to Winter was fused and targets a hero, destroy a frozen card in their arsenal. If it was fused and targets a frozen ally, destroy that ally.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
0.8230.8230181543
Average Defense Value:
2.622.616780107
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Iyslander
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Iyslander that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Verdance
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Verdance that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Iyslander, Stormbind
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Iyslander, Stormbind that play both.
Equipment
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Conduit of Frostburn
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Conduit of Frostburn that play both.
Storm Striders
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Glacial Horns
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Glacial Horns that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Coronet Peak
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Coronet Peak that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Mage Master Boots
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Well Grounded
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Hold Focus
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Hold Focus that play both.
Robe of Rapture
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Robe of Rapture that play both.
Ironhide Legs
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Quelling Slippers
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Quelling Slippers that play both.
Coat of Frost
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Coat of Frost that play both.
Crown of Dominion
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ironhide Helm
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blossom of Spring
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Weapon
Waning Moon
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Surgent Aethertide
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
Seerstone
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Seerstone that play both.
Action
Aether Hail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.162.156250000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Hail (Blue) that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Cold Snap (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.192.185185185
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Cold Snap (Blue) that play both.
Ice Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.242.241379310
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ice Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Aether Hail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Hail (Red) that play both.
Frosting (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.042.035714286
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Frosting (Blue) that play both.
Polar Cap (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.861.857142857
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Polar Cap (Blue) that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Arc that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Earth's Embrace that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Ice Eternal
Avg. played:
1.971.968750000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ice Eternal that play both.
Arctic Incarceration (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Arctic Incarceration (Blue) that play both.
Polar Cap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.200000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Polar Cap (Red) that play both.
Ice Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
1.921.916666667
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ice Bolt (Red) that play both.
Frost Hex
Avg. played:
2.112.111111111
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Frost Hex that play both.
Freezing Point
Avg. played:
2.122.115384615
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Freezing Point that play both.
Encase
Avg. played:
1.921.920000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Encase that play both.
Frosting (Red)
Avg. played:
1.801.800000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Frosting (Red) that play both.
Icebind (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.801.800000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Icebind (Blue) that play both.
Arctic Incarceration (Red)
Avg. played:
1.791.785714286
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Arctic Incarceration (Red) that play both.
Icebind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Icebind (Red) that play both.
Brain Freeze (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.232.230769231
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Brain Freeze (Blue) that play both.
suspended - Classic Constructed
Amulet of Ice
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Amulet of Ice that play both.
Succumb to Winter (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.561.562500000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Succumb to Winter (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.312.307692308
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Harvest Season (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Harvest Season (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Photon Splicing (Yellow) that play both.
Blessing of Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blessing of Aether (Red) that play both.
Aether Icevein (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.294117647
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Icevein (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played:
2.382.384615385
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Isenhowl Weathervane (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Isenhowl Weathervane (Blue) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Tempest Aurora (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Swell Tidings that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Aether Icevein (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Icevein (Blue) that play both.
Insidious Chill
Avg. played:
2.082.076923077
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Insidious Chill that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Cold Snap (Red)
Avg. played:
1.431.428571429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Cold Snap (Red) that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.571.571428571
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Isenhowl Weathervane (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Isenhowl Weathervane (Red) that play both.
Aether Icevein (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.142.142857143
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Icevein (Yellow) that play both.
Isenhowl Weathervane (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Isenhowl Weathervane (Yellow) that play both.
Brain Freeze (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Brain Freeze (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Icebind (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Icebind (Yellow) that play both.
Succumb to Winter (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Succumb to Winter (Yellow) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Channel the Bleak Expanse
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Channel the Bleak Expanse that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Sap (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sap (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Aether (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blessing of Aether (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Aether (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blessing of Aether (Yellow) that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Attack Action
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Yellow) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Summer's Fall (Yellow) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Censor that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Down and Dirty
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Down and Dirty that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
1.641.636363636
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Icy Encounter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Icy Encounter (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Permafrost (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Permafrost (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Permafrost (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Permafrost (Blue) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Block
Mental Block
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Mental Block that play both.
Instant
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played:
2.232.230769231
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blizzard that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Oasis Respite (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Oasis Respite (Blue) that play both.
Rewind
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Rewind that play both.
Tome of Duplicity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Tome of Duplicity that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Will of Arcana that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.