banner
Succumb to Winter (Red)
47 decks (0.007753%)
Price History
Succumb to Winter (Red)
Elemental Wizard Action
Ice Fusion (As an additional cost to play Succumb to Winter, you may reveal an Ice card from your hand.) Deal 5 arcane damage to any target. If Succumb to Winter was fused and targets a hero, destroy a frozen card in their arsenal. If it was fused and targets a frozen ally, destroy that ally.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
0.8690.8687977019
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.612.614897856
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Iyslander
Iyslander
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Iyslander that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Verdance
Verdance
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Verdance that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Iyslander, Stormbind
Iyslander, Stormbind
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Iyslander, Stormbind that play both.
Equipment
Conduit of Frostburn
Conduit of Frostburn
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Conduit of Frostburn that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Glacial Horns
Glacial Horns
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Glacial Horns that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Coronet Peak
Coronet Peak
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Coronet Peak that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
Spellfire Cloak
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
Helm of Lignum Vitae
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
Stonewall Gauntlet
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Robe of Rapture
Robe of Rapture
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Robe of Rapture that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
Ironhide Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Legs
Ironhide Legs
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Quelling Slippers
Quelling Slippers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Quelling Slippers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Coat of Frost
Coat of Frost
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Coat of Frost that play both.
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Hold Focus
Hold Focus
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Hold Focus that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Seeker's Hood
Seeker's Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Seeker's Hood that play both.
Ironhide Helm
Ironhide Helm
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
Plume of Evergrowth
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
Ironrot Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Weapon
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
Staff of Verdant Shoots
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Surgent Aethertide
Surgent Aethertide
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
Seerstone
Seerstone
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Seerstone that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
Crucible of Aetherweave
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Action
Aether Hail (Blue)
Aether Hail (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.182.181818182
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Hail (Blue) that play both.
New
Ring of Roses
Ring of Roses
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ring of Roses that play both.
Cold Snap (Blue)
Cold Snap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.214285714
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Cold Snap (Blue) that play both.
Ice Bolt (Blue)
Ice Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.152.151515152
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ice Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Aether Hail (Red)
Aether Hail (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.132.125000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Hail (Red) that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.571428571
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.571428571
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Frosting (Blue)
Frosting (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.072.068965517
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Frosting (Blue) that play both.
Polar Cap (Blue)
Polar Cap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.821.818181818
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Polar Cap (Blue) that play both.
Ice Eternal
Ice Eternal
Avg. played: Β 
2.032.029411765
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ice Eternal that play both.
Arctic Incarceration (Blue)
Arctic Incarceration (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.042.038461538
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Arctic Incarceration (Blue) that play both.
Polar Cap (Red)
Polar Cap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.200000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Polar Cap (Red) that play both.
Ice Bolt (Red)
Ice Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.881.880000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Ice Bolt (Red) that play both.
Aether Arc
Aether Arc
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Arc that play both.
Freezing Point
Freezing Point
Avg. played: Β 
2.112.107142857
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Freezing Point that play both.
Frost Hex
Frost Hex
Avg. played: Β 
2.142.142857143
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Frost Hex that play both.
Encase
Encase
Avg. played: Β 
1.961.961538462
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Encase that play both.
Frosting (Red)
Frosting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.801.800000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Frosting (Red) that play both.
Icebind (Blue)
Icebind (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.801.800000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Icebind (Blue) that play both.
Icebind (Red)
Icebind (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Icebind (Red) that play both.
Arctic Incarceration (Red)
Arctic Incarceration (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.791.785714286
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Arctic Incarceration (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Brain Freeze (Blue)
Brain Freeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Brain Freeze (Blue) that play both.
suspended - Classic Constructed
Amulet of Ice
Amulet of Ice
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Amulet of Ice that play both.
Aether Icevein (Red)
Aether Icevein (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.238095238
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Icevein (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428571429
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Swell Tidings that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Succumb to Winter (Blue)
Succumb to Winter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.531.529411765
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Succumb to Winter (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.357142857
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.384615385
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Blessing of Aether (Red)
Blessing of Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blessing of Aether (Red) that play both.
Isenhowl Weathervane (Blue)
Isenhowl Weathervane (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Isenhowl Weathervane (Blue) that play both.
Aether Icevein (Blue)
Aether Icevein (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.545454545
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Icevein (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Earth's Embrace that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Yellow)
Photon Splicing (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Photon Splicing (Yellow) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Blue)
Exploding Aether (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Exploding Aether (Blue) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Yellow)
Exploding Aether (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Exploding Aether (Yellow) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.375000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.381.375000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Insidious Chill
Insidious Chill
Avg. played: Β 
2.082.076923077
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Insidious Chill that play both.
Aether Icevein (Yellow)
Aether Icevein (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.112.111111111
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Icevein (Yellow) that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Red)
Tempest Aurora (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Tempest Aurora (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.571.571428571
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Succumb to Winter (Yellow)
Succumb to Winter (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Succumb to Winter (Yellow) that play both.
Brain Freeze (Red)
Brain Freeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.431.428571429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Brain Freeze (Red) that play both.
Isenhowl Weathervane (Red)
Isenhowl Weathervane (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428571429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Isenhowl Weathervane (Red) that play both.
Isenhowl Weathervane (Yellow)
Isenhowl Weathervane (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Isenhowl Weathervane (Yellow) that play both.
Cold Snap (Red)
Cold Snap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.431.428571429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Cold Snap (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Icebind (Yellow)
Icebind (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Icebind (Yellow) that play both.
Channel the Bleak Expanse
Channel the Bleak Expanse
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Channel the Bleak Expanse that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Scour
Scour
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Scour that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Sap (Red)
Sap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sap (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Aether (Blue)
Blessing of Aether (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blessing of Aether (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Aether (Yellow)
Blessing of Aether (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blessing of Aether (Yellow) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Mind Warp
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Attack Action
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.641.636363636
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Yellow)
Blossoming Decay (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Yellow) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Yellow)
Summer's Fall (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Summer's Fall (Yellow) that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Censor that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Down and Dirty
Down and Dirty
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Down and Dirty that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Icy Encounter (Red)
Icy Encounter (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Icy Encounter (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Permafrost (Red)
Sigil of Permafrost (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.951.954545455
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Permafrost (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Permafrost (Blue)
Sigil of Permafrost (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Permafrost (Blue) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Permafrost (Yellow)
Sigil of Permafrost (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Permafrost (Yellow) that play both.
Block
Mental Block
Mental Block
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Mental Block that play both.
Instant
New
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Rampant Growth - Life
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Blizzard
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.230769231
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Blizzard that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
Oasis Respite (Blue)
Oasis Respite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Oasis Respite (Blue) that play both.
Rewind
Rewind
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Rewind that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Tome of Duplicity
Tome of Duplicity
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Tome of Duplicity that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Will of Arcana
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Will of Arcana that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Winter (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.