banner
New
Hold Focus
598 decks (0.1378%)
Price History

No price data yet.

Hold Focus
Wizard Equipment - Arms
Action -- Destroy this: Amp 1. Go again (The next time you would deal arcane damage this turn, instead deal that much plus 1.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.092.086842159
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.472.471338613
Hero
New
Verdance
Verdance
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Verdance that play both.
New
Oscilio
Oscilio
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Oscilio that play both.
New
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
New
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Equipment
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Storm Striders that play both.
New
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
Plume of Evergrowth
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
New
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Well Grounded that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Crown of Providence that play both.
New
Helm of Lignum Vitae
Helm of Lignum Vitae
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
Stonewall Gauntlet
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
New
Ink-lined Cloak
Ink-lined Cloak
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Ink-lined Cloak that play both.
New
Flash of Brilliance
Flash of Brilliance
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Balance of Justice that play both.
New
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Mage Master Boots that play both.
New
Twinkle Toes
Twinkle Toes
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Twinkle Toes that play both.
New
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Weapon
Surgent Aethertide
Surgent Aethertide
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
New
Staff of Verdant Shoots
Staff of Verdant Shoots
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
New
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Waning Moon that play both.
Action
New
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864253394
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
New
Destructive Aethertide
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
New
Channel the Millennium Tree
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835443038
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Mind Warp
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836956522
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Mind Warp that play both.
Healing Potion
Healing Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.855513308
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Healing Potion that play both.
Aether Arc
Aether Arc
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Aether Arc that play both.
New
Harvest Season (Red)
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714285714
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Scour
Scour
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.771739130
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Scour that play both.
New
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.687179487
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.709219858
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.586206897
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
New
Earth's Embrace
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Earth's Embrace that play both.
New
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.652173913
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Swell Tidings that play both.
New
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.534351145
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
New
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554545455
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Perennial Aetherbloom (Red) that play both.
New
Arcane Twining (Red)
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.486956522
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
New
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.558823529
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Red)
Snapback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Snapback (Red) that play both.
New
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.436170213
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Forked Lightning
Forked Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.617283951
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Forked Lightning that play both.
New
Exploding Aether (Red)
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.494845361
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
New
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
New
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Pop the Bubble (Blue) that play both.
New
Sigil of Earth
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.520000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Sigil of Earth that play both.
New
Comet Storm - Shock
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
New
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Trailblazing Aether (Blue) that play both.
Flash (Red)
Flash (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Flash (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and The Weakest Link that play both.
New
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Energy Potion that play both.
New
Sigil of Fyendal
Sigil of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Sigil of Fyendal that play both.
Attack Action
New
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.892030848
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Felling of the Crown that play both.
New
Plow Under
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.900000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Plow Under that play both.
New
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797530864
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.878881988
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
New
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.824817518
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
New
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
New
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.685344828
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
New
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770833333
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
New
Summer's Fall (Red)
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.629870130
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.731707317
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
New
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.690721649
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
New
Earth Form (Red)
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Enlightened Strike that play both.
New
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.529411765
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
New
Blossoming Decay (Yellow)
Blossoming Decay (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Blossoming Decay (Yellow) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Fry (Red) that play both.
New
Flittering Charge (Red)
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
New
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
New
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
New
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.851162791
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Fate Foreseen that play both.
New
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
New
Rampant Growth - Life
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.820388350
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.832635983
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
New
Seeds of Tomorrow
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.633986928
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
New
Fertile Ground (Red)
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.493055556
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
New
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.402439024
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
New
Sigil of Forethought
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
New
Sigil of Aether
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.589743590
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Sigil of Aether that play both.
New
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
New
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
New
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
New
Sigil of Brilliance
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.474358974
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
New
Sigil of Conductivity
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Blink
Blink
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Blink that play both.
Resource
New
Will of Arcana
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Will of Arcana that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold Focus and Heart of Fyendal that play both.