Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
Instant -- Discard this: Gain 2{g}
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.792.786548570
Average Defense Value:
2.462.459498857
Hero
Jarl Vetreiđi
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Jarl Vetreiđi that play both.
Verdance
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Verdance that play both.
Florian
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Florian that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Storm Striders
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Metacarpus Node
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Face Purgatory
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Tectonic Crust
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Hold Focus
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Hold Focus that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Bloodied Oval
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Runehold Release
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Runehold Release that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Surgent Aethertide
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Reaping Blade
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Rotwood Reaper
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Rotwood Reaper that play both.
Waning Moon
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Scepter of Pain
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Dread Scythe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Dread Scythe that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
2.792.785511364
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played:
2.742.739213198
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
2.692.690076336
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Healing Potion
Avg. played:
2.792.788067676
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Healing Potion that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
2.752.746781116
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Germinate that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.627287854
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.631956912
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Scour
Avg. played:
2.732.726394850
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Scour that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Aether Arc that play both.
Thistle Bloom - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Thistle Bloom - Life that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Earth's Embrace that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.622972973
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played:
2.642.641025641
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.638743455
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.522222222
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
2.612.607210626
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.510392610
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Attack Action
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.678883564
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
2.792.786006826
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
2.782.781227173
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.704152249
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.676494676
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.763196481
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.832.828478964
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.619878604
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.583333333
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.588283828
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.552.551787351
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.542.544100802
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.544811321
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.725611470
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.760075567
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.642.637043189
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Blue) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played:
2.802.795454545
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played:
2.742.741732283
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.753462604
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
2.542.536693192
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.522565321
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.483870968
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Will of Arcana that play both.