Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
Instant -- Discard this: Gain 2{g}
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.752.747214410
Average Defense Value:
2.482.483995598
Hero
Verdance
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Verdance that play both.
Florian
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Florian that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Equipment
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Face Purgatory
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Hold Focus
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Hold Focus that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Bloodied Oval
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Weapon
Surgent Aethertide
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
Waning Moon
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Reaping Blade
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Scepter of Pain
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Rotwood Reaper
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Rotwood Reaper that play both.
Dread Scythe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Dread Scythe that play both.
Action
Ring of Roses
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Ring of Roses that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
2.782.781071836
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Pounamu Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Pounamu Amulet that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played:
2.762.761644716
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Burn Bare
Avg. played:
2.082.076923077
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Burn Bare that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
2.842.835895118
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Healing Potion
Avg. played:
2.802.795465509
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Healing Potion that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
2.722.720760234
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Scour
Avg. played:
2.762.761757106
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Scour that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played:
2.772.766497462
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Germinate that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Aether Arc that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.621638924
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.573229292
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.639445300
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Thistle Bloom - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Thistle Bloom - Life that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.632352941
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.552.552031715
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.568065507
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Earth's Embrace that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
1.481.481975968
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Attack Action
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.701000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
2.812.805532272
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.722920407
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
2.812.805679785
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.629546095
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.852.852322524
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.714223003
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.597214783
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.562.562708102
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.572.566946779
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.574679113
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.547846890
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.524786325
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.592982456
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.743211134
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.842.839240506
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.755871651
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.662.660586836
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Blue) that play both.
Block
Mental Block
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Mental Block that play both.
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played:
2.752.750309023
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.752259655
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
2.062.062998102
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.464367816
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Red) and Will of Arcana that play both.