Ring of Roses
Wizard Action - Aura
Legendary Verdance Specialization (You may only have 1 Ring of Roses in your deck, and only if your hero is Verdance.)
The first time you deal arcane damage each turn, gain 1{g}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.122.122979492
Average Defense Value: Β
2.562.560681772
Hero
Equipment
Plume of Evergrowth
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Storm Striders that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Metacarpus Node
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Crown of Providence
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Crown of Providence that play both.
Well Grounded
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Well Grounded that play both.
Old Knocker
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Old Knocker that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Action
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.862.858678955
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played: Β
2.862.862225097
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played: Β
2.892.885203482
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Scour
Avg. played: Β
2.842.844620557
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Scour that play both.
Healing Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.882.877047115
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Healing Potion that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764946048
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β
2.882.882454924
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Mind Warp that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played: Β
2.822.821029083
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Aether Arc that play both.
Burn Bare
Avg. played: Β
2.372.371428571
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Burn Bare that play both.
Pounamu Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Pounamu Amulet that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
1.661.661309290
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Energy Potion that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.756209752
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608549874
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.542406312
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Snapback (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.411764706
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.449877751
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Pop the Bubble (Blue) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.864633174
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
2.892.891739130
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.869592875
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
2.902.899752753
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Plow Under that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Command and Conquer that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.660110149
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.751559841
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.466315173
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.643507031
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.417601381
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Evergreen (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Evergreen (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.873522459
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.660040924
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.815763866
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.852.852291326
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.627557981
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Rootbound Carapace (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Mental Block
Avg. played: Β
2.742.735528220
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Mental Block that play both.
Instant
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played: Β
2.842.839952105
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.855463532
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
1.821.816847826
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Snag
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Snag that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Will of Arcana that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Ring of Roses and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.