banner
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
28566 decks (4.339%)
Price History

No price data yet.

Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
Instant -- Discard this: Gain 2{g}
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.672.672020625
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.592.589953912
Hero
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Verdance
Verdance
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Verdance that play both.
Florian
Florian
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Florian that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Equipment
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Well Grounded that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
Plume of Evergrowth
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Storm Striders that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
Grasp of the Arknight
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Face Purgatory
Face Purgatory
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
Dyadic Carapace
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
Stonewall Gauntlet
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Heart of Ice
Heart of Ice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
Vexing Quillhand
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Bloodied Oval
Bloodied Oval
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
Helm of Lignum Vitae
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
Crown of Dichotomy
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Civic Steps that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Weapon
Surgent Aethertide
Surgent Aethertide
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
Reaping Blade
Reaping Blade
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Waning Moon that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Scepter of Pain
Scepter of Pain
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Redwood Hammer
Redwood Hammer
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Action
Ring of Roses
Ring of Roses
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Ring of Roses that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833474996
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.847903026
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Germinate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Germinate that play both.
Healing Potion
Healing Potion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Healing Potion that play both.
Scour
Scour
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.818262750
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Scour that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Pounamu Amulet
Pounamu Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Pounamu Amulet that play both.
Burn Bare
Burn Bare
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.227272727
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Burn Bare that play both.
Mind Warp
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Mind Warp that play both.
Aether Arc
Aether Arc
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Aether Arc that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.493488605
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.717387270
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437500000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Midas Touch that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Thistle Bloom - Life
Thistle Bloom - Life
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Thistle Bloom - Life that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Surface Shaking
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Ice Quake (Red)
Ice Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Ice Quake (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Condemn to Slaughter (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
1.491.486846379
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Energy Potion that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Earth's Embrace that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Attack Action
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.822746399
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.877153000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.865377176
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Plow Under that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.888815876
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770746888
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.717802147
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.628122398
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Oaken Old
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Oaken Old that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Mangle
Mangle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Mangle that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.631160297
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620066473
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.644714459
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Dread Triptych
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Yellow)
Autumn's Touch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.683202190
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.854029720
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826653307
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.863338534
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743318338
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.665792658
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Haunting Rendition
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Mental Block
Mental Block
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Mental Block that play both.
Instant
Rampant Growth - Life
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.819330090
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.822283610
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β 
1.981.978954566
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.361.357142857
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Blizzard
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.564346997
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Blizzard that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Will of Arcana
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Will of Arcana that play both.