Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
Instant -- Discard this: Gain 2{g}
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.692.688127913
Average Defense Value:
2.592.590475713
Hero
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Verdance
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Verdance that play both.
Florian
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Florian that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Equipment
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Well Grounded that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Storm Striders that play both.
Nullrune Boots
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Metacarpus Node
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Craterhoof
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Craterhoof that play both.
Face Purgatory
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Base of the Mountain
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Arcane Lantern
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Heart of Ice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Old Knocker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Old Knocker that play both.
Bloodied Oval
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Civic Steps
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Civic Steps that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Weapon
Surgent Aethertide
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
Reaping Blade
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Waning Moon
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Waning Moon that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Titan's Fist
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Scepter of Pain
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Redwood Hammer
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Action
Ring of Roses
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Ring of Roses that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played:
2.832.831612223
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
2.852.846961084
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Germinate that play both.
Healing Potion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Healing Potion that play both.
Scour
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Scour that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Burn Bare
Avg. played:
2.682.679487179
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Burn Bare that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Mind Warp that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Aether Arc that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.491627678
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.718165138
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Thistle Bloom - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Thistle Bloom - Life that play both.
Pounamu Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Pounamu Amulet that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played:
2.032.029850746
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Midas Touch that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Ice Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Ice Quake (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Condemn to Slaughter (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
1.491.486990042
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Energy Potion that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Earth's Embrace that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Attack Action
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.822.822446556
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
2.882.876491956
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
2.862.863610288
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Plow Under that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.892.889226002
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.769646071
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.715787042
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.627793580
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Oaken Old that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Mangle that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.631126832
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Headbutt that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.622.617724599
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Fault Line
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fault Line that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.642.643180195
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.680985573
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.853021763
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.827040055
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.862.860085444
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.742.741870979
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played:
2.662.664613551
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Mental Block
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Mental Block that play both.
Instant
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played:
2.822.819098732
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.821453847
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
1.981.975423919
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played:
2.562.557072516
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Blizzard that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Will of Arcana that play both.