Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
Instant -- Discard this: Gain 2{g}
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.662.660852055
Average Defense Value:
2.572.574444498
Hero
Verdance
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Verdance that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Florian
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Florian that play both.
Terra
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Terra that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Equipment
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Well Grounded that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Storm Striders
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Storm Striders that play both.
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Metacarpus Node
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Nullrune Boots
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Face Purgatory
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Civic Steps
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Civic Steps that play both.
Heart of Ice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Bloodied Oval
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Hold Focus
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Hold Focus that play both.
Weapon
Surgent Aethertide
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
Reaping Blade
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Waning Moon
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Waning Moon that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Titan's Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Scepter of Pain
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Redwood Hammer
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Action
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played:
2.812.809812353
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
2.832.834498580
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
2.832.825018182
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Germinate that play both.
Healing Potion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Healing Potion that play both.
Scour
Avg. played:
2.802.796489485
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Scour that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Mind Warp that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Aether Arc that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.521660650
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.700967906
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Thistle Bloom - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Thistle Bloom - Life that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played:
2.592.594395280
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Earth's Embrace that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Condemn to Slaughter (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Ice Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Ice Quake (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
2.852.852261482
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.788661468
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
2.842.842651406
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Plow Under that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.862.862220192
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.793591255
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.732.731429338
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.682910367
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Oaken Old that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.630565334
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.626417769
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Mangle that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.612.611111111
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Yellow) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.692463842
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.827279427
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.797855408
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.722.721758552
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played:
2.612.613656518
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played:
2.812.811999536
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.805220357
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
2.082.081694245
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Blizzard that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fruits of the Forest (Blue) and Will of Arcana that play both.