Tit for Tat
Generic Action
{t} target hero. {u} another target hero.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.613.612699600
Average Defense Value: Β
2.362.361762595
Hero
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Boots to the Boards
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Boots to the Boards that play both.
Nullrune Boots
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Skullhorn
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Skullhorn that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Dominion
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Providence that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Light Fingers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Light Fingers that play both.
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Balance of Justice that play both.
Dead Threads
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dead Threads that play both.
Peg Leg
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Peg Leg that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Blue Sea Tricorn
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Weapon
Talishar, the Lost Prince
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Romping Club that play both.
Titan's Fist
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Titan's Fist that play both.
Action
Song of Sinew
Avg. played: Β
2.802.795454545
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Song of Sinew that play both.
Humble Entrance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Humble Entrance that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.192.190476190
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Heroic Grit
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Heroic Grit that play both.
Cheers!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Cheers! that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.492.485714286
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Portside Exchange that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shifting Tides that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
1.591.590909091
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Heroic Pose (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Heroic Pose (Yellow) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Avast Ye! that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riggermortis that play both.
Clearing Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Clearing Bellow that play both.
Beat the Same Drum
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Beat the Same Drum that play both.
Heroic Pose (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Heroic Pose (Blue) that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loan Shark that play both.
Pearl Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pearl Amulet that play both.
Nimblism (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Yellow) that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Regain Composure
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Regain Composure that play both.
Primeval Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Primeval Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Wind Up the Crowd
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wind Up the Crowd that play both.
Crowd Goes Wild
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crowd Goes Wild that play both.
Jaws of Victory
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jaws of Victory that play both.
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Buckwild (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buckwild (Yellow) that play both.
No Hero Stands Alone
Avg. played: Β
2.842.836734694
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and No Hero Stands Alone that play both.
Good Natured Brutality
Avg. played: Β
2.762.755102041
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Good Natured Brutality that play both.
Disarm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Disarm that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Dig In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dig In (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Vigorous Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Old Leather and Vim
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Old Leather and Vim that play both.
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tough Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Strongest Survive (Yellow) that play both.
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tough Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Buckwild (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buckwild (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Dig In (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dig In (Blue) that play both.
Buckwild (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buckwild (Red) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
Energetic Impact
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Energetic Impact that play both.
Disperse
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Disperse that play both.
Escalate Order
Avg. played: Β
2.682.684210526
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Escalate Order that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Send Packing that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
1.721.718750000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Legs that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
Comeback Kid (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Comeback Kid (Yellow) that play both.
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.712.705882353
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Show of Strength that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.459459459
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
HMS Kraken
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Kraken that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.307692308
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Marlin that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.352.347826087
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Command and Conquer that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Old Favorite
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Old Favorite that play both.
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played: Β
2.622.615384615
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Reckless Stampede that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swing Big that play both.
HMS Barracuda
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Barracuda that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Overcrowded that play both.
Fight from Behind (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fight from Behind (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Yellow) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Ripple Away that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Reckless Swing that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.242.242424242
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Never Give Up
Avg. played: Β
2.062.058823529
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Never Give Up that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Visit the Boneyard
Avg. played: Β
2.642.636363636
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Visit the Boneyard that play both.
Numbskull Charm
Avg. played: Β
2.782.777777778
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Numbskull Charm that play both.
Not So Fast
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Not So Fast that play both.
Shining Courage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shining Courage that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Eye of Ophidia that play both.