Tit for Tat
Generic Action
{t} target hero. {u} another target hero.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.203.196904126
Average Defense Value: Β
2.382.375952179
Hero
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Skullhorn
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Skullhorn that play both.
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Crown of Dominion
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Crown of Providence
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Providence that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Peg Leg
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Peg Leg that play both.
Light Fingers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Light Fingers that play both.
Quick Clicks
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Quick Clicks that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Dead Threads
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dead Threads that play both.
Blue Sea Tricorn
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
Washed Up Wave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Washed Up Wave that play both.
Savage Sash
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Savage Sash that play both.
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Mage Master Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Head Stone
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Head Stone that play both.
Breakwater Undertow
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Breakwater Undertow that play both.
Weapon
Talishar, the Lost Prince
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Romping Club that play both.
Action
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.252.250000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.452.454545455
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Portside Exchange that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shifting Tides that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
1.651.650000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Clearing Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Clearing Bellow that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Avast Ye! that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loan Shark that play both.
Nimblism (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Yellow) that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riggermortis that play both.
Regain Composure
Avg. played: Β
2.382.384615385
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Regain Composure that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Primeval Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Primeval Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Blue) that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Pearl Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pearl Amulet that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loot the Hold that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Moray le Fay
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Moray le Fay that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swabbie that play both.
Yo Ho Ho!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Yo Ho Ho! that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Call to the Grave that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Power (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Lead with Power (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.292.285714286
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.441176471
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
1.681.678571429
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Legs that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Murderous Rabble that play both.
HMS Kraken
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Kraken that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.320000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Marlin that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.262.263157895
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Command and Conquer that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
HMS Barracuda
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Barracuda that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Send Packing that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.388888889
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.312500000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Yellow) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swing Big that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.192.193548387
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Test of Strength that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Instant
Not So Fast
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Not So Fast that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.