Tit for Tat
Generic Action
{t} target hero. {u} another target hero.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.073.073772220
Average Defense Value: Β
2.392.389765208
Hero
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Dominion
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Skullhorn
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Skullhorn that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Peg Leg
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Peg Leg that play both.
Light Fingers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Light Fingers that play both.
Quick Clicks
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Quick Clicks that play both.
Blue Sea Tricorn
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
Washed Up Wave
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Washed Up Wave that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Head Stone
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Head Stone that play both.
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Balance of Justice that play both.
Breakwater Undertow
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Breakwater Undertow that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Dead Threads
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dead Threads that play both.
Old Knocker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Old Knocker that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Mage Master Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Savage Sash
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Savage Sash that play both.
Weapon
Action
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.172.166666667
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Portside Exchange that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shifting Tides that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
1.651.650000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Yellow) that play both.
Regain Composure
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Regain Composure that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Avast Ye! that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loan Shark that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Clearing Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Clearing Bellow that play both.
Primeval Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Primeval Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Blue) that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riggermortis that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Truce that play both.
Moray le Fay
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Moray le Fay that play both.
Pearl Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pearl Amulet that play both.
Yo Ho Ho!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Yo Ho Ho! that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loot the Hold that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Call to the Grave that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Power (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Lead with Power (Yellow) that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swabbie that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and This Round's on Me that play both.
Attack Action
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.851.851851852
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.072.066666667
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.387096774
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
1.691.692307692
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Legs that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
HMS Kraken
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Kraken that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.320000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Marlin that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Command and Conquer that play both.
HMS Barracuda
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Barracuda that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.092.086956522
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Yellow) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Yellow) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Send Packing that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Gold Hunter Ketch
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gold Hunter Ketch that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Yellow) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Saltwater Swell (Yellow) that play both.
Pay Up
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pay Up that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Blue) that play both.
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jittery Bones (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.642.636363636
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Test of Strength that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fiddler's Green (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Not So Fast
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Not So Fast that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Fool's Gold
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fool's Gold that play both.