Tit for Tat
Generic Action
{t} target hero. {u} another target hero.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.762.758099957
Average Defense Value: Β
2.392.385352810
Hero
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Marlynn
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Marlynn that play both.
Equipment
Gold-Baited Hook
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Nullrune Boots
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Dominion
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Peg Leg
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Peg Leg that play both.
Light Fingers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Light Fingers that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Nullrune Robe
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Washed Up Wave
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Washed Up Wave that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Quick Clicks
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Quick Clicks that play both.
Blue Sea Tricorn
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
Breakwater Undertow
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Breakwater Undertow that play both.
Head Stone
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Head Stone that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Savage Sash
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Savage Sash that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Providence that play both.
Perch Grapplers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Dead Threads
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dead Threads that play both.
Mage Master Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Graven Justaucorpse
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Graven Justaucorpse that play both.
Weapon
Action
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.152.153846154
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.462.461538462
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Portside Exchange that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β
1.781.777777778
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shifting Tides that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
1.671.666666667
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Nimblism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Avast Ye! that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Clearing Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Clearing Bellow that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and This Round's on Me that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loan Shark that play both.
Heave Ho!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Heave Ho! that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loot the Hold that play both.
Yo Ho Ho!
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Yo Ho Ho! that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riggermortis that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Call to the Grave that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swabbie that play both.
Awakening Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Awakening Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Burdens of the Past
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Burdens of the Past that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Primeval Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Primeval Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Regain Composure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Regain Composure that play both.
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Cutty Shark, Quick Clip that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scooba, Salty Sea Dog that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Moray le Fay
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Moray le Fay that play both.
Mutiny on the Battalion Barque
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mutiny on the Battalion Barque that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Chart a Course (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Chart a Course (Red) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Truce that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign that play both.
Bad Beats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Bad Beats (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Trot Along that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Enchanting Melody (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Enchanting Melody (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sigil of Fyendal that play both.
Attack Action
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.751.750000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
1.641.642857143
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Legs that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.202.200000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.461538462
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
HMS Barracuda
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Barracuda that play both.
HMS Kraken
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Kraken that play both.
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Marlin that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Command and Conquer that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Red) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Yellow) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Freewheeling Renegades (Red) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimble Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Yellow) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Yellow) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Pilfer the Wreck (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pilfer the Wreck (Red) that play both.
Pilfer the Wreck (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pilfer the Wreck (Yellow) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Thiev'n Varmints
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Thiev'n Varmints that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
Jittery Bones (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jittery Bones (Red) that play both.
Restless Bones (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Restless Bones (Red) that play both.
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jittery Bones (Blue) that play both.
Pay Up
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pay Up that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Swing Fist, Think Later (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swing Fist, Think Later (Blue) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Reckless Swing that play both.
Blood in the Water
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Blood in the Water that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Test of Strength that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fiddler's Green (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Not So Fast
Avg. played: Β
1.781.777777778
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Not So Fast that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Fool's Gold
Avg. played: Β
1.801.800000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fool's Gold that play both.