banner
New
Tit for Tat
8 decks (0.001238%)
Price History

No price data yet.

Tit for Tat
Generic Action
{t} target hero. {u} another target hero. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.183.180653428
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.312.314890561
Hero
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
New
Scurv, Stowaway
Scurv, Stowaway
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Equipment
New
Gold-Baited Hook
Gold-Baited Hook
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
New
Peg Leg
Peg Leg
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Peg Leg that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
Compass of Sunken Depths
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
New
Buccaneer's Bounty
Buccaneer's Bounty
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Hood that play both.
New
Dead Threads
Dead Threads
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dead Threads that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
New
Light Fingers
Light Fingers
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Light Fingers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Providence that play both.
Deep Blue
Deep Blue
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Deep Blue that play both.
Breakwater Undertow
Breakwater Undertow
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Breakwater Undertow that play both.
New
Blue Sea Tricorn
Blue Sea Tricorn
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
Hope Merchant's Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Time Skippers that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
New
Head Stone
Head Stone
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Head Stone that play both.
Washed Up Wave
Washed Up Wave
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Washed Up Wave that play both.
Weapon
Talishar, the Lost Prince
Talishar, the Lost Prince
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Action
New
Tip the Barkeep
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.200000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
New
Shifting Tides
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shifting Tides that play both.
New
Loan Shark
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.750000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loan Shark that play both.
New
Sea Floor Salvage
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Portside Exchange
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Portside Exchange that play both.
New
Regain Composure
Regain Composure
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Regain Composure that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Avast Ye! that play both.
New
Heave Ho!
Heave Ho!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Heave Ho! that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Loot the Hold
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loot the Hold that play both.
New
Yo Ho Ho!
Yo Ho Ho!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Yo Ho Ho! that play both.
New
Flying High (Blue)
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Riggermortis
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riggermortis that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
New
Divvy Up
Divvy Up
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Divvy Up that play both.
New
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Chowder, Hearty Cook that play both.
New
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Cutty Shark, Quick Clip that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
New
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scooba, Salty Sea Dog that play both.
New
Shelly, Hardened Traveler
Shelly, Hardened Traveler
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shelly, Hardened Traveler that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Call to the Grave
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Call to the Grave that play both.
New
Chart the High Seas
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Energy Potion that play both.
New
Flying High (Yellow)
Flying High (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Flying High (Yellow) that play both.
New
Give No Quarter
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Give No Quarter that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
New
Swabbie
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swabbie that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Attack Action
New
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
New
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
New
HMS Barracuda
HMS Barracuda
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Barracuda that play both.
New
HMS Kraken
HMS Kraken
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Kraken that play both.
New
HMS Marlin
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Marlin that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.200000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428571429
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
New
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428571429
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
New
Sea Legs
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β 
1.861.857142857
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Legs that play both.
New
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
New
Conqueror of the High Seas
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
New
Golden Tipple (Red)
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
New
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.750000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Yellow) that play both.
New
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
New
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
New
Swindler's Grift (Yellow)
Swindler's Grift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Yellow) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Murderous Rabble that play both.
New
Swiftwater Sloop (Yellow)
Swiftwater Sloop (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Yellow) that play both.
New
Swindler's Grift (Blue)
Swindler's Grift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Blue) that play both.
New
Swindler's Grift (Red)
Swindler's Grift (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Red) that play both.
New
Pilfer the Wreck (Yellow)
Pilfer the Wreck (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pilfer the Wreck (Yellow) that play both.
New
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
New
Expedition to Azuro Keys
Expedition to Azuro Keys
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Expedition to Azuro Keys that play both.
New
Expedition to Blackwater Strait
Expedition to Blackwater Strait
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Expedition to Blackwater Strait that play both.
New
Expedition to Dreadfall Reach
Expedition to Dreadfall Reach
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Expedition to Dreadfall Reach that play both.
New
Expedition to Horizon's Mantle
Expedition to Horizon's Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Expedition to Horizon's Mantle that play both.
New
Thiev'n Varmints
Thiev'n Varmints
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Thiev'n Varmints that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
Jittery Bones (Red)
Jittery Bones (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jittery Bones (Red) that play both.
Restless Bones (Red)
Restless Bones (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Restless Bones (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Blood in the Water
Blood in the Water
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Blood in the Water that play both.
Block
New
Sunken Treasure
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Test of Strength that play both.
New
Lost in Transit
Lost in Transit
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Lost in Transit that play both.
New
On the Horizon (Red)
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Instant
New
Not So Fast
Not So Fast
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Not So Fast that play both.
New
Throw Caution to the Wind
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Resource
New
Fool's Gold
Fool's Gold
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fool's Gold that play both.
New
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.