banner
Tit for Tat
75 decks (0.01051%)
Price History

No price data yet.

Tit for Tat
Generic Action
{t} target hero. {u} another target hero. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.073.073772220
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.392.389765208
Hero
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
Scurv, Stowaway
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Equipment
New
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
New
Boots to the Boards
Boots to the Boards
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Boots to the Boards that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
Gold-Baited Hook
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
Buccaneer's Bounty
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Skullhorn that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
Compass of Sunken Depths
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Peg Leg
Peg Leg
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Peg Leg that play both.
Light Fingers
Light Fingers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Light Fingers that play both.
Quick Clicks
Quick Clicks
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Quick Clicks that play both.
Blue Sea Tricorn
Blue Sea Tricorn
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
Washed Up Wave
Washed Up Wave
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Washed Up Wave that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Head Stone
Head Stone
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Head Stone that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Balance of Justice that play both.
Breakwater Undertow
Breakwater Undertow
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Breakwater Undertow that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Dead Threads
Dead Threads
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dead Threads that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Old Knocker that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
Swiftstrike Bracers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Savage Sash that play both.
Weapon
Talishar, the Lost Prince
Talishar, the Lost Prince
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Rok
Rok
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Rok that play both.
Action
Tip the Barkeep
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β 
2.172.166666667
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
New
Cheers!
Cheers!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Cheers! that play both.
New
Song of Sinew
Song of Sinew
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Song of Sinew that play both.
New
Heroic Pose (Yellow)
Heroic Pose (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Heroic Pose (Yellow) that play both.
New
Humble Entrance
Humble Entrance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Humble Entrance that play both.
New
Heroic Pose (Blue)
Heroic Pose (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Heroic Pose (Blue) that play both.
Portside Exchange
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Portside Exchange that play both.
Shifting Tides
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shifting Tides that play both.
New
Heroic Grit
Heroic Grit
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Heroic Grit that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β 
1.651.650000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Yellow)
Nimblism (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Yellow) that play both.
Regain Composure
Regain Composure
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Regain Composure that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Avast Ye! that play both.
Loan Shark
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loan Shark that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Clearing Bellow
Clearing Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Clearing Bellow that play both.
Primeval Bellow (Blue)
Primeval Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Primeval Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Blue)
Nimblism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimblism (Blue) that play both.
Riggermortis
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riggermortis that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
Truce
Truce
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Truce that play both.
Moray le Fay
Moray le Fay
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Moray le Fay that play both.
Pearl Amulet
Pearl Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pearl Amulet that play both.
Yo Ho Ho!
Yo Ho Ho!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Yo Ho Ho! that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Loot the Hold
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loot the Hold that play both.
Call to the Grave
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Call to the Grave that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Power (Yellow)
Lead with Power (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Lead with Power (Yellow) that play both.
New
Beat the Same Drum
Beat the Same Drum
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Beat the Same Drum that play both.
New
Heroic Pose (Red)
Heroic Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Heroic Pose (Red) that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Swabbie
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swabbie that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign
Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and This Round's on Me that play both.
Attack Action
New
Wind Up the Crowd
Wind Up the Crowd
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wind Up the Crowd that play both.
New
Dig In (Yellow)
Dig In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dig In (Yellow) that play both.
New
Jaws of Victory
Jaws of Victory
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jaws of Victory that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Dig In (Blue)
Dig In (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dig In (Blue) that play both.
New
Disarm
Disarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Disarm that play both.
New
Buckwild (Yellow)
Buckwild (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buckwild (Yellow) that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tough Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Good Natured Brutality
Good Natured Brutality
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Good Natured Brutality that play both.
New
Crowd Goes Wild
Crowd Goes Wild
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Crowd Goes Wild that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777777778
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Vigorous Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
New
No Hero Stands Alone
No Hero Stands Alone
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and No Hero Stands Alone that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857142857
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Tough Smashup (Blue) that play both.
New
Old Leather and Vim
Old Leather and Vim
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Old Leather and Vim that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.851.851851852
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
2.072.066666667
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.387096774
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Strongest Survive (Yellow) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Blue)
Buckwild (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buckwild (Blue) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Red)
Buckwild (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Buckwild (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β 
1.691.692307692
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sea Legs that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
HMS Kraken
HMS Kraken
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Kraken that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.320000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
HMS Marlin
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Marlin that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
New
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Show of Strength that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Command and Conquer that play both.
HMS Barracuda
HMS Barracuda
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and HMS Barracuda that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.092.086956522
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Old Favorite
Old Favorite
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Old Favorite that play both.
New
Comeback Kid (Yellow)
Comeback Kid (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Comeback Kid (Yellow) that play both.
New
Disperse
Disperse
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Disperse that play both.
New
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Smashing Ground that play both.
New
Escalate Order
Escalate Order
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Escalate Order that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Battalion Barque (Yellow) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Yellow)
Swindler's Grift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Yellow) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Send Packing that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
New
Energetic Impact
Energetic Impact
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Energetic Impact that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Overcrowded that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Strongest Survive (Blue) that play both.
New
Reckless Stampede
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Reckless Stampede that play both.
New
Rapturous Applause (Yellow)
Rapturous Applause (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Rapturous Applause (Yellow) that play both.
New
Dig In (Red)
Dig In (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Dig In (Red) that play both.
New
Empowering Ruckus
Empowering Ruckus
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Empowering Ruckus that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Red)
Vigorous Smashup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Vigorous Smashup (Red) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Gold Hunter Ketch
Gold Hunter Ketch
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Gold Hunter Ketch that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Red)
Swindler's Grift (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Yellow)
Swiftwater Sloop (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swiftwater Sloop (Yellow) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Yellow)
Saltwater Swell (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Saltwater Swell (Yellow) that play both.
Pay Up
Pay Up
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pay Up that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Blue)
Swindler's Grift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Swindler's Grift (Blue) that play both.
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Jittery Bones (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636363636
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Sunken Treasure that play both.
New
Never Give Up
Never Give Up
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Never Give Up that play both.
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Test of Strength that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Yellow)
Fiddler's Green (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fiddler's Green (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
New
Numbskull Charm
Numbskull Charm
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Numbskull Charm that play both.
New
Visit the Boneyard
Visit the Boneyard
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Visit the Boneyard that play both.
Not So Fast
Not So Fast
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Not So Fast that play both.
New
Shining Courage
Shining Courage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Shining Courage that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.
Fool's Gold
Fool's Gold
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tit for Tat and Fool's Gold that play both.