banner
Coercive Tendency
6233 decks (0.9468%)
Price History
Coercive Tendency
Assassin Attack Reaction
Arakni Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Arakni.) Look at the top 3 cards of the defending hero's deck. Put them back in any order, then banish the top card of their deck. If you complete a contract this way, your Assassin attacks get go again this combat chain.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.483.476628323
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.832.829427404
Hero
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Arakni
Arakni
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Mentor
The Hand that Pulls the Strings
The Hand that Pulls the Strings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and The Hand that Pulls the Strings that play both.
Equipment
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Flick Knives that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Redback Shroud that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shriek Razors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Crown of Providence that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Graven Call that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orbitoclast that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835286731
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857142857
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Kiss of Death that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and The Weakest Link that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
1.631.625000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Midas Touch that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Pay Day
Pay Day
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554987212
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pay Day that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.839514613
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.845293073
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.838280061
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.838045778
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Eradicate that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.843549329
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.838603115
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.816247582
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Already Dead that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867202142
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.799657534
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.773099415
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.859320047
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Regicide
Regicide
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Regicide that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.765909937
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Red)
Rob the Rich (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.749519785
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.778571429
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.760880440
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Blue) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.819338422
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.744621790
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.631.628571429
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733652313
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.683098592
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.682310469
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Yellow) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Blue) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Blue)
Rob the Rich (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.839633904
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.785123967
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.676857230
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.736301370
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.640121845
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.245878639
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Concealed Blade that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.082.084677419
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.596342260
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.722912966
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Blue) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Yellow)
Cut to the Chase (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.653390743
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Yellow) that play both.
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Throw Dagger that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.849349039
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833235121
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.781942078
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.591697646
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.505893019
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Inertia Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.513463324
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620448179
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.705882353
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Remembrance that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arcane Compliance that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plague Hive that play both.