Coercive Tendency
Assassin Attack Reaction
Arakni Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Arakni.)
Look at the top 3 cards of the defending hero's deck. Put them back in any order, then banish the top card of their deck.
If you complete a contract this way, your Assassin attacks get go again this combat chain.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.643.638258542
Average Defense Value:
2.832.830402050
Hero
Arakni, Huntsman
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Arakni
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Equipment
Blacktek Whisperers
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Flick Knives
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Flick Knives that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Arcane Lantern
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Redback Shroud
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Redback Shroud that play both.
Nullrune Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Shriek Razors
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shriek Razors that play both.
Balance of Justice
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Crown of Providence that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Graven Call that play both.
Orbitoclast
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orbitoclast that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.842.838691323
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Frailty that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and The Weakest Link that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.622.618238022
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Pay Day
Avg. played:
2.532.527827648
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pay Day that play both.
Attack Action
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.842.840919756
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
2.852.848192771
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
2.852.850859454
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Eradicate that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.862.855323484
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.848223350
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
2.832.831450382
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Already Dead that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
2.812.814218009
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.872.872597865
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Command and Conquer that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.793593011
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
2.772.770975057
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.862.859432234
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Rob the Rich (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.756416239
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Red) that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.778215870
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Regicide
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Regicide that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.788278775
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.754646840
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
1.661.664322251
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.766416510
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
2.682.682779456
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Yellow) that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.648233487
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Blue) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
2.422.415789474
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.853455020
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.792.789232532
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.674489023
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
2.732.732240437
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.611438679
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.232.226510067
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.072.073095823
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.579338843
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.732.731850117
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Blue) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.652.650793651
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.854274084
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.842.843884892
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.622.622799665
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Frailty Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.506442022
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.532.528801843
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Inertia Trap that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.628837719
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.697033898
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plague Hive that play both.