banner
Coercive Tendency
8934 decks (1.176%)
Price History
Coercive Tendency
Assassin Attack Reaction
Arakni Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Arakni.) Look at the top 3 cards of the defending hero's deck. Put them back in any order, then banish the top card of their deck. If you complete a contract this way, your Assassin attacks get go again this combat chain.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.383.377733737
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.822.823648407
Hero
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Arakni
Arakni
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Equipment
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Flick Knives that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
New
Graven Walkers
Graven Walkers
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Graven Walkers that play both.
New
Graven Gloves
Graven Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Graven Gloves that play both.
New
Graven Gaslight
Graven Gaslight
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Graven Gaslight that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Redback Shroud that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Stalker's Steps
Stalker's Steps
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Stalker's Steps that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shriek Razors that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Crown of Providence that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Graven Call that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orbitoclast that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.873536300
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Crumble to Eternity
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Kiss of Death that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and The Weakest Link that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Pay Day
Pay Day
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pay Day that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Attack Action
New
Excessive Bloodloss (Red)
Excessive Bloodloss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Excessive Bloodloss (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.874468085
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.874938635
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864404542
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.865739466
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.892368360
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833161385
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Eradicate that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.892320966
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Command and Conquer that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.802532163
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Already Dead that play both.
New
Excessive Bloodloss (Blue)
Excessive Bloodloss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Excessive Bloodloss (Blue) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770663034
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864376130
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Regicide
Regicide
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Regicide that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.814363144
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.769488429
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.788105947
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Rob the Rich (Red)
Rob the Rich (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.687518355
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.778409091
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.768964023
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.765223275
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
New
Excessive Bloodloss (Yellow)
Excessive Bloodloss (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Excessive Bloodloss (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.658003544
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.751133273
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
1.451.451841360
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Overcrowded that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.541442411
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
New
Mist Hunter
Mist Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mist Hunter that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Yellow) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Blue) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Blue)
Rob the Rich (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.860038878
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.771851342
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.613829093
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.676477684
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.647163753
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.229046243
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Concealed Blade that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.601580135
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Red) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.082.083219021
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spreading Plague that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Blue) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Yellow)
Cut to the Chase (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Yellow) that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Throw Dagger that play both.
Defense Reaction
Hunter or Hunted?
Hunter or Hunted?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hunter or Hunted? that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.879222391
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.869105333
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.832514420
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.588085540
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.473102432
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Inertia Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.507258753
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.734848485
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.779574723
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.598558446
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Remembrance that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
New
Pilfer the Tomb
Pilfer the Tomb
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pilfer the Tomb that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plague Hive that play both.