Coercive Tendency
Assassin Attack Reaction
Arakni Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Arakni.)
Look at the top 3 cards of the defending hero's deck. Put them back in any order, then banish the top card of their deck.
If you complete a contract this way, your Assassin attacks get go again this combat chain.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.503.497190284
Average Defense Value:
2.832.830632816
Hero
Arakni, Huntsman
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Arakni
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Mentor
The Hand that Pulls the Strings
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and The Hand that Pulls the Strings that play both.
Equipment
Blacktek Whisperers
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Flick Knives
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Flick Knives that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Arcane Lantern
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Mask of Deceit
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Redback Shroud
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Redback Shroud that play both.
Nullrune Hood
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Shriek Razors
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shriek Razors that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Crown of Providence that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Graven Call that play both.
Orbitoclast
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orbitoclast that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.832.831458195
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Kiss of Death that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and The Weakest Link that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Pay Day
Avg. played:
2.552.553020134
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pay Day that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.842.835131248
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
2.842.841417910
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.837051793
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
2.842.836260852
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Eradicate that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.841505595
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
2.832.831275720
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
2.812.814833502
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Already Dead that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.862.863226170
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
2.792.791537026
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.772754854
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.862.857777778
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.764040562
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Regicide
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Regicide that play both.
Rob the Rich (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.750199521
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.777166437
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.757559958
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Blue) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
2.812.806779661
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.744420446
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
1.631.632459565
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.742358079
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
2.732.728842832
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played:
2.672.675000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
2.662.663346614
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Yellow) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Blue) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.837369520
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.782.782882463
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.674625915
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
2.732.731454006
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.632718894
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.242.241666667
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Concealed Blade that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.082.084870849
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.592517007
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.718283582
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Blue) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Throw Dagger that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.642.643913538
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.846751565
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.842.835985312
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.772.770833333
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.592.594278283
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.512.509380863
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Inertia Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.513282732
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played:
2.422.417266187
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.619254959
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.702023299
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Remembrance that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plague Hive that play both.