banner
Coercive Tendency
5290 decks (0.9371%)
Price History
Coercive Tendency
Assassin Attack Reaction
Arakni Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Arakni.) Look at the top 3 cards of the defending hero's deck. Put them back in any order, then banish the top card of their deck. If you complete a contract this way, your Assassin attacks get go again this combat chain.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.543.540940495
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.832.831615555
Hero
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Arakni
Arakni
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni that play both.
New
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
New
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Equipment
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Flick Knives that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
New
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Redback Shroud that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shriek Razors that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Balance of Justice that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Crown of Providence that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Graven Call that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orbitoclast that play both.
New
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833942941
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Frailty that play both.
New
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Kiss of Death that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.775362319
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and The Weakest Link that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.582417582
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Pay Day
Pay Day
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.539906103
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pay Day that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.838612670
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.846344999
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.842819031
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.842538976
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Eradicate that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.849370504
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.827114428
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.824503311
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Already Dead that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.869673406
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.787057938
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.782306163
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.858280922
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.768388792
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Red)
Rob the Rich (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.751608752
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Red) that play both.
Regicide
Regicide
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Regicide that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.782032401
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.759840274
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Blue) that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
New
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.796875000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pain in the Backside that play both.
New
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.716312057
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.661.655457227
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.752263374
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.709939148
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.594164456
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Yellow) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Blue) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Blue)
Rob the Rich (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Attack Reaction
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.846546129
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.786687227
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.677995194
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.737906772
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Just a Nick that play both.
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
New
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.633367140
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.235005658
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Concealed Blade that play both.
New
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.082.078976641
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.593796160
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Blue) that play both.
New
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Throw Dagger that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Yellow)
Cut to the Chase (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.651612903
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Yellow) that play both.
New
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852337786
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.840968586
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fate Foreseen that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.605653710
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Frailty Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.513487476
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.513347023
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Inertia Trap that play both.
New
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.618950586
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.704398448
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Remembrance that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plague Hive that play both.