Mechanical Strength (Red)
Mechanologist Attack Action - Attack
Evo Upgrade - This gets +X[Power], where X is the number of Evos you have equipped.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.024.016308242
Average Defense Value:
2.852.852190908
Hero
Teklovossen
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Teklovossen that play both.
Professor Teklovossen
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Professor Teklovossen that play both.
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate that play both.
Equipment
Cogwerx Base Legs
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Cogwerx Base Legs that play both.
Cogwerx Base Chest
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Cogwerx Base Chest that play both.
Cogwerx Base Arms
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Cogwerx Base Arms that play both.
Cogwerx Base Head
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Cogwerx Base Head that play both.
Proto Base Chest
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Proto Base Chest that play both.
Proto Base Head
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Proto Base Head that play both.
Proto Base Legs
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Proto Base Legs that play both.
Proto Base Arms
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Proto Base Arms that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Teklo Base Head
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Teklo Base Head that play both.
Teklo Base Arms
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Teklo Base Arms that play both.
Teklo Base Legs
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Teklo Base Legs that play both.
Teklo Base Chest
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Teklo Base Chest that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Evo Zoom Call
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Zoom Call that play both.
Evo Zip Line
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Zip Line that play both.
Evo Buzz Hive
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Buzz Hive that play both.
Evo Whizz Bang
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Whizz Bang that play both.
Weapon
Teklo Leveler
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Teklo Leveler that play both.
Teklo Plasma Pistol
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Teklo Plasma Pistol that play both.
Teklo Blaster
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Teklo Blaster that play both.
Action
Singularity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Singularity that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Memory
Avg. played:
2.542.536708861
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Memory that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Processor
Avg. played:
2.542.544743701
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Processor that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played:
2.522.524914089
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played:
2.532.528596187
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Evo Sentry Base Head
Avg. played:
1.951.948571429
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Sentry Base Head that play both.
Evo Sentry Base Arms
Avg. played:
1.921.917953668
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Sentry Base Arms that play both.
Evo Sentry Base Chest
Avg. played:
1.921.924951267
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Sentry Base Chest that play both.
Evo Sentry Base Legs
Avg. played:
1.921.922624878
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Sentry Base Legs that play both.
Evo Magneto
Avg. played:
2.392.388888889
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Magneto that play both.
Scrap Trader
Avg. played:
2.572.569811321
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Scrap Trader that play both.
Evo Command Center
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Command Center that play both.
Evo Thruster
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Thruster that play both.
Evo Engine Room
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Engine Room that play both.
Evo Smoothbore
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Smoothbore that play both.
Evo Scatter Shot
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Scatter Shot that play both.
Evo Energy Matrix
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Energy Matrix that play both.
Evo Rapid Fire
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Rapid Fire that play both.
Evo Tekloscope
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Evo Tekloscope that play both.
Attack Action
Terminator Tank
Avg. played:
2.712.714166667
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Terminator Tank that play both.
War Machine
Avg. played:
2.742.744313012
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and War Machine that play both.
Mechanical Strength (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.652.653116531
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Mechanical Strength (Blue) that play both.
Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.591796875
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Red) that play both.
Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.641245972
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Blue) that play both.
Meganetic Protocol
Avg. played:
2.722.723226704
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Meganetic Protocol that play both.
Annihilator Engine
Avg. played:
2.452.451006711
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Annihilator Engine that play both.
Pulsewave Protocol
Avg. played:
2.752.747330961
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Pulsewave Protocol that play both.
Junkyard Dogg (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.682274247
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Junkyard Dogg (Red) that play both.
Junkyard Dogg (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.673876872
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Junkyard Dogg (Blue) that play both.
Heavy Artillery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.630293160
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Heavy Artillery (Blue) that play both.
Scrap Compactor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.599374022
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Scrap Compactor (Blue) that play both.
Heavy Artillery (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.556701031
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Heavy Artillery (Red) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.621276596
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Zero to Sixty (Red) that play both.
Scrap Compactor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.562005277
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Scrap Compactor (Red) that play both.
Throttle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.638036810
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Throttle (Red) that play both.
Scrap Hopper (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.607594937
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Scrap Hopper (Blue) that play both.
Demolition Protocol
Avg. played:
2.642.641891892
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Demolition Protocol that play both.
Zipper Hit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.616393443
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Zipper Hit (Red) that play both.
Throttle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.609836066
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Throttle (Blue) that play both.
Scrap Prospector (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.670289855
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Scrap Prospector (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.552.552287582
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Zero to Sixty (Blue) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
T-Bone (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and T-Bone (Blue) that play both.
Hydraulic Press (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.566820276
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Hydraulic Press (Red) that play both.
Hydraulic Press (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Hydraulic Press (Blue) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Zipper Hit (Blue) that play both.
T-Bone (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and T-Bone (Red) that play both.
Scrap Hopper (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Scrap Hopper (Red) that play both.
Under Loop (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Under Loop (Red) that play both.
Apocalypse Automaton
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Apocalypse Automaton that play both.
Scrap Prospector (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Scrap Prospector (Red) that play both.
Dive Through Data (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Dive Through Data (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.779005525
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.762.757105943
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Steel Street Enforcement
Avg. played:
2.732.731971154
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Steel Street Enforcement that play both.
Firewall (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.617693523
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Firewall (Red) that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Fabricate
Avg. played:
2.592.587261146
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Fabricate that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mechanical Strength (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.