Seeping Shadows (Blue)
Shadow Runeblade Action
You may play Seeping Shadows from your banished zone.
The next attack action card with cost 0 you play this turn gains +1 [Power] and go again.
Go again
Blood Debt (At the beginning of your end phase, if Seeping Shadows is in your banished zone, lose 1[Life].)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.831.828709399
Average Defense Value:
2.452.452051550
Hero
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Chane that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Chane, Bound by Shadow
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Chane, Bound by Shadow that play both.
Vynnset
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Vynnset that play both.
Equipment
Face Purgatory
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Carrion Husk
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Carrion Husk that play both.
Crown of Providence
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Aether Ironweave
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Ebon Fold
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Dance of Darkness
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Balance of Justice
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Nullrune Robe
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Time Skippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Crown of Dominion
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Weapon
Rosetta Thorn
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Flail of Agony
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Scepter of Pain
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Action
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
2.782.784313725
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.716216216
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.162.163793103
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.640000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Sigil of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Sigil of the Arknight that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
2.282.279569892
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Captain's Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.460784314
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Captain's Call (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.831.828947368
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.182.176470588
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Captain's Call (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.931.927710843
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Captain's Call (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.512.510204082
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Lead the Charge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.391.390243902
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Lead the Charge (Yellow) that play both.
Seeping Shadows (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.331.333333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Seeping Shadows (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.303030303
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Emissary of Tides
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Emissary of Tides that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Seeds of Agony (Blue) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Putrid Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Chains of Mephetis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Chains of Mephetis that play both.
Starting Stake
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Starting Stake that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.541666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Vile Inquisition (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Torment
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Tome of Torment that play both.
Dimenxxional Gateway (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Dimenxxional Gateway (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Soul Reaping
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Soul Reaping that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
2.752.745562130
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.722543353
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.725609756
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.717948718
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Bounding Demigon (Blue) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.730263158
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Unhallowed Rites (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.721854305
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Unhallowed Rites (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.764705882
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.778688525
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Belittle (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
2.772.769230769
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Snuff Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Snuff Out that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.702.696969697
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
2.402.402298851
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.212.206185567
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Bounding Demigon (Yellow) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
2.322.320754717
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.262.264705882
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.082.081632653
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Belittle (Yellow) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Unhallowed Rites (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.311.312500000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Unhallowed Rites (Blue) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Drowning Dire (Blue) that play both.
Exude Confidence
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Exude Confidence that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Rift Bind (Yellow) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Standing Order that play both.
Rift Bind (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.416666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Rift Bind (Blue) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.538461538
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Flock of the Feather Walkers (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Flock of the Feather Walkers (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Vantom Banshee (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Dabble in Darkness
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Dabble in Darkness that play both.
Deathly Delight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Deathly Delight (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.631578947
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Instant
Eclipse
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Eclipse that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.812.806896552
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Art of War that play both.
Invert Existence
Avg. played:
2.162.158620690
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Invert Existence that play both.
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Blue) and Oblivion that play both.