Standing Order
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks or defends, you may put a card from your arsenal on the bottom of your deck. If you do, this gets +2{p} and +2{d}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.922.918508009
Average Defense Value: Β
2.662.664958447
Hero
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Balance of Justice that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Mask of Momentum
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Flick Knives
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Flick Knives that play both.
Tide Flippers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tide Flippers that play both.
Traverse the Universe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Traverse the Universe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Storm Striders that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Meridian Pathway
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Ironsong Versus
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Refraction Bolters
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Breaking Scales
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Breaking Scales that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Metacarpus Node
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Lightning Greaves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Perch Grapplers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Prized Galea
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Prized Galea that play both.
Weapon
Redspine Manta
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Redspine Manta that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Spider's Bite
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spider's Bite that play both.
Waning Moon
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Waning Moon that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Dreadbore
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dreadbore that play both.
Scale Peeler
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Scale Peeler that play both.
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.782.776188043
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dual Threat that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.662.658436214
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and The Weakest Link that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
1.641.642857143
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Midas Touch that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Truce that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Rage Specter that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and This Round's on Me that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Swell Tidings that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Drop the Anchor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Drop the Anchor that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Premeditate that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Diamond Amulet that play both.
10,000 Year Reunion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and 10,000 Year Reunion that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Murky Water
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Murky Water that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.742.741466370
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.702.703014753
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Bam Bam
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Bam Bam that play both.
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Swift Shot that play both.
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.404914530
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.260040844
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.381367292
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ripple Away that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dishonor that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Already Dead that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sea Legs that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Shake Down that play both.
Endless Arrow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Endless Arrow that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Lord of Wind that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Censor that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Eradicate that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Provoke that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Jagged Edge that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746057939
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807899461
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.702.701936188
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
2.612.606306306
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Hold the Line that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Tarpit Trap
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tarpit Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and That All You Got? that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Frailty Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.534798535
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.512.513440860
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
Return Fire
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Return Fire that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.861.857142857
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.563517915
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.545721477
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Pass Over that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Stir the Pot that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.401.402654867
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Remembrance that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Art of War that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Path Well Traveled that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Dense Blue Mist
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dense Blue Mist that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Kindle that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.