Standing Order
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks or defends, you may put a card from your arsenal on the bottom of your deck. If you do, this gets +2{p} and +2{d}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.922.923459563
Average Defense Value: Β
2.662.663085999
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Traverse the Universe
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Meridian Pathway
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Flick Knives
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Flick Knives that play both.
Heavy Industry Gear Shift
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Heavy Industry Gear Shift that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Storm Striders
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Storm Striders that play both.
Tide Flippers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tide Flippers that play both.
Mask of Momentum
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Ironsong Versus
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Refraction Bolters
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Lightning Greaves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Calming Gesture
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Calming Gesture that play both.
Breaking Scales
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Breaking Scales that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Tectonic Crust
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Sharp Shooters
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Waves of Aqua Marine
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Waves of Aqua Marine that play both.
Metacarpus Node
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Heavy Industry Ram Stop
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Heavy Industry Ram Stop that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Perch Grapplers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Longdraw Half-Glove
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Longdraw Half-Glove that play both.
Mask of Perdition
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Prized Galea
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Prized Galea that play both.
Crown of Reflection
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Spider's Bite
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Waning Moon
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Waning Moon that play both.
Scale Peeler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Scale Peeler that play both.
Dreadbore
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dreadbore that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Graven Call
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Graven Call that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.762.759389671
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Codex of Frailty that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.622.618794326
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and The Weakest Link that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Rage Specter that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Truce that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
10,000 Year Reunion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and 10,000 Year Reunion that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and This Round's on Me that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Swell Tidings that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Premeditate that play both.
Murky Water
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Murky Water that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Essence of Ancestry: Mind that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.732.730147738
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.692.690109890
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.379663057
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.338235294
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ripple Away that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Already Dead that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dishonor that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Shake Down that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Eradicate that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Lord of Wind that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Endless Arrow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Endless Arrow that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Current Funnel that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Plow Under that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.736953307
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.702.696850394
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
2.612.614325069
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Hold the Line that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.548764629
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Frailty Trap that play both.
Tarpit Trap
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tarpit Trap that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.512.505050505
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Inertia Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and That All You Got? that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.382.375000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Instant
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.540740741
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Pass Over that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.521572387
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.431.434210526
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Remembrance that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Dense Blue Mist
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dense Blue Mist that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Kindle that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Art of War that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Heart of Fyendal that play both.