Succumb to Temptation
Runeblade Action
If you've dealt arcane damage this turn, you may play this as though it were an instant.
The next time a Runeblade attack action card you control hits a hero this turn, look at their hand and choose a card. They discard it.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.042.037117556
Average Defense Value:
2.652.654978775
Hero
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Viserai, Rune Blood
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Vynnset
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Vynnset that play both.
Equipment
Spellbound Creepers
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Face Purgatory
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Face Purgatory that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Ebon Fold
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Ebon Fold that play both.
Crown of Providence
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Crown of Providence that play both.
Bloodied Oval
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Aether Ironweave
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Carrion Husk
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Carrion Husk that play both.
Nullrune Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Dance of Darkness
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Balance of Justice that play both.
Weapon
Reaping Blade
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Reaping Blade that play both.
Flail of Agony
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Flail of Agony that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Nebula Blade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Nebula Blade that play both.
Action
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.932.925661132
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.912.908841340
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Cull
Avg. played:
2.892.887570394
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Cull that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
2.902.897418420
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.732.725675537
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.772.770633622
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
2.882.876118376
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
2.872.873599779
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Mordred Tide that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Become the Arknight that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.793918919
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.792.791027155
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Funeral Moon that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.701926709
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.424932336
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.660024600
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.252554148
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
2.592.592219020
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Rattle Bones that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.462.461309524
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.588514226
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
2.882.883313733
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.875196644
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
2.872.866462113
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.872.871620645
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.818071190
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.789752918
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.662.663086879
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Snuff Out
Avg. played:
2.832.829548061
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Snuff Out that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Runerager Swarm (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.718921498
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.621404509
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Rune Flash (Blue) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
2.712.711552091
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Vexing Malice that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
2.432.434001796
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Call for Backup
Avg. played:
2.302.296089385
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Call for Backup that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Runerager Swarm (Yellow) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.648366606
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Dread Triptych that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.871266735
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.787157611
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.672.671559633
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
2.802.803796591
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Oblivion that play both.
Invert Existence
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Invert Existence that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Succumb to Temptation and Arknight Shard that play both.