Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.192.189211080
Average Defense Value:
2.372.365796782
Formats
Number Played
Average number played (CC):
2.802.797802198
Average number played (Blitz):
1.851.847560976
Hero
Equipment
Grasp of the Arknight
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Aether Ironweave
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Dominion
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Shock Charmers
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Weapon
Rosetta Thorn
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Reaping Blade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Action
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Force of Nature
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.842.837647059
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
2.902.901287554
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Exude Confidence
Avg. played:
2.842.837892604
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
2.802.797266515
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
2.812.806451613
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Looming Doom that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
2.622.624810893
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.802.800000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.322.315539739
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
1.761.756286267
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.342.342553191
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Weave Earth (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.762863535
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Weave Earth (Blue) that play both.
Amulet of Earth
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amulet of Earth that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Cryptic Crossing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Cryptic Crossing that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.540160643
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Duet (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.597597598
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Duet (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Red) that play both.
Captain's Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Captain's Call (Blue) that play both.
Captain's Call (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Captain's Call (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.362.357366771
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
2.632.628205128
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Diabolic Ultimatum
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Diabolic Ultimatum that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
2.532.533123028
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Electrify (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Electrify (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Burgeoning (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.505190311
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Burgeoning (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Evergreen (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Evergreen (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Ball Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Ball Lightning (Red) that play both.
Evergreen (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Evergreen (Yellow) that play both.
Sting of Sorcery
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sting of Sorcery that play both.
Tome of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Tome of the Arknight that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Weave Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Weave Lightning (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Ball Lightning (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Ball Lightning (Yellow) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Vigor Rush (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vigor Rush (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.815967524
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.381957774
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arknight Shard that play both.