Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Runeblade Defense Reaction
Deal 1 arcane damage to the attacking hero.
If you have dealt arcane damage this turn, Sigil of Suffering gains +1 [Defense].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.132.132898730
Average Defense Value:
2.492.488931853
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Viserai, Rune Blood
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Aurora
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Aurora that play both.
Briar
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Briar that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Vynnset
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vynnset that play both.
New
Florian
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Florian that play both.
Equipment
Grasp of the Arknight
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Crown of Providence
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Bloodied Oval
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Balance of Justice
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Aether Ironweave
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Ebon Fold
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Crown of Dominion
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Carrion Husk
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Carrion Husk that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Shock Charmers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Weapon
Rosetta Thorn
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Scepter of Pain
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Flail of Agony
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Reaping Blade
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Reaping Blade that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Action
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
2.822.819951338
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.790337284
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.734208881
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.642.644619941
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.831325301
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.822.821352616
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
2.762.757311218
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.712.707210031
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.740947075
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
2.812.805513017
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.802.795659079
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Force of Nature
Avg. played:
2.722.719904077
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.662.658679707
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played:
2.702.702991453
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
2.762.764622974
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Looming Doom that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.723863636
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played:
2.712.710691824
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.689674523
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.737588652
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.662375658
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
2.752.750177431
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
2.752.749629630
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.697872340
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played:
2.432.428015564
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
2.522.523255814
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.562.556818182
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Runeblood Barrier
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runeblood Barrier that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Chains of Mephetis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Chains of Mephetis that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.528114664
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Amulet of Earth
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amulet of Earth that play both.
Weave Earth (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Weave Earth (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
2.782.775225356
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
2.792.787366046
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.772.765042980
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.774212369
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
2.762.760167464
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.762.758261657
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.774305556
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.742.738304771
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.733695652
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.754565376
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.762.761398176
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.702463054
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.705941591
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.702309237
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.689330544
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.677139762
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
2.692.688729875
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
2.692.686730506
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Exude Confidence
Avg. played:
2.632.631181319
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played:
2.672.673197492
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Duet (Blue) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.442910916
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Duet (Red) that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.537527594
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.838646532
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.768063345
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Oblivion that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.670801527
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arknight Shard that play both.