Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Runeblade Defense Reaction
Deal 1 arcane damage to the attacking hero.
If you have dealt arcane damage this turn, Sigil of Suffering gains +1 [Defense].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.382.378540307
Average Defense Value:
2.482.481307664
Hero
Aurora, Shooting Star
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Aurora
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Aurora that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Viserai, Rune Blood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Briar
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Briar that play both.
Vynnset
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vynnset that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Equipment
Grasp of the Arknight
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Crown of Providence
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Lightning Greaves
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Face Purgatory
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Aether Ironweave
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Shock Charmers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Balance of Justice
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Dominion
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Bloodied Oval
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Nullrune Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Well Grounded
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Spell Fray Tiara
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Spell Fray Tiara that play both.
Ebon Fold
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Carrion Husk
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Carrion Husk that play both.
Arcane Lantern
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Weapon
Star Fall
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Reaping Blade
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Scepter of Pain
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Flail of Agony
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Flail of Agony that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Action
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
2.882.884160266
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played:
2.882.879610443
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.794238683
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.765645806
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.734275618
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Flicker Wisp
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Flicker Wisp that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.722.719281664
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Force of Nature
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Germinate that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Looming Doom that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
2.572.565476190
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Electrify (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Electrify (Blue) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
2.892.885095939
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Current Funnel that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
2.882.884272997
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.880073378
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.824645749
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.816888889
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.832.831861103
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.790974529
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.790334914
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.809541352
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
2.812.810079782
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.833061889
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.760190476
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.772.768338795
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Exude Confidence
Avg. played:
2.712.707903780
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
Heaven's Claws (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Heaven's Claws (Blue) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.717872969
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.712523364
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Snuff Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Snuff Out that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.662151394
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
2.602.603828548
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Blue) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Photon Rush (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Photon Rush (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.831342669
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.757615645
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
2.882.882946735
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.878125000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.705232943
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.723001137
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
2.732.730371505
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Blink
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Blink that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.700036941
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Oblivion that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Suffering (Red) and Arknight Shard that play both.