Blinding Beam (Blue)
Light Generic Instant
Blinding Beam costs [1 Resource] less to play if it targets a Shadow card.
Target attacking or defending attack action card gets -1 [Power].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
5.025.020048829
Average Defense Value:
2.832.834940645
Hero
Prism
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Prism that play both.
Prism, Awakener of Sol
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Prism, Advent of Thrones
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Prism, Advent of Thrones that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Prism, Sculptor of Arc Light
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Prism, Sculptor of Arc Light that play both.
Equipment
Halo of Illumination
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Dream Weavers
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Silent Stilettos
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Wave of Reality
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ironhide Legs
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Warband of Bellona
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Warband of Bellona that play both.
Ironrot Legs
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Nullrune Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironhide Helm
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Plate
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Vestige of Sol
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Ironrot Plate
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironrot Plate that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Time Skippers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Radiant Flow
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant Flow that play both.
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Radiant Touch
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant Touch that play both.
Radiant View
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant View that play both.
Ironrot Helm
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Crown of Reflection
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Deep Blue
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Diadem of Dreamstate
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Diadem of Dreamstate that play both.
Radiant Raiment
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant Raiment that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Iris of Reality
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Iris of Reality that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Luminaris that play both.
Reality Refractor
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Reality Refractor that play both.
Action
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.532.526315789
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Phantasmify (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmify (Red) that play both.
Veiled Intentions (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Veiled Intentions (Red) that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Veiled Intentions (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Veiled Intentions (Blue) that play both.
Phantasmify (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmify (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.208333333
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.200000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.112.107142857
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.132.125000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.312.309859155
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.292.294117647
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.122.115384615
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.122.117647059
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Avg. played:
1.891.891304348
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.282.283018868
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.302.301886792
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.981.979166667
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.841.843750000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Red) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.588235294
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.451612903
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Red) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Yellow) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.622.619047619
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Raging Onslaught (Yellow) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Brothers in Arms (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Illuminate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Illuminate (Red) that play both.
Illuminate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Illuminate (Blue) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Yellow) that play both.
Spectral Rider (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spectral Rider (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
2.582.583333333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Rising Solartide (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Rising Solartide (Blue) that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spectral Prowler (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.292.291666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.522.517241379
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Soul Shield that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Sink Below (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Blinding Beam (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.981.980000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Blinding Beam (Yellow) that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of War that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.687500000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Resolve (Red)
Avg. played:
1.531.533333333
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Resolve (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Blinding Beam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Blinding Beam (Red) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.442.437500000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Angelic Descent (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Descent (Blue) that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
2.622.615384615
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Parable of Humility that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
1.581.583333333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Genesis that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Angelic Descent (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Descent (Red) that play both.
Celestial Resolve (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Resolve (Yellow) that play both.
Angelic Descent (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Descent (Yellow) that play both.
Glisten (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Glisten (Blue) that play both.