Blinding Beam (Blue)
Light Generic Instant
Blinding Beam costs [1 Resource] less to play if it targets a Shadow card.
Target attacking or defending attack action card gets -1 [Power].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.994.993540483
Average Defense Value:
2.842.835947283
Hero
Prism
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Prism that play both.
Prism, Awakener of Sol
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Prism, Advent of Thrones
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Prism, Advent of Thrones that play both.
Equipment
Halo of Illumination
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Dream Weavers
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Silent Stilettos
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Wave of Reality
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ironhide Legs
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Ironrot Legs
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Nullrune Hood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Warband of Bellona
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Warband of Bellona that play both.
Ironhide Helm
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Plate
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Vestige of Sol
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Ironrot Plate
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironrot Plate that play both.
Time Skippers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Radiant Flow
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant Flow that play both.
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironrot Helm
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Crown of Reflection
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Deep Blue
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Radiant View
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant View that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Radiant Touch
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant Touch that play both.
Diadem of Dreamstate
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Diadem of Dreamstate that play both.
Radiant Raiment
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant Raiment that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Iris of Reality
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Iris of Reality that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Luminaris that play both.
Reality Refractor
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Reality Refractor that play both.
Action
Emissary of Tides
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Emissary of Tides that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.532.526315789
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Phantasmify (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmify (Red) that play both.
Veiled Intentions (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Veiled Intentions (Red) that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Veiled Intentions (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Veiled Intentions (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.208333333
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.280000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.112.105263158
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.322.315068493
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.142.140350877
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.302.300000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.112.113207547
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.122.115384615
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.282.277777778
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.302.301886792
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Red) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Blue) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.588235294
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.730769231
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Red) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.542.535714286
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Yellow) that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Raging Onslaught (Yellow) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Brothers in Arms (Yellow) that play both.
Illuminate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Illuminate (Red) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Illuminate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Illuminate (Blue) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Yellow) that play both.
Spectral Rider (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spectral Rider (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Rising Solartide (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Rising Solartide (Blue) that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spectral Prowler (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.282.280000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.532.533333333
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Soul Shield that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.384615385
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Instant
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Blinding Beam (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.981.980392157
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Blinding Beam (Yellow) that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of War that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Seduce Secrets
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Seduce Secrets that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Celestial Resolve (Red)
Avg. played:
1.531.533333333
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Resolve (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.769230769
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Blinding Beam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Blinding Beam (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.472.470588235
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Parable of Humility that play both.
Angelic Descent (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Descent (Blue) that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Genesis that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Resolve (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Resolve (Yellow) that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Angelic Descent (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Descent (Red) that play both.
Angelic Descent (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Descent (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Resolve (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Resolve (Blue) that play both.