Blinding Beam (Blue)
Light Generic Instant
Blinding Beam costs [1 Resource] less to play if it targets a Shadow card.
Target attacking or defending attack action card gets -1 [Power].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.904.898720745
Average Defense Value:
2.832.827218349
Hero
Prism
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Prism that play both.
Prism, Awakener of Sol
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Prism, Sculptor of Arc Light
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Prism, Sculptor of Arc Light that play both.
Equipment
Garland of Spring
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Garland of Spring that play both.
Halo of Illumination
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Dream Weavers
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Silent Stilettos
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Wave of Reality
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Calming Cloak
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Calming Cloak that play both.
Calming Gesture
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Nullrune Robe
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Solar Plexus
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Solar Plexus that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Legs
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Ironrot Legs
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Nullrune Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironhide Helm
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironhide Plate
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Time Skippers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Time Skippers that play both.
Radiant Flow
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant Flow that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Vestige of Sol
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Radiant View
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant View that play both.
Ironrot Plate
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironrot Plate that play both.
Warband of Bellona
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Warband of Bellona that play both.
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Radiant Raiment
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant Raiment that play both.
Radiant Touch
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Radiant Touch that play both.
Crown of Reflection
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Deep Blue
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ironrot Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Weapon
Iris of Reality
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Iris of Reality that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Luminaris that play both.
Action
Truce
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Truce that play both.
Single Minded Determination (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Single Minded Determination (Blue) that play both.
Astral Etchings (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Astral Etchings (Red) that play both.
Haunting Specter (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Haunting Specter (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solitude (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Sigil of Solitude (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solitude (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Sigil of Solitude (Yellow) that play both.
Solitary Companion (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Solitary Companion (Blue) that play both.
Solitary Companion (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Solitary Companion (Red) that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spectral Manifestations (Blue) that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Vengeful Apparition (Blue) that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Vengeful Apparition (Red) that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Vengeful Apparition (Yellow) that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.552.550000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Phantasmify (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmify (Red) that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Veiled Intentions (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Veiled Intentions (Red) that play both.
Veiled Intentions (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Veiled Intentions (Blue) that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Haze Bending that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Attack Action
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.202702703
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.202380952
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.112.114754098
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Blue) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.122.120689655
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.312.310810811
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.302.295774648
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.112.111111111
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.112.113207547
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Avg. played:
1.881.880000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.282.280701754
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.861.863636364
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.302.301886792
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.821.823529412
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.363636364
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Blue) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Red) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.522.517241379
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ripple Away that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.652.650000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Raging Onslaught (Yellow) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Brothers in Arms (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Illuminate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Illuminate (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Yellow) that play both.
Illuminate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Illuminate (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Spectral Rider (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spectral Rider (Blue) that play both.
Rising Solartide (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Rising Solartide (Blue) that play both.
Rising Solartide (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Rising Solartide (Yellow) that play both.
Rising Solartide (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Rising Solartide (Red) that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Spectral Prowler (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Provoke
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Provoke that play both.
War Cry of Bellona
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and War Cry of Bellona that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Put in Context
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Put in Context that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Saving Grace that play both.
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.562.562500000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Soul Shield that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.322.320000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.461538462
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Instant
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Blinding Beam (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.961.964285714
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Blinding Beam (Yellow) that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Celestial Resolve (Red)
Avg. played:
1.531.533333333
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Resolve (Red) that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of War that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.687500000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Blinding Beam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Blinding Beam (Red) that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.416666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.472.470588235
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Angelic Descent (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Descent (Blue) that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Parable of Humility that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Genesis that play both.
Angelic Descent (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Descent (Red) that play both.
Angelic Descent (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Angelic Descent (Yellow) that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Blue) and Ode to Wrath that play both.