Blinding Beam (Red)
Light Generic Instant
Blinding Beam costs [1 Resource] less to play if it targets a Shadow card.
Target attacking or defending attack action card gets -3 [Power].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.494.493510438
Average Defense Value:
2.812.806928504
Hero
Prism, Awakener of Sol
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Prism
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Prism that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Prism, Sculptor of Arc Light
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Prism, Sculptor of Arc Light that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Equipment
Halo of Illumination
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Dream Weavers
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Wave of Reality
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Silent Stilettos
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Warband of Bellona
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Warband of Bellona that play both.
Crown of Reflection
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Vestige of Sol
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Radiant Flow
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Radiant Flow that play both.
Nullrune Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironhide Helm
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Ironhide Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ironhide Plate
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Gallantry Gold
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Time Skippers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Ghostly Touch
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Ticket Puncher
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Ticket Puncher that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Iris of Reality
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Iris of Reality that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Luminaris that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Reality Refractor
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Reality Refractor that play both.
Action
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.802.800000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
2.792.791666667
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.702.703703704
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Great Library of Solana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Great Library of Solana that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Haze Bending that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Seek Enlightenment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Seek Enlightenment (Red) that play both.
Lumina Ascension
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Lumina Ascension that play both.
Dissolve Reality
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Dissolve Reality that play both.
Attack Action
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.732.725806452
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.723577236
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.882.882978723
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.645161290
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.822.824175824
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.660000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.687500000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.682.681318681
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.689655172
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.822.818181818
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.582.581081081
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.339622642
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.547169811
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.482.481481481
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Tenacity (Blue) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Illuminate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Illuminate (Red) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.662.656250000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.487804878
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.392.393939394
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Enigma Chimera (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.522.515151515
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.482.480000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Phantasmaclasm
Avg. played:
2.542.541666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Phantasmaclasm that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Enigma Chimera (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.082.083333333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Spears of Surreality (Blue) that play both.
Illuminate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Illuminate (Blue) that play both.
V of the Vanguard
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and V of the Vanguard that play both.
Banneret of Courage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Banneret of Courage that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Phantasmal Haze (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Enigma Chimera (Yellow) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Bolt of Courage (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Beacon of Victory
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Beacon of Victory that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Defense Reaction
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.752.754237288
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Soul Shield that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.734042553
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.662.661016949
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Flicker Trick that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Figment of War that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.740000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.452.445945946
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.382.378378378
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Genesis that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.591836735
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
2.582.576271186
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.312.305084746
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
2.172.172413793
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Parable of Humility that play both.
Tome of Divinity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Tome of Divinity that play both.
Prismatic Shield (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Prismatic Shield (Red) that play both.
Blinding Beam (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.981.977272727
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Blinding Beam (Yellow) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.518518519
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Phantom Tidemaw
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Phantom Tidemaw that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.572.565217391
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Angelic Descent (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Angelic Descent (Red) that play both.
Celestial Resolve (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Celestial Resolve (Red) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Blinding Beam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Blinding Beam (Blue) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Angelic Descent (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Angelic Descent (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Light of Sol
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Light of Sol that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blinding Beam (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.