banner
Zealous Belting (Red)
26903 decks (3.914%)
Price History
Zealous Belting (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
While there is a card in your pitch zone with [Power] greater than Zealous Belting's base [Power], Zealous Belting has go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
5.775.766488230
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.822.822548584
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Bravo
Bravo
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Sunkwater Lookout
Sunkwater Lookout
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sunkwater Lookout that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
Anothos
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Visit Goldmane Estate
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.892723329
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.813971648
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Show Time!
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.779195402
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.732552083
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.725901639
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.639412998
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
2.122.116488368
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
1.951.954838710
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Surface Shaking
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Promising Terrain
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Promising Terrain that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857154636
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.877549290
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.874844574
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.872182399
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875811017
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852756700
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.853660772
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.880141630
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852268145
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.888134701
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834991543
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834145522
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852105418
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.862075436
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.845639416
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.763772750
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Headbutt
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.401.397521230
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666943349
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Pec Perfect
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pec Perfect that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
New
Clash of Mountains (Blue)
Clash of Mountains (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Mountains (Blue) that play both.
New
Flatten the Field (Blue)
Flatten the Field (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Flatten the Field (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.577353342
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636991193
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.540540541
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
New
Grind Them Down (Red)
Grind Them Down (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Grind Them Down (Red) that play both.
Break Stature
Break Stature
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Break Stature that play both.
Call for Backup
Call for Backup
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Call for Backup that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714155376
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.585108769
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835280771
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.759858509
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.617316244
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.568283655
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
New
Solid Ground
Solid Ground
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Solid Ground that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.899580827
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Trounce
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.906552648
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.672276678
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.377228732
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
New
Seismic Eruption
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Seismic Eruption that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.