Zealous Belting (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
While there is a card in your pitch zone with [Power] greater than Zealous Belting's base [Power], Zealous Belting has go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.775.765445986
Average Defense Value: Β
2.822.822416927
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Bravo
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Boots
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Civic Steps
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tectonic Plating
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Aurum Aegis
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crater Fist
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Balance of Justice
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Ironrot Legs
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Crown of Dominion
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Craterhoof
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Time Skippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Base of the Mountain
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.892.893018682
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814184737
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.782.779383098
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.732.732451019
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Promising Terrain that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.732.725605763
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.642.636929461
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.122.116988810
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
1.981.975308642
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Overswing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Overswing (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.857307297
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.882.877684762
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.875010690
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.872335845
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.882.875841696
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.852984944
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.853897143
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.880330951
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.852260143
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.892.888386995
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834954830
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.833994968
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.852.852074917
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
2.852.851063830
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.862.862185189
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
2.852.845515176
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.763911067
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.401.397431487
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.669344870
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.582.577572128
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.637571157
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Fault Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fault Line that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
2.552.551724138
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pec Perfect that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714103789
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.585273053
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.835511798
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.762.759571410
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.618065527
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.568455854
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.902.899672549
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.912.906565137
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672582732
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.377382465
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.