banner
Zealous Belting (Red)
27034 decks (3.774%)
Price History
Zealous Belting (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
While there is a card in your pitch zone with [Power] greater than Zealous Belting's base [Power], Zealous Belting has go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
5.765.764694036
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.822.822274960
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Bravo
Bravo
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
New
Ironfist Revelation
Ironfist Revelation
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ironfist Revelation that play both.
New
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Testament of Valahai
Testament of Valahai
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Testament of Valahai that play both.
New
Boots to the Boards
Boots to the Boards
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Boots to the Boards that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
Anothos
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Visit Goldmane Estate
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.892997640
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.814398469
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Show Time!
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.779418498
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.732651476
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.726260642
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
New
Song of Sinew
Song of Sinew
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Song of Sinew that play both.
Promising Terrain
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Promising Terrain that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636174636
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
2.122.117039295
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckle that play both.
New
Humble Entrance
Humble Entrance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Humble Entrance that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
1.981.975757576
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Surface Shaking
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
New
Heroic Grit
Heroic Grit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Heroic Grit that play both.
New
Beat the Same Drum
Beat the Same Drum
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Beat the Same Drum that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857412653
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.877670805
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.872452051
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875911142
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.853051766
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.853874606
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.880354727
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852222446
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.888463354
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834870117
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833966693
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852446988
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Vigorous Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.862175294
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
New
Buckwild (Yellow)
Buckwild (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckwild (Yellow) that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.845777898
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Blue)
Buckwild (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckwild (Blue) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Red)
Buckwild (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckwild (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.763962195
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
New
Reckless Stampede
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Reckless Stampede that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.401.396929071
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
New
Jaws of Victory
Jaws of Victory
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Jaws of Victory that play both.
New
Wind Up the Crowd
Wind Up the Crowd
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wind Up the Crowd that play both.
New
Energetic Impact
Energetic Impact
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Energetic Impact that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
New
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Smashing Ground that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714285714
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Strongest Survive (Blue) that play both.
New
Crowd Goes Wild
Crowd Goes Wild
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crowd Goes Wild that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tough Smashup (Blue) that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Unexpected Backhand (Blue)
Unexpected Backhand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unexpected Backhand (Blue) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
New
Flex Speed (Red)
Flex Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Flex Speed (Red) that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tough Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.669066228
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Put 'Em In Their Place
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.577445652
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.638000474
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
New
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Show of Strength that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.200000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
New
Dig In (Yellow)
Dig In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Dig In (Yellow) that play both.
New
Disarm
Disarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disarm that play both.
New
Good Natured Brutality
Good Natured Brutality
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Good Natured Brutality that play both.
New
Rough Up (Red)
Rough Up (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rough Up (Red) that play both.
New
Old Leather and Vim
Old Leather and Vim
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Old Leather and Vim that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.561797753
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Blow for a Blow that play both.
New
Dig In (Blue)
Dig In (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Dig In (Blue) that play both.
New
Unexpected Backhand (Yellow)
Unexpected Backhand (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unexpected Backhand (Yellow) that play both.
New
Chest Puff
Chest Puff
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chest Puff that play both.
New
Give 'Em a Piece of Your Mind (Blue)
Give 'Em a Piece of Your Mind (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Give 'Em a Piece of Your Mind (Blue) that play both.
Pec Perfect
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pec Perfect that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Fault Line
Fault Line
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fault Line that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714084571
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.585551331
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835603278
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.759713168
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.618011208
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.568371912
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Solid Ground
Solid Ground
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Solid Ground that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.899627239
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Trounce
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.906593972
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.672515700
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Seismic Eruption
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Seismic Eruption that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.378899315
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Blue)
Act of Glory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Act of Glory (Blue) that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Red)
Act of Glory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Act of Glory (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
New
Tension in the Air (Red)
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
New
The Suspense is Killing Me
The Suspense is Killing Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and The Suspense is Killing Me that play both.
New
Numbskull Charm
Numbskull Charm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Numbskull Charm that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.