Zealous Belting (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
While there is a card in your pitch zone with [Power] greater than Zealous Belting's base [Power], Zealous Belting has go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.795.787517179
Average Defense Value: Β
2.822.823556741
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Bravo
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Victor Goldmane
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Terra
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Terra that play both.
Jarl VetreiΔi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Civic Steps
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tectonic Plating
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Aurum Aegis
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crater Fist
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Hood
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Ironrot Legs
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Crown of Dominion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Time Skippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Tectonic Crust
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Nullrune Robe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Summit, the Unforgiving
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
2.922.917808219
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.832.826185835
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.822.815055581
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.782.783197171
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729140461
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.732.728229665
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.102.097474208
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.849847995
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.872.870128600
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.869184617
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.866834792
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.872.869476207
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.846246487
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.848775126
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.868981481
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.851184462
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.842.835904076
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.882.879060378
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.827581816
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.902.895184136
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.832.832828643
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.872.865334923
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.872.873949580
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
2.852.851054417
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.765459831
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.804890474
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.601.602017817
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672418301
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.623713992
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.542.536774629
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.592901235
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.699319656
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.584672723
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.836418970
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.762.761160714
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.621585251
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.578325736
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.882.882326060
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.892.888715549
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.582.575757576
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.675450237
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.378059315
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Remembrance that play both.