banner
Zealous Belting (Red)
16742 decks (5.451%)
Price History
Zealous Belting (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
While there is a card in your pitch zone with [Power] greater than Zealous Belting's base [Power], Zealous Belting has go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
5.765.761289264
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.832.827622211
Hero
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Bravo
Bravo
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
Crown of Seeds
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Legs
Ironhide Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
Anothos
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.839123631
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Show Time!
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.607147169
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.739401496
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
2.082.078968737
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.638771186
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.874374177
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.891412445
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.888102369
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.889241789
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.889307745
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.866680590
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870221255
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.923347280
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.871297629
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.845614035
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.895897736
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.845501004
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875027920
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.862880886
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.837886313
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797974114
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.611.612662014
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.693235832
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.514666667
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.544008484
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.696014277
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.602872063
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.858447489
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.775708635
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.629635123
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.603696591
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.371561410
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Trounce
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Test of Vigor
Test of Vigor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Test of Vigor that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.685562633
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.372557726
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zealous Belting (Red) and Remembrance that play both.