Root-Bound Trunks
Guardian Equipment - Legs
When this defends together with an aura card, create an Embodiment of Earth token.
Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.273.274047382
Average Defense Value: Β
2.712.712566306
Hero
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Nullrune Boots
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Coronet Peak
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Coronet Peak that play both.
Heart of Ice
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Heart of Ice that play both.
Crown of Providence
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Tectonic Plating
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Tectonic Crust
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Robe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Titan's Fist
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Titan's Fist that play both.
Redwood Hammer
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Anothos
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Anothos that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Imposing Visage that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814814815
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Tear Asunder that play both.
Ice Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.798076923
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Ice Quake (Red) that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.603896104
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Winter's Bite (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Buckle that play both.
Nerves of Steel
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Nerves of Steel that play both.
Stamp Authority
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Stamp Authority that play both.
Emerging Avalanche (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Emerging Avalanche (Blue) that play both.
Ice Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Ice Quake (Blue) that play both.
Cold Snap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Cold Snap (Blue) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and The Weakest Link that play both.
Attack Action
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Oaken Old that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Mangle that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.932.926444834
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Command and Conquer that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.902.898263027
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Spinal Crush that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Plow Under that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Snow Under (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Snow Under (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Glacial Footsteps (Red) that play both.
Icy Encounter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Icy Encounter (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Cranial Crush that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.818713450
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.569536424
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.662.659615385
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Instant
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β
2.782.783882784
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Blizzard that play both.
Exposed to the Elements
Avg. played: Β
1.841.843003413
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Exposed to the Elements that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.342.338345865
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Remembrance that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Root-Bound Trunks and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.