Snow Under (Red)
Elemental Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Ice Fusion (As an additional cost to play Snow Under, you may reveal an Ice card from your hand.)
If Snow Under was fused, it gains "If this hits a hero, create a Frostbite token under their control."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.993.991074361
Average Defense Value:
2.672.667957067
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Oldhim
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Oldhim that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity that play both.
Equipment
Quickdodge Flexors
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Boots
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Civic Steps
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Hood
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Heart of Ice
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Tectonic Plating
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Crater Fist
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Ironhide Legs
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Craterhoof
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Coronet Peak
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Coronet Peak that play both.
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Ironrot Legs
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Richter Scale
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Richter Scale that play both.
Coat of Frost
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Coat of Frost that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Well Grounded
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Winter's Wail
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Winter's Wail that play both.
Anothos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Action
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.652.654806964
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played:
2.792.789156627
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.527718550
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.682.683168317
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Ice Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Ice Quake (Red) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.282.282710280
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Emerging Avalanche (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Emerging Avalanche (Blue) that play both.
Cold Snap (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.402.401812689
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Cold Snap (Blue) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Insidious Chill
Avg. played:
2.682.676470588
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Insidious Chill that play both.
Overswing (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Overswing (Red) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played:
2.202.200000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Arctic Incarceration (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Arctic Incarceration (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Bite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Winter's Bite (Red) that play both.
Chill to the Bone (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Chill to the Bone (Blue) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Arctic Incarceration (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.539534884
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Arctic Incarceration (Red) that play both.
Ice Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Ice Quake (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
suspended - Classic Constructed
Amulet of Ice
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Amulet of Ice that play both.
Attack Action
Mangle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played:
2.762.763023493
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Oaken Old that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.542.540520446
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.862.859447005
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.570151921
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.531877729
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
2.802.803478261
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.377899045
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.342.338709677
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.762.762886598
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Snow Under (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.362.364485981
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Snow Under (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Smelting of the Old Ones
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Smelting of the Old Ones that play both.
Icy Encounter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.663847780
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Icy Encounter (Red) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Fault Line
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Fault Line that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Icy Encounter (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.302.303333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Icy Encounter (Blue) that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played:
2.462.463730570
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Endless Winter that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Mulch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Mulch (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.358778626
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Break Ground (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Break Ground (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.506944444
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Entangle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Entangle (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Entangle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Entangle (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.540413534
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.249394673
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.598615917
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.342.338368580
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Biting Gale (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Biting Gale (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Instant
Blizzard
Avg. played:
2.582.581997534
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Blizzard that play both.
Exposed to the Elements
Avg. played:
2.222.223684211
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Exposed to the Elements that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
2.492.487603306
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.