Snow Under (Red)
Elemental Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Ice Fusion (As an additional cost to play Snow Under, you may reveal an Ice card from your hand.)
If Snow Under was fused, it gains "If this hits a hero, create a Frostbite token under their control."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.314.307467439
Average Defense Value: Β
2.662.664483241
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Oldhim
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Oldhim that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity that play both.
Jarl VetreiΔi
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Nullrune Boots
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Civic Steps
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Nullrune Hood
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crater Fist
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Legs
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Tectonic Plating
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Heart of Ice
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Crown of Providence
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tectonic Crust
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Ironrot Legs
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Nullrune Robe
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Civic Duty
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Civic Duty that play both.
Coronet Peak
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Coronet Peak that play both.
Civic Guide
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Civic Guide that play both.
Bastion of Duty
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Coat of Frost
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Coat of Frost that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Rotten Old Buckler
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Rotten Old Buckler that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Titan's Fist
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Winter's Wail
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Winter's Wail that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Anothos
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
98% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
2.932.934131737
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.438596491
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.321976150
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
2.662.657303371
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.202.201320132
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.542.539440204
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Cold Snap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.298039216
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Cold Snap (Blue) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Insidious Chill
Avg. played: Β
2.672.668639053
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Insidious Chill that play both.
Chill to the Bone (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Chill to the Bone (Blue) that play both.
Arctic Incarceration (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Arctic Incarceration (Blue) that play both.
Ice Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Ice Quake (Red) that play both.
suspended - Classic Constructed
Amulet of Ice
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Amulet of Ice that play both.
Winter's Bite (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Winter's Bite (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Emerging Avalanche (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.529411765
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Emerging Avalanche (Blue) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Emerging Avalanche (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Emerging Avalanche (Red) that play both.
Ice Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Ice Quake (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Polar Blast (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Polar Blast (Yellow) that play both.
Arctic Incarceration (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Arctic Incarceration (Red) that play both.
Winter's Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Winter's Bite (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.364245810
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.359173127
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.350954479
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.283018868
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.243713733
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Snow Under (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.232.232057416
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Snow Under (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764044944
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β
2.552.553811659
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Oaken Old that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.762.759740260
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β
2.462.463730570
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Endless Winter that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Icy Encounter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Icy Encounter (Blue) that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.697318008
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.622.617241379
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Mulch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Mulch (Blue) that play both.
Break Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Break Ground (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.263681592
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.447698745
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Icy Encounter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.378640777
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Icy Encounter (Red) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Entangle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Entangle (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Entangle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Entangle (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.132.133333333
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Yellow) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Break Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Break Ground (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Mulch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Mulch (Red) that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Winter's Grasp (Red) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.367924528
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.162.164222874
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.394789579
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.521739130
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.802.797546012
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Instant
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β
2.432.433014354
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Blizzard that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.701.699481865
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Exposed to the Elements
Avg. played: Β
1.811.814814815
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Exposed to the Elements that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Snow Under (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.