Tectonic Plating
Guardian Equipment - Chest
Once per Turn Action - [1 Resource]: Create a Seismic Surge aura token. Go again
Battleworn (If you defend with Tectonic Plating, put a -1 [Defense] counter on it when the combat chain closes.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.475.470705312
Average Defense Value: Β
2.852.852169591
Hero
Bravo, Showstopper
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bravo that play both.
Valda, Seismic Impact
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Betsy
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Betsy that play both.
Terra
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Terra that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crown of Providence that play both.
Crater Fist
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Hood
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Aurum Aegis
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Balance of Justice
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Balance of Justice that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Arcane Lantern
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironrot Legs
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Craterhoof
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Craterhoof that play both.
Testament of Valahai
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Testament of Valahai that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Crown of Dominion
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Golden Glare
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Golden Glare that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Base of the Mountain
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Redwood Hammer
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.692.687632415
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tear Asunder that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711481157
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Show Time! that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672472873
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672283067
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Imposing Visage that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.692.694748359
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Promising Terrain that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.724497041
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.252.248288248
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Buckle that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
2.732.731182796
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Surface Shaking that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Flourish that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Midas Touch that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Leave a Dent that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Double Down that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.695669980
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.712.710033369
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Cranial Crush that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.712.707565211
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.701733695
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.717399984
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.721544971
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723223424
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729486627
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.734155533
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742721465
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.732.725863647
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.806548213
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714407971
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.762.761532508
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crippling Crush that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745839452
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and The Golden Son that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
2.792.791666667
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Headbutt that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746526932
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Star Struck that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790058170
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712277206
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.704061549
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.671.667515113
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pulverize that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.772.766687858
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bet Big that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.675363473
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.732368897
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.630558249
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700048379
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Primed to Fight that play both.
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711340206
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.552.545474761
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Boulder Drop that play both.
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pec Perfect that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.550408719
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.589399745
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.558549223
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.537740063
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Disable (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.510044907
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Mangle that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thump (Red) that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.597532768
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.559602649
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733764910
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750730282
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689629312
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.604574817
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Solid Ground
Avg. played: Β
2.652.647058824
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Solid Ground that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.560482441
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.516268573
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742811018
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.732.730284480
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Trounce that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β
2.742.743801653
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Seismic Eruption that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.556170157
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.361879993
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.648113208
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.644083969
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Remembrance that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.