Tectonic Plating
Guardian Equipment - Chest
Once per Turn Action - [1 Resource]: Create a Seismic Surge aura token. Go again
Battleworn (If you defend with Tectonic Plating, put a -1 [Defense] counter on it when the combat chain closes.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
5.635.627104446
Average Defense Value:
2.862.860832806
Hero
Bravo, Showstopper
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bravo that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Victor Goldmane
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Betsy
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Betsy that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Crown of Providence
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crown of Providence that play both.
Crater Fist
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Aurum Aegis
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Balance of Justice
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Balance of Justice that play both.
Ironrot Legs
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Golden Glare
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Golden Glare that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Stand Ground
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Stand Ground that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ironhide Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Bastion of Duty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Anothos that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Titan's Fist
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.712.710218306
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tear Asunder that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played:
2.722.724270776
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Show Time! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played:
2.662.656609195
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Imposing Visage that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.741159830
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played:
2.172.165453970
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Buckle that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Double Down that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.612.613537118
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.735606680
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
2.752.748042160
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.755151515
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.732.734846205
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
2.752.747852390
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.760376878
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.762060671
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.812.810259895
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.768096886
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played:
2.762.761266354
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.837428758
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.792.788372507
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Command and Conquer that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played:
2.822.821105288
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and The Golden Son that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.776060284
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played:
2.772.773318872
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crippling Crush that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.784346378
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played:
2.762.763429752
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Star Struck that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played:
2.752.749317872
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Primed to Fight that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.738781467
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played:
1.661.658768267
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pulverize that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.786187323
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played:
2.772.772469253
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bet Big that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.712.713662502
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.698688014
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.726297968
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played:
2.522.515404930
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Boulder Drop that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.562785790
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.584084673
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Disable (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.535421687
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.769699850
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.613145297
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.722.720904836
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.579874214
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.520370891
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.376681614
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.812.807707829
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played:
2.812.805477528
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Trounce that play both.
Test of Vigor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Test of Vigor that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.579970105
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Remembrance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.377988615
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.