Tectonic Plating
Guardian Equipment - Chest
Once per Turn Action - [1 Resource]: Create a Seismic Surge aura token. Go again
Battleworn (If you defend with Tectonic Plating, put a -1 [Defense] counter on it when the combat chain closes.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.485.480618631
Average Defense Value: Β
2.852.852414784
Hero
Bravo, Showstopper
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bravo that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Betsy
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Betsy that play both.
Terra
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Terra that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crown of Providence that play both.
Crater Fist
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Hood
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Aurum Aegis
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Balance of Justice
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Balance of Justice that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Arcane Lantern
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironrot Legs
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Craterhoof
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Craterhoof that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Crown of Dominion
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Base of the Mountain
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Golden Glare
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Golden Glare that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Redwood Hammer
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.692.686337339
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tear Asunder that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711269464
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Show Time! that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.672.670025914
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.672.670856171
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Imposing Visage that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Promising Terrain that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.692.693922652
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
2.752.754098361
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746753247
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Surface Shaking that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723327739
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.252.245536723
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Buckle that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Leave a Dent that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Flourish that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.072.065789474
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Midas Touch that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Double Down that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Daily Grind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Daily Grind that play both.
Overswing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Overswing (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.695060711
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.712.709444762
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Cranial Crush that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.712.707281404
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.701147152
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.716854654
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.721223854
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723314858
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729167667
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733298898
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742109446
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.732.725635289
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807071381
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
2.812.813953488
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Headbutt that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714426028
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.762.761209107
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crippling Crush that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.742.744902972
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and The Golden Son that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746387460
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Star Struck that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.792.786492375
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711071508
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.703231598
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.671.667544700
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pulverize that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764907765
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bet Big that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.674134827
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.731197455
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.630715775
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
2.702.699854298
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Primed to Fight that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.542.543619646
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Boulder Drop that play both.
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pec Perfect that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.542325581
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.589523401
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.557479224
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.537443946
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Disable (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.509483167
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Mangle that play both.
Fault Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fault Line that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
2.512.512820513
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Hostile Encroachment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Hostile Encroachment that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thump (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.597515868
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.558414044
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733514790
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.752.752284264
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689394757
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.604564756
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.561506874
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.514778325
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742115404
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729485480
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Trounce that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555511341
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.358242584
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.647502356
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.643469971
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Remembrance that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.