Tectonic Plating
Guardian Equipment - Chest
Once per Turn Action - [1 Resource]: Create a Seismic Surge aura token. Go again
Battleworn (If you defend with Tectonic Plating, put a -1 [Defense] counter on it when the combat chain closes.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.485.476166826
Average Defense Value: Β
2.852.852241326
Hero
Bravo, Showstopper
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bravo that play both.
Valda, Seismic Impact
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Betsy
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Betsy that play both.
Terra
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Terra that play both.
New
Pleiades, Superstar
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pleiades, Superstar that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crown of Providence that play both.
Crater Fist
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Hood
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Aurum Aegis
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Balance of Justice
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Balance of Justice that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Arcane Lantern
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironrot Legs
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Craterhoof
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Craterhoof that play both.
Testament of Valahai
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Testament of Valahai that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Crown of Dominion
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Golden Glare
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Golden Glare that play both.
Base of the Mountain
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Redwood Hammer
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.692.687025948
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tear Asunder that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711335677
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Show Time! that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.672.670878805
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.672.671592620
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Imposing Visage that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.692.693922652
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Promising Terrain that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.724630777
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
2.742.740740741
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Surface Shaking that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.252.247183416
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Buckle that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Flourish that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Leave a Dent that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.092.094936709
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Midas Touch that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Double Down that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.695375874
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.712.709984393
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Cranial Crush that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.712.707434145
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.701610357
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.717250220
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.721536005
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723466929
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729291573
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733636832
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742418230
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.732.725647490
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.806971939
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714609773
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
2.822.819354839
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Headbutt that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.762.761350407
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crippling Crush that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745184640
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and The Golden Son that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746241291
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Star Struck that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.792.789501875
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711681672
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.703657225
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.671.667357513
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pulverize that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.772.766197783
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bet Big that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.674985027
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.731607629
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.630643145
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700339147
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Primed to Fight that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.542.544417096
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Boulder Drop that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pec Perfect that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547291093
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.589985020
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.558131488
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.537530809
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Disable (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.509715640
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Mangle that play both.
Grind Them Down (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Grind Them Down (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thump (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.597623167
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.558996827
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733842057
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.752.752763819
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689503119
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.604582096
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Solid Ground
Avg. played: Β
2.702.696969697
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Solid Ground that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.561453509
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.515769594
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742232568
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729788258
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Trounce that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β
2.792.792079208
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Seismic Eruption that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.556275625
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.360493366
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.647502356
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.643469971
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Remembrance that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.
