Tectonic Plating
Guardian Equipment - Chest
Once per Turn Action - [1 Resource]: Create a Seismic Surge aura token. Go again
Battleworn (If you defend with Tectonic Plating, put a -1 [Defense] counter on it when the combat chain closes.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.575.568273675
Average Defense Value: Β
2.862.856013850
Hero
Bravo, Showstopper
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Victor Goldmane
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bravo that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Betsy
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Betsy that play both.
Terra
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Terra that play both.
Jarl VetreiΔi
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Civic Steps
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crown of Providence that play both.
Crater Fist
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crater Fist that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Nullrune Hood
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Aurum Aegis
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Balance of Justice
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Balance of Justice that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Ironrot Legs
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Arcane Lantern
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Golden Glare
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Golden Glare that play both.
Well Grounded
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Well Grounded that play both.
Time Skippers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Time Skippers that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Anothos
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Titan's Fist that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Redwood Hammer
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.682.678198400
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Tear Asunder that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711935731
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Show Time! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.662.655482195
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Imposing Visage that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.512.509702458
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Flourish that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.725512528
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.202.203284902
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Buckle that play both.
Thrive
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thrive that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Seeds of Strength that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.442.440438871
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and The Weakest Link that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Double Down that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.682679613
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.702.697613883
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Cranial Crush that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.692.694327592
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Spinal Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.706350642
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.688921727
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712199962
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714564565
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.724351181
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711444805
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.722.724251440
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727669999
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Command and Conquer that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.805570035
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.704653568
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.762.762799357
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crippling Crush that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.702.703862661
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and The Golden Son that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.762.758389262
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
2.752.748864106
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Star Struck that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.694736842
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.661.664248705
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pulverize that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.682.680689103
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.762.757127488
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bet Big that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.638395002
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
2.702.695390257
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Primed to Fight that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.627077667
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.686668554
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689873418
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506464306
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Boulder Drop that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Plow Under that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.516753537
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Disable (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.501615710
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.536574487
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.517894737
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.578072017
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.550296834
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.728147268
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.692.686298222
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.602735119
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.560990099
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.505524862
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.381808128
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.762.761904762
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.712.708403160
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.692.691765369
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Trounce that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.554274466
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.527514231
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.519230769
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.343539631
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.455337691
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tectonic Plating and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.