Spinal Crush
Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Crush - If Spinal Crush deals 4 or more damage to a hero, action cards, activated abilities, and attacks they control lose and can't gain go again during their next action phase.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.465.457871519
Average Defense Value: Β
2.852.849221041
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Victor Goldmane that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Bravo
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Bravo that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Terra
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Terra that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Boots
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Civic Steps
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Civic Steps that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Tectonic Plating
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crater Fist
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Crater Fist that play both.
Aurum Aegis
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Nullrune Hood
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Balance of Justice that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Arcane Lantern
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Ironrot Legs
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Crown of Dominion
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Ironhide Legs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Time Skippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Time Skippers that play both.
Heart of Ice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Heart of Ice that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Well Grounded
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Well Grounded that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Redwood Hammer
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Redwood Hammer that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Winter's Wail
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Winter's Wail that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.712.709510300
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Tear Asunder that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800436999
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711447624
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Imposing Visage that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712902482
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Show Time! that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.672.670722433
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.242.239489844
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Buckle that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Surface Shaking that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.062.058577406
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Midas Touch that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and The Weakest Link that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.751856483
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.762.757291480
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.751842028
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.759025465
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.758561845
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.832.827277497
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Command and Conquer that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.761035008
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811335578
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.762841452
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.752.751952908
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746323110
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.830692023
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.822.824826158
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and The Golden Son that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.802.801252787
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790370739
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Crippling Crush that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
2.792.792127921
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Star Struck that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.755823187
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.671.667668838
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Pulverize that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.739258387
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.671393950
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Oaken Old that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Primed to Fight that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Plow Under that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Bet Big that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.631154551
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.552.550583978
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Boulder Drop that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Mangle that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.528506424
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Disable (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.531511433
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
2.542.541094669
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Endless Winter that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Glacial Footsteps (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.789752177
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.802.804119378
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729388298
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.580620452
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.569001490
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.537296205
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.822.820240901
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.812.809791867
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Trounce that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.380192077
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.586593457
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
1.661.661436331
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Remembrance that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511066398
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Blizzard that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Spinal Crush and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.