Staunch Response (Red)
Guardian Defense Reaction
As an additional cost to play Staunch Response, you may pay [4 Resource]. If you do, Staunch Response gains +3 [Defense].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
5.565.555718480
Average Defense Value:
2.852.847510883
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Terra
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Terra that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crater Fist
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Crown of Providence
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tectonic Plating
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Aurum Aegis
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Balance of Justice
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Arcane Lantern
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Nullrune Hood
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Ironhide Legs
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Ironrot Legs
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Time Skippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Heart of Ice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Crown of Dominion
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Winter's Wail
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Winter's Wail that play both.
Redwood Hammer
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.812.807405503
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played:
2.762.762752076
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played:
2.722.716712329
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Buckle that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Truce that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Imperial Warhorn
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Imperial Warhorn that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Stamp Authority
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Stamp Authority that play both.
Nerves of Steel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Nerves of Steel that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.902.902333710
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
2.912.907455547
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.912.909667706
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
2.912.910447761
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.912.905198447
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.882.883588730
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.902.897921840
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.922.922654964
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.892.886956522
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played:
2.842.836879433
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.892.890444811
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.838535890
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.876992718
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.872.866231648
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played:
1.721.724604966
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Endless Winter that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.677666188
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Oaken Old that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played:
2.632.626006904
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Ripple Away that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.695768613
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.501639344
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.865100191
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.772.773342837
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.652.649383408
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.715133531
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Staunch Response (Yellow) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Test of Vigor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Test of Vigor that play both.
Instant
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.812949640
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.812.808153477
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.784574468
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.744751749
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.540897909
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.371.366495507
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Blizzard that play both.
Exposed to the Elements
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Exposed to the Elements that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Staunch Response (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.