Glacial Footsteps (Red)
Elemental Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Ice Fusion (As an additional cost to play Glacial Footsteps, you may reveal an Ice card from your hand.)
If Glacial Footsteps was fused, it gains dominate. (The defending hero can't defend Glacial Footsteps with more than 1 card from their hand.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.185.180850706
Average Defense Value: Β
2.772.769225812
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Oldhim
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Oldhim that play both.
Jarl VetreiΔi
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Nullrune Boots
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crater Fist
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Civic Steps
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Ironhide Legs
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Arcane Lantern
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Ironrot Legs
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Civic Duty
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Civic Duty that play both.
Crown of Providence
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Heart of Ice
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Civic Guide
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Civic Guide that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Bastion of Duty
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Tectonic Plating
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Mage Master Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Well Grounded
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Tectonic Crust
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Civic Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Civic Peak that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Titan's Fist
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Winter's Wail
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Winter's Wail that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
99% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
2.942.938202247
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
2.882.879668050
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.677591735
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.652.648012350
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.344112769
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Imperial Warhorn
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Imperial Warhorn that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.971.966133584
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Cold Snap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Cold Snap (Blue) that play both.
Insidious Chill
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Insidious Chill that play both.
suspended - Blitzsuspended - Classic Constructed
Hypothermia
Avg. played: Β
2.502.502103787
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Hypothermia that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β
2.412.414125201
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Attack Action
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.735035914
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.912.910807975
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.748058671
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.744687131
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.751012777
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.882.878408254
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.876230129
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.882.884080371
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.912.908141054
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β
2.772.771074710
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Endless Winter that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811881188
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.743243243
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.672.668411037
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.693659761
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.641558442
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β
2.362.363947519
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Oaken Old that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.511.507442490
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Frost Fang (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.715909091
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Frost Fang (Red) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.545454545
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Snow Under (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Snow Under (Red) that play both.
Mulch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.370078740
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Mulch (Blue) that play both.
Break Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Break Ground (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.512096774
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.552173913
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.476327116
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Snow Under (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Snow Under (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Icy Encounter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Icy Encounter (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727897532
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.771.773316062
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.471.472505092
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.791023843
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.508847185
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.405077263
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.012.008064516
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.662.664285714
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β
1.921.924161400
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Blizzard that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.289443814
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Exposed to the Elements
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Exposed to the Elements that play both.
Peace of Mind (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.488372093
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Peace of Mind (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glacial Footsteps (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.