banner
Desires of Flesh (Red)
2849 decks (0.5047%)
Price History
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, banish the top card of their deck. Whenever this banishes an attack action card, gain 1{g}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.462.460536034
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.892.887189526
Hero
New
Arakni, Web of Deceit
Arakni, Web of Deceit
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Arakni, Web of Deceit that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Nuu that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
New
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
New
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Equipment
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
New
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
New
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Aqua Seeing Shell
Aqua Seeing Shell
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Aqua Seeing Shell that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Heirloom of Snake Hide
Heirloom of Snake Hide
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Heirloom of Snake Hide that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Koi Blessed Kimono
Koi Blessed Kimono
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Koi Blessed Kimono that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
New
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
New
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Action
New
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.550825369
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
New
Public Bounty (Red)
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642384106
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.162.155201342
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.479647965
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555023923
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.354299363
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.305410122
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.429289304
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.520380435
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.534139403
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.172.166479190
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.246023330
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.253571429
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
New
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.498761354
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.273936170
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.254470426
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506224066
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.383561644
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.467796610
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.516421291
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.373793103
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.418918919
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mind's Desire (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.692939245
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.458333333
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
New
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.431034483
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Blue)
Impulsive Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Impulsive Desire (Blue) that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444444444
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Red)
Reaper's Call (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.382978723
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Reaper's Call (Red) that play both.
New
Mark the Prey (Blue)
Mark the Prey (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mark the Prey (Blue) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Yellow)
Reaper's Call (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Reaper's Call (Yellow) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.540697674
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Yellow)
Mark of the Black Widow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Yellow) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
New
Bite (Red)
Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Bite (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.240397351
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.869918699
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506900878
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.456475584
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.474074074
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444162437
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
New
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.253456221
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
New
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.382978723
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
New
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.341463415
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.391143911
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Venomous Bite (Blue) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Red)
Intimate Inducement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.336032389
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Intimate Inducement (Red) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.588594705
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Siren's Call that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.446985447
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Hiss (Yellow)
Hiss (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.363414634
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Hiss (Yellow) that play both.
New
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Spike with Frailty
Spike with Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Spike with Frailty that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spike with Inertia
Spike with Inertia
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Spike with Inertia that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.429311621
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.414285714
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Lair of the Spider that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.406885759
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Den of the Spider that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Desires of Flesh (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.