banner
Isolate (Red)
13629 decks (2.414%)
Price History
Isolate (Red)
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth Dominate (The defending hero can't defend with or play more than 1 defending card or defense reaction from their hand this chain link.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.243.240570174
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.722.717087954
Hero
Uzuri
Uzuri
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
New
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Nuu that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
New
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Equipment
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
New
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
New
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
New
Starting Point
Starting Point
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
New
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
New
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Action
New
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836501901
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.704210664
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.734375000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.716417910
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.679389313
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619588745
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.668449198
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.388416578
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.692285467
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.781295124
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.683374445
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.669692811
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735584843
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.775737622
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.676616355
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636363636
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.737827715
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.717161017
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.466290269
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.616090332
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.752172460
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
New
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.790419162
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.461427194
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.583901271
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.716509434
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.691823899
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.288383428
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.640000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.374353926
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.375872383
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.443331816
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.536585366
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437823834
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.408333333
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.647553287
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.396284830
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
New
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.603603604
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.497933884
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.607539683
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.463237957
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.605341246
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
New
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.357040573
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.102.100951832
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506276151
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.469671441
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.542168675
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.489841986
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
New
Bite (Red)
Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Bite (Red) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Malign (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444751381
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.466329114
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Red)
Reaper's Call (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Reaper's Call (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560458453
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Censor that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Amnesia
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Prowl (Yellow)
Prowl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Prowl (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.782287823
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.630910202
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
New
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.794979079
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
New
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.786458333
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.557462687
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.499930642
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.299880287
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.310063644
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
1.931.932292612
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.550624731
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.352204682
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.152.148523985
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
New
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.520833333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Spike with Frailty
Spike with Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Spike with Frailty that play both.
Spike with Inertia
Spike with Inertia
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Spike with Inertia that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.502994012
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
New
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.695676713
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.669867486
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780821918
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.494845361
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
New
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.162.164383562
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Lair of the Spider that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.420289855
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Den of the Spider that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.396561605
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.440663547
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Isolate (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.