banner
Sedate (Red)
5258 decks (0.9199%)
Price History
Sedate (Red)
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, create an Inertia token under their control.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.063.064364128
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.732.728852300
Hero
New
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Uzuri
Uzuri
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
New
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nuu that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
New
Arakni, Web of Deceit
Arakni, Web of Deceit
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Web of Deceit that play both.
Equipment
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
New
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
New
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Bloodied Oval
Bloodied Oval
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
New
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
New
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Action
New
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.851851852
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.542224273
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.434924787
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Toxicity (Red)
Toxicity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Toxicity (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.355324781
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.268342590
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.403495994
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.243265306
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.527364758
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.778091208
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.661764706
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.580144404
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.273476867
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.601926782
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.212454212
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.336032389
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.734745335
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.438211725
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.622327791
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.381443299
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.561734213
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.425925926
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.568627451
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.606447689
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
New
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.424107143
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.278922345
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.280487805
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Malign (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620567376
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.393939394
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Yellow)
Prowl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Yellow) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.413793103
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.314049587
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.446808511
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
New
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444444444
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
New
Bite (Red)
Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bite (Red) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.399098083
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.520000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Red)
Reaper's Call (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.409090909
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Reaper's Call (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.488970588
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Blue) that play both.
New
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.443917852
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Yellow)
Sedate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sedate (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.249467600
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.224862259
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.375692964
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.231121281
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.504676698
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
New
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.317073171
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
New
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.323883770
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.012.010349288
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.458614347
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.394088670
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Spike with Frailty
Spike with Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.749045802
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Frailty that play both.
Spike with Inertia
Spike with Inertia
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.263157895
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Inertia that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
New
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Yellow) that play both.
New
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Short and Sharp (Red)
Short and Sharp (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Short and Sharp (Red) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.531825153
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.586813187
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.345315904
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
New
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.363636364
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.