Sedate (Red)
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth
When this hits a hero, create an Inertia token under their control.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.053.046156945
Average Defense Value:
2.732.730752007
Hero
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Uzuri
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Web of Deceit
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Web of Deceit that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Equipment
Flick Knives
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Nullrune Hood
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Old Knocker
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Redback Shroud
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Danger Digits
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Toxic Tips
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Deceit
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mask of Perdition
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Blossom of Spring
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Arousing Wave
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Shriek Razors
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Starting Point
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Bloodied Oval
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Graven Call
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Action
Kiss of Death
Avg. played:
2.842.842465753
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Riddle with Regret
Avg. played:
2.562.555555556
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Riddle with Regret that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.788135593
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.562.556645852
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.434244792
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Toxicity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Toxicity (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.364724348
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.275568182
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.406183115
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.250989707
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.542.535559678
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.782.778345725
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.580965909
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.616279070
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.284948638
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.742.739665354
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
2.352.352401747
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.437292359
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
2.632.626528692
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.262987013
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.562.561542034
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
2.492.493506494
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
2.532.528023599
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.612.608328304
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
2.762.761904762
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.525000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.292.285496183
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
2.542.538194444
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Malign (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.331606218
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Yellow) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.405063291
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
2.632.631034483
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.465116279
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.342.343750000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.352.354838710
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.401111111
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
2.502.502857143
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.397260274
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Bite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bite (Red) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.487394958
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Mark the Prey (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark the Prey (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
2.452.450310559
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Reaper's Call (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Reaper's Call (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sedate (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.265874166
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.242.243377483
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played:
2.802.801526718
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.382.378321383
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.232.233277122
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.512.510891089
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.332.325123153
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played:
2.292.294117647
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.022.021464646
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.462372065
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Spike with Frailty
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Frailty that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
2.462.456692913
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Spike with Inertia
Avg. played:
2.282.284804368
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Inertia that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Yellow) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Incision (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Short and Sharp (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Short and Sharp (Red) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.536032689
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.582.584715213
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.352.351636748
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.