banner
Sedate (Red)
5520 decks (0.7838%)
Price History
Sedate (Red)
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, create an Inertia token under their control.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.043.042100924
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.732.731152308
Hero
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Uzuri
Uzuri
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Web of Deceit
Arakni, Web of Deceit
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Web of Deceit that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nuu that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Equipment
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Starting Point
Starting Point
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Bloodied Oval
Bloodied Oval
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Action
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835365854
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Riddle with Regret
Riddle with Regret
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Riddle with Regret that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.815384615
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.559096946
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.432661028
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Toxicity (Red)
Toxicity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Toxicity (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Cutting Retort
Cutting Retort
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Cutting Retort that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.366095757
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.276805869
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.405117271
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.252259332
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.537350138
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777468707
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.579263977
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.722222222
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626315789
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.285904847
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.599398722
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.739960823
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.354880694
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.436619718
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626054358
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.266666667
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560240964
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.502427184
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.541899441
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.608800482
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.763440860
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.526315789
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.283232628
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Malign (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.528169014
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.352657005
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Yellow)
Prowl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Yellow) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.415730337
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.631034483
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.473118280
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.328358209
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.523560209
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.384615385
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.405063291
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Bite (Red)
Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bite (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.487455197
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Red)
Reaper's Call (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Reaper's Call (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.450464396
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Mark the Prey (Blue)
Mark the Prey (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark the Prey (Blue) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Yellow)
Sedate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sedate (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.267585415
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.247378768
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.801369863
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.379150904
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.232922732
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.511811024
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.327742837
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.032.025689223
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.462829736
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.311827957
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Spike with Frailty
Spike with Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Frailty that play both.
Spike with Inertia
Spike with Inertia
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.286744815
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Inertia that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.462121212
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Yellow) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Short and Sharp (Red)
Short and Sharp (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Short and Sharp (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.537495382
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.584648494
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.353926702
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.