banner
Sedate (Red)
5488 decks (0.7933%)
Price History
Sedate (Red)
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, create an Inertia token under their control.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.053.045436096
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.732.730965280
Hero
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Uzuri
Uzuri
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Web of Deceit
Arakni, Web of Deceit
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Web of Deceit that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nuu that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Equipment
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Starting Point
Starting Point
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Bloodied Oval
Bloodied Oval
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Action
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.840000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.796610169
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.556595365
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Riddle with Regret
Riddle with Regret
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Riddle with Regret that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.433962264
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Toxicity (Red)
Toxicity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Toxicity (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.364312268
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.275354108
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.405315615
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733333333
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250789889
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.535659154
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.778087279
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.579432624
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619318182
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.285459411
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.599698455
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.739921337
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.353504571
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437110834
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626585251
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.262135922
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560817084
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.492385787
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.530612245
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.608328304
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.767441860
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.532786885
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.284194529
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.533101045
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Malign (Red)
Malign (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.335025381
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Yellow)
Prowl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Prowl (Yellow) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.631034483
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428571429
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.471910112
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.370967742
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400662252
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.406666667
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Bite (Red)
Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bite (Red) that play both.
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Impulsive Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Impulsive Desire (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.486227545
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Mark the Prey (Blue)
Mark the Prey (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark the Prey (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.449612403
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Reaper's Call (Red)
Reaper's Call (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Reaper's Call (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Yellow)
Sedate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sedate (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.265819127
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.243733509
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.798507463
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.378526316
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.233576642
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510680380
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.325842697
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.022.022040302
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.463063063
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.305882353
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Spike with Frailty
Spike with Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Frailty that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454901961
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Spike with Inertia
Spike with Inertia
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.284287012
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Spike with Inertia that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Razor's Edge (Yellow) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Short and Sharp (Red)
Short and Sharp (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Short and Sharp (Red) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.536005939
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.584715213
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.352260778
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.