Levels of Enlightenment
Mystic Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks, choose 1 for each blue card you've pitched this turn;
Draw a card.
This gets +2{p}.
This gets go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.532.534280785
Average Defense Value: Β
2.702.702124015
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Zen
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Zen that play both.
Enigma
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Enigma that play both.
Equipment
Traverse the Universe
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Calming Gesture
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Calming Gesture that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Arousing Wave that play both.
Tide Flippers
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Tide Flippers that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Meridian Pathway
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Crown of Reflection
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Silent Stilettos
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Pouncing Paws
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Nullrune Hood that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Flick Knives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Flick Knives that play both.
Old Knocker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Old Knocker that play both.
Nullrune Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mask of Momentum
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Wave of Reality
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Wave of Reality that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Spider's Bite
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Scale Peeler that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Zephyr Needle
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.812.806612134
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Rage Specter that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β
2.822.823574338
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.632.633662558
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and The Weakest Link that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Astral Etchings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Astral Etchings (Red) that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.632.633600675
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Truce that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Midas Touch that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and This Round's on Me that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Haze Bending that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.619857378
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
10,000 Year Reunion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and 10,000 Year Reunion that play both.
Dissolve Reality
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Dissolve Reality that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Essence of Ancestry: Mind that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.882.884196612
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.842.844809866
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790516350
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Chase the Tail that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.802.795923281
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.822.816270567
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β
2.692.687240664
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Phantasmaclasm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Phantasmaclasm that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.691.694119390
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.652.647981615
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Mauling Qi that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Enigma Chimera (Blue) that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Second Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
1.921.923076923
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Ripple Away that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
2.552.545786709
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Erase Face that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Spectral Prowler (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Just a Nick that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β
2.802.795544648
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Siren's Call that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.698442136
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.864615385
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.782.776533997
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.732.734586910
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Hold the Line that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.395967166
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and That All You Got? that play both.
Unravel Aggression
Avg. played: Β
2.062.059233449
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Unravel Aggression that play both.
Put in Context
Avg. played: Β
2.492.489559165
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Put in Context that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Stir the Pot that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β
2.822.824402891
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764323990
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Art of War that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.291.292682927
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.392910171
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Dense Blue Mist
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Dense Blue Mist that play both.
Snag
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Snag that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Phantom Tidemaw
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Levels of Enlightenment and Phantom Tidemaw that play both.
