In the Swing (Red)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Play In the Swing only if you have attacked 2Β or more times with weapons this turn.
Target weapon attackΒ gains +3[Power].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
0.7220.7221813608
Average Defense Value: Β
2.812.811068921
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Kassai, Cintari Sellsword that play both.
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy that play both.
Kassai
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Dorinthea that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Mentor
Minerva Themis
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Minerva Themis that play both.
Equipment
Valiant Dynamo
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Boots
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Dominion
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Ironsong Versus
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Refraction Bolters
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Gallantry Gold
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Prized Galea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Weapon
Cintari Saber
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Hatchet of Body
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Dawnblade, Resplendent
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Dawnblade, Resplendent that play both.
Action
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.852.847338696
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.842.838718902
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.673172463
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
2.732.734600991
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
2.892.885284346
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.646474878
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.702122803
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played: Β
2.712.710611696
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.581160282
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.534543882
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
2.492.486605702
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Raise an Army that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.562.563442211
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.621001221
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.435916542
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.704560773
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.632135692
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.622.615790542
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Slice and Dice (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Slice and Dice (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.420116699
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Push Forward (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Push Forward (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.532.533469388
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.782.777630708
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
2.042.038370149
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Attack Reaction
Blood Follows Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Blood Follows Blade that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.832.829264157
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.732.731137616
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.741342203
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723823589
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.686110474
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.542.543026706
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played: Β
2.602.599492840
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Run Through that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.172.171314076
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.271245198
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.632.630405098
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.292.293799877
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Rout that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.326521240
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.352.348713647
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.521.517818959
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Beat of the Ironsong
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Beat of the Ironsong that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.728293324
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.782.777163904
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.672.669528341
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
2.522.524740050
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.650127877
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Hold the Line that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Block
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
2.522.522476535
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.277851585
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Authority of Ataya that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both In the Swing (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.