banner
Commanding Performance
10247 decks (1.703%)
Price History
Commanding Performance
Warrior Action
Your next Warrior attack this turn gets +3{p}. Until end of turn, your Warrior attacks get "When this is defended by 1 or more attack action cards, destroy a card in the defending hero's arsenal." Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
0.9340.9338189644
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.762.761132486
Hero
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Olympia that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Prized Galea that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Balance of Justice that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Crown of Dominion that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Dawnblade that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
New
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.861528413
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.858161408
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.849417637
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Spoils of War that play both.
New
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.854077253
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Trot Along that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852195255
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.778648384
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.614224138
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.659179146
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.791415158
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770645269
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800935925
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700590939
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Cash In that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.727860129
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735354363
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
New
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735507246
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.275270520
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Spill Blood
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Spill Blood that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.674458139
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Double Down that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.717557252
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.608028868
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Cleave
Cleave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Cleave that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Raise an Army
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.504050926
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Raise an Army that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and This Round's on Me that play both.
New
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Slice and Dice (Blue)
Slice and Dice (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Slice and Dice (Blue) that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780562347
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Command and Conquer that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.771.772301934
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Runner Runner that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Enlightened Strike that play both.
New
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.866790009
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.822314050
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Provoke that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.848604413
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Flurry that play both.
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.587892899
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Jagged Edge that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735153714
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.865709247
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.660112360
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.841685649
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.211.210026698
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Rout that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834543732
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Up the Ante that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.357247438
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.699964577
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Run Through that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.664130435
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Twinning Blade that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.706958250
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.706688155
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.643981117
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
New
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.317500000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
New
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.528172722
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
New
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
New
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
New
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Searing Gaze that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.401.402787968
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Overpower (Red) that play both.
New
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Endear Devotion that play both.
New
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blistering Blade that play both.
New
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Perforate that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.545384019
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played: Β 
2.001.998389694
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
New
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hunt's End that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852756355
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.802500000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.758219861
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.719309463
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.654276579
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.519566737
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.451487710
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
New
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Pride that play both.
New
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
New
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Heart of Fyendal that play both.