Commanding Performance
Warrior Action
Your next Warrior attack this turn gets +3{p}.
Until end of turn, your Warrior attacks get "When this is defended by 1 or more attack action cards, destroy a card in the defending hero's arsenal."
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
0.9240.9242919906
Average Defense Value: Β
2.772.768926388
Hero
Olympia, Prized Fighter
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Grains of Bloodspill
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Refraction Bolters
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Nullrune Boots
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironsong Versus
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Prized Galea
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Prized Galea that play both.
Golden Gauntlets
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Golden Gauntlets that play both.
Golden Gait
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Golden Gait that play both.
Balance of Justice
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Balance of Justice that play both.
Golden Galea
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Golden Galea that play both.
Golden Heart Plate
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Golden Heart Plate that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crown of Dominion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gallantry Gold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Dawnblade that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hot Streak
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hatchet of Body
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.892.887920299
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.865207069
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
2.842.844663181
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Spoils of War that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.892.885156250
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Trot Along that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
2.872.867283951
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666435986
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790672154
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.622.624835165
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.792.794140324
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.798769231
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700922266
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Cash In that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.712.706391478
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.731865752
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.272.272873563
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Spill Blood that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.682.681518791
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Double Down that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727312775
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.609550562
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Cleave that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
2.512.510508850
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Raise an Army that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.601311475
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Dauntless (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Dauntless (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.792.786889898
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Command and Conquer that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.731.725760184
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Runner Runner that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.882.875991565
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834741784
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Provoke that play both.
Beat of the Ironsong
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Beat of the Ironsong that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.862.859277232
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Flurry that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.542.538237011
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Jagged Edge that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.568904594
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.669158879
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.852.851078476
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.221.223023435
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Rout that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Up the Ante that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.652.651259259
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Twinning Blade that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.362.360117700
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689710099
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played: Β
2.702.699132755
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Run Through that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.312.305870237
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nip at the Heels that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.704468644
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.654757428
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.540252182
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.381.380441640
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Overpower (Red) that play both.
Blood Follows Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blood Follows Blade that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.549420586
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played: Β
2.012.007440476
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.854527213
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780149413
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.732.732014904
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.756546135
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.644712770
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and That All You Got? that play both.
Block
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
2.522.522406015
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.468582375
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Pride that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Authority of Ataya that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Heart of Fyendal that play both.