banner
Commanding Performance
8729 decks (1.777%)
Price History
Commanding Performance
Warrior Action
Your next Warrior attack this turn gets +3{p}. Until end of turn, your Warrior attacks get "When this is defended by 1 or more attack action cards, destroy a card in the defending hero's arsenal." Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
0.9430.9429663132
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.752.748699104
Hero
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Olympia that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Equipment
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Crown of Providence that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Prized Galea that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Balance of Justice that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Dawnblade that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.850220264
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857598300
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857648593
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Spoils of War that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.756373938
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.851401554
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.605561555
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.701273262
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Cash In that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.804536862
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.662790698
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.799598394
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.771541502
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.725375626
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780654617
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Spill Blood
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Spill Blood that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.270993540
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.673862037
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Double Down that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.724835610
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.725649351
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.720876586
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.618597713
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Cleave
Cleave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Cleave that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Raise an Army
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.499381953
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Raise an Army that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and This Round's on Me that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Slice and Dice (Blue)
Slice and Dice (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Slice and Dice (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.774519717
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Command and Conquer that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.831.831508301
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Runner Runner that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867385960
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.847750865
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Flurry that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.752678767
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864074915
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.681310853
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864309459
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.839173090
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.831902718
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Up the Ante that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.221.221211061
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Rout that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.708904110
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Run Through that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.347519653
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.704778919
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.668719754
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Twinning Blade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.383086375
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.701684836
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.524729960
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.421.417862839
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Overpower (Red) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.538894096
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.558648111
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.004916421
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852412646
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770255672
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.715073529
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.664705882
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and That All You Got? that play both.
Hold the Line
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Hold the Line that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.522601110
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.459882583
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Ironsong Pride that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Commanding Performance and Heart of Fyendal that play both.