banner
Hold 'em (Red)
7753 decks (1.373%)
Price History
Hold 'em (Red)
Warrior Action
Your next Warrior attack this turn gets +3{p} and "When this attacks a hero, you may wager a Vigor token with them." (When the chain link resolves, if the attack hit, you create a Vigor token, otherwise they create one.) Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.241.238295952
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.622.622320011
Hero
Olympia
Olympia
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Parry Blade
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Bastion of Unity
Bastion of Unity
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Bastion of Unity that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
Jubeel, Spellbane
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Action
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750851789
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.734939759
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.653241273
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.713910761
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.651094276
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700026337
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.644472362
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826366559
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.635938717
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Spill Blood
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.766971279
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.769102436
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.699288256
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.650090744
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Cleave
Cleave
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.716479017
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.715968586
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.622106481
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.640530760
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
New
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Truce
Truce
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Truce that play both.
New
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.575244880
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.595664467
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.515989628
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.515923567
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.456846951
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.639071397
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.630573248
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.703896104
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Attack Reaction
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.801502630
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.894117647
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.831794872
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.860139860
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.724764151
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.779525032
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780315754
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.809898763
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.720083247
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.579923274
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.748078565
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.654251012
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.664797508
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.645807259
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.409685864
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.162.160516605
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Rout that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
New
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.772434608
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.706636743
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.746701847
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.717012914
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
New
Put in Context
Put in Context
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Put in Context that play both.
Instant
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.432110092
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506616257
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.526881720
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.