Hold 'em (Red)
Warrior Action
Your next Warrior attack this turn gets +3{p} and "When this attacks a hero, you may wager a Vigor token with them." (When the chain link resolves, if the attack hit, you create a Vigor token, otherwise they create one.)
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.231.226281502
Average Defense Value:
2.592.586658740
Hero
Equipment
Prized Galea
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Refraction Bolters
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Boots
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Nullrune Hood
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironsong Versus
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Crown of Providence
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Gallantry Gold
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Parry Blade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Flat Trackers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hot Streak
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Action
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.745803357
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.722.723277075
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.662.656846876
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.732.729534800
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
2.662.662826161
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played:
2.772.772727273
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.495665879
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.778197518
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.642.637845179
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.662.664779162
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.722853535
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played:
2.742.742477257
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played:
2.702.695696721
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.656316916
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.663824604
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.559449312
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.602.601955307
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.589984351
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.572.574324324
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.547572816
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.512.510080645
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.679880329
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.649964209
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.714805825
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Attack Reaction
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.802.803778677
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.842.839124392
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.712454212
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.780998390
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.783435926
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.802.797986155
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.743198407
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.618550725
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.752832861
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.696369637
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.662.662601626
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.355555556
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.679245283
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.142.144052045
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Rout that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.507722008
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.780663781
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.722.715721040
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.755574614
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.712.714009662
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.312.312338223
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.460481100
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Remembrance that play both.