banner
Hold 'em (Red)
8816 decks (1.206%)
Price History
Hold 'em (Red)
Warrior Action
Your next Warrior attack this turn gets +3{p} and "When this attacks a hero, you may wager a Vigor token with them." (When the chain link resolves, if the attack hit, you create a Vigor token, otherwise they create one.) Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.241.244050127
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.632.632492096
Hero
Olympia
Olympia
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
New
Golden Gauntlets
Golden Gauntlets
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Golden Gauntlets that play both.
New
Golden Gait
Golden Gait
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Golden Gait that play both.
New
Golden Galea
Golden Galea
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Golden Galea that play both.
New
Golden Heart Plate
Golden Heart Plate
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Golden Heart Plate that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Parry Blade
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Bastion of Unity
Bastion of Unity
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Bastion of Unity that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
Jubeel, Spellbane
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Merciless Battleaxe
Merciless Battleaxe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Merciless Battleaxe that play both.
Action
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777957337
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743880597
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.659813407
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.712922465
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.658830063
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.661521499
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.639605819
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.699578726
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Spill Blood
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.772300469
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.766009105
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.709090909
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.659143711
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Cleave
Cleave
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.730567686
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.631445905
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.724646226
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.652289670
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.589563863
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.611390285
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.530660377
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Truce
Truce
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Truce that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.538676608
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.473629783
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642940946
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.633250825
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.718374356
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Overcrowded that play both.
Runner Runner
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Attack Reaction
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811114044
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.872122762
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.837112280
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735903219
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.781536697
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777239709
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.814839572
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.723602484
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.763681592
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.586167147
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.754724258
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.648380952
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.668127054
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.652518393
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.431723315
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.192.188963211
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Rout that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.779253410
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.713744904
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.744691358
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.718961039
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.442323651
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.512835473
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Authority of Ataya that play both.