Hold 'em (Red)
Warrior Action
Your next Warrior attack this turn gets +3{p} and "When this attacks a hero, you may wager a Vigor token with them." (When the chain link resolves, if the attack hit, you create a Vigor token, otherwise they create one.)
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.241.241552295
Average Defense Value: Β
2.632.634229095
Hero
Equipment
Golden Gauntlets
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Golden Gauntlets that play both.
Golden Gait
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Golden Gait that play both.
Golden Heart Plate
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Golden Heart Plate that play both.
Prized Galea
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Golden Galea
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Golden Galea that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Refraction Bolters
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Ironsong Versus
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gallantry Gold
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Bastion of Unity
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Bastion of Unity that play both.
Flat Trackers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Vigor Girth
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Beckon Applause
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hot Streak
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Merciless Battleaxe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Merciless Battleaxe that play both.
Action
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.782.779339853
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746571345
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.662531861
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.662.661788618
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714089482
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.665585118
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.642.642396313
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
2.782.775399543
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.702.698604896
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.767921147
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714766127
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.662.661227154
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733752621
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.636720668
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.732.725173210
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.655299056
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.589939024
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.617694805
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.539524175
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.544373285
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Truce that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.472986748
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.644171779
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.636657247
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.719977553
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Overcrowded that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Attack Reaction
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814061293
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.842.839333215
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.872.872604284
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.739668597
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.785051981
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.779490219
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.822.817764667
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723352566
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.590252196
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.762.758389262
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.756042296
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.649621212
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.670594537
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.653481894
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.435266550
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.582.577729573
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Rout that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.782814971
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.722.719557196
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.748424624
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.721286371
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
2.452.448303716
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.517341040
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Red) and Authority of Ataya that play both.