Take it on the Chin
Brute,warrior Instant
The next time you would be dealt damage this turn, prevent 2 of that damage. If you do, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.411.411128107
Average Defense Value: Β
2.762.759958242
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Kayo, Underhanded Cheat that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Boots
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Balance of Justice that play both.
Refraction Bolters
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Ironsong Versus
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Crown of Dominion
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Prized Galea
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Prized Galea that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Skullhorn
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Skullhorn that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gallantry Gold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Savage Sash
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Savage Sash that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hot Streak that play both.
Hatchet of Body
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Cintari Saber
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Dawnblade that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Mandible Claw
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Mandible Claw that play both.
Action
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834244478
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
2.842.844321401
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Spoils of War that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.852.852855760
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Trot Along that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.852.853681905
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Unsheathed that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
2.882.879282594
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.773695481
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.632.632710752
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Booze!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Booze! that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.775604143
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Spill Blood that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.754817371
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
2.702.704844087
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
2.512.508620690
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Raise an Army that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700494030
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.576625387
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.652.651490515
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Cash In that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
2.552.549034749
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.544174489
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555227794
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Commanding Performance that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.472.468064516
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Cleave that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807910208
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Command and Conquer that play both.
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Show of Strength that play both.
Outside Interference
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Outside Interference that play both.
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
Big Bully
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Big Bully that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β
2.032.032210835
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Overcrowded that play both.
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.749268293
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.413680782
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
Flex Strength (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.697752809
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Flex Strength (Blue) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
2.032.028205736
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
Offensive Behavior
Avg. played: Β
1.941.936078007
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Offensive Behavior that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Swing Big that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Bask in Your Own Greatness (Red) that play both.
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Bully Tactics that play both.
Rotten Remains
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Rotten Remains that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Runner Runner that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.862.855819051
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.852.849236328
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blade Flurry that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.880778756
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.876199146
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.632.626587365
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Provoke that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.837667320
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Blood Follows Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blood Follows Blade that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.663927089
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played: Β
2.682.676924864
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Run Through that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.352165389
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.642.637511007
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Jagged Edge that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.539517749
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Beat of the Ironsong
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Beat of the Ironsong that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.292.294172494
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Rout that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666142969
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Up the Ante that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.592.586158192
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.531.532323821
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Twinning Blade that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511450382
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.830902852
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.842.837580829
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.722.720113481
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.682294037
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555071562
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and That All You Got? that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hold the Line that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Block
Steal Victory
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Steal Victory that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.381544842
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Authority of Ataya that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Heart of Fyendal that play both.