Take it on the Chin
Brute,warrior Instant
The next time you would be dealt damage this turn, prevent 2 of that damage. If you do, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.381.375436048
Average Defense Value: Β
2.762.761233092
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
Valiant Dynamo
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Boots
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Balance of Justice that play both.
Ironsong Versus
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Refraction Bolters
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Crown of Dominion
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Prized Galea
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Prized Galea that play both.
Gallantry Gold
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Weapon
Hatchet of Body
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hot Streak
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Dawnblade that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Action
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814349956
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
2.832.827586207
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Spoils of War that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807239618
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Unsheathed that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811352821
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Trot Along that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
2.852.854561481
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.632.631482677
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745047373
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.782329317
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Spill Blood that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.754722922
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played: Β
2.822.819081272
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.590997620
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
2.672.668837675
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
2.522.519493370
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Raise an Army that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.680799352
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.652.651962111
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Cash In that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.527373956
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
2.512.512527751
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.562.560967064
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Commanding Performance that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.452.447934596
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Cleave that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.472.469469027
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Double Down that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.792.788695538
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Command and Conquer that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
2.062.064054904
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Runner Runner that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.842.837859134
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.832.829738628
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blade Flurry that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.867550740
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.867630153
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.802.802476593
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Provoke that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.838068448
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.674272889
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.712.708558559
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Jagged Edge that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.384255107
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played: Β
2.722.716313073
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Run Through that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.537366065
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.302.297173996
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Rout that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.622.615213082
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Up the Ante that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.582.582608696
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.901.896599265
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Perforate that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Twinning Blade that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.465703971
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.531503150
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811271478
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.782.778297474
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.712.706495907
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.683577783
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
2.602.602385181
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and That All You Got? that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
2.592.585374640
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Hold the Line that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.546480144
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Saving Grace that play both.
Instant
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.261.255555556
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.363911073
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take it on the Chin and Heart of Fyendal that play both.