Visit the Golden Anvil
Warrior Action
Olympia Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Olympia.)
As an additional cost to play this, destroy X Gold you control.
Equip X weapons and/or equipment from your inventory.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.541.538501019
Average Defense Value: Β
2.692.690676911
Hero
Olympia, Prized Fighter
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Olympia
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Olympia that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Prized Galea
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Prized Galea that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Boots
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Ironsong Versus
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Refraction Bolters
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gallantry Gold
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Balance of Justice
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Balance of Justice that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Parry Blade
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Parry Blade that play both.
Bastion of Unity
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Bastion of Unity that play both.
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hot Streak
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Cintari Saber that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Action
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790713791
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.830726033
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780880773
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712212212
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.682.676400191
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Double Down that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.808988764
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723667906
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.837209302
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Unsheathed that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
2.802.804195804
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Spill Blood that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.652.653953488
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Commanding Performance that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Spoils of War that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.652.645948946
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Cash In that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Cleave that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Trot Along that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Truce that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Amethyst Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Amethyst Amulet that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780802292
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.710501419
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.767001115
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727883539
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Runner Runner that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Ripple Away that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Attack Reaction
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.802.796258847
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Up the Ante that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.862.864431487
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Provoke that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.842.844520288
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.779812606
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.802.801566580
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Jagged Edge that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Blade Flurry that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712045169
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.789205703
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.614516129
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.657471264
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.720833333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.620155039
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.572.567567568
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Perforate that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Rout that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.817127898
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.762.756707317
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.812.806094183
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.753796095
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.752508361
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
2.562.561822126
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Hold the Line that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Steelblade Shunt (Yellow) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and That All You Got? that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Instant
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
2.592.591492777
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.617896010
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
2.062.062500000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β
2.612.609890110
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Slap-Happy that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit the Golden Anvil and Heart of Fyendal that play both.