banner
Log Fall (Red)
217 decks (0.03436%)
Price History
Log Fall (Red)
Elemental Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Earth Bond - If an Earth card was pitched to play this, this gets overpower. (This can't be defended by more than 1 action card.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.933.925682541
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.622.618539615
Hero
Terra
Terra
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Terra that play both.
Equipment
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Hard Knuckle
Hard Knuckle
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Hard Knuckle that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Rotten Old Buckler
Rotten Old Buckler
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Rotten Old Buckler that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Spell Fray Tiara
Spell Fray Tiara
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Spell Fray Tiara that play both.
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Ironrot Helm
Ironrot Helm
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Bunker Beard
Bunker Beard
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Bunker Beard that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
Tremorshield Sabatons
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
Helm of Lignum Vitae
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Ironhide Legs
Ironhide Legs
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
Plume of Evergrowth
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Bastion of Duty
Bastion of Duty
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
Gauntlet of Might
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Ironhide Helm
Ironhide Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Ironhide Plate
Ironhide Plate
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Weapon
Redwood Hammer
Redwood Hammer
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Action
Seeds of Strength
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Seeds of Strength that play both.
Flourish
Flourish
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Seeds of Strength (Yellow) that play both.
Thrive
Thrive
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Thrive that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Strength of Sequoia (Red)
Strength of Sequoia (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strength of Sequoia (Red) that play both.
Strength of Sequoia (Blue)
Strength of Sequoia (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strength of Sequoia (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Strong Wood (Red)
Strong Wood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strong Wood (Red) that play both.
Burgeoning (Blue)
Burgeoning (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Burgeoning (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Burgeoning (Red)
Burgeoning (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Burgeoning (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Yellow)
Autumn's Touch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Yellow) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Yellow)
Bracken Rap (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Bracken Rap (Yellow) that play both.
Log Fall (Yellow)
Log Fall (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Log Fall (Yellow) that play both.
Strong Wood (Yellow)
Strong Wood (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strong Wood (Yellow) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Break Ground (Blue)
Break Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Break Ground (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Mulch (Red)
Mulch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Mulch (Red) that play both.
Mulch (Blue)
Mulch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Mulch (Blue) that play both.
Entangle (Red)
Entangle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Entangle (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Entangle (Blue)
Entangle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Entangle (Blue) that play both.
Earth Form (Blue)
Earth Form (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Earth Form (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Evergreen (Blue)
Evergreen (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Evergreen (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Yellow)
Cadaverous Tilling (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Yellow) that play both.
Break Ground (Red)
Break Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Break Ground (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Entwine Earth (Red)
Entwine Earth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Entwine Earth (Red) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Red)
Strength of Four Seasons (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strength of Four Seasons (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Thump (Yellow)
Thump (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Thump (Yellow) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Turn Timber (Blue)
Turn Timber (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Turn Timber (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Turn Timber (Red)
Turn Timber (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Turn Timber (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Blue)
Rootbound Carapace (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Blue) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Shelter (Yellow)
Sigil of Shelter (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sigil of Shelter (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Shelter
Sigil of Shelter
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sigil of Shelter that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Fertile Ground (Blue)
Fertile Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fertile Ground (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.