banner
Log Fall (Red)
51 decks (0.01175%)
Price History
Log Fall (Red)
Elemental Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Earth Bond - If an Earth card was pitched to play this, this gets overpower. (This can't be defended by more than 1 action card.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.893.890241978
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.632.634733213
Hero
Terra
Terra
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Terra that play both.
Equipment
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Ironrot Helm
Ironrot Helm
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Hard Knuckle
Hard Knuckle
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Hard Knuckle that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Spell Fray Tiara
Spell Fray Tiara
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Spell Fray Tiara that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Rotten Old Buckler
Rotten Old Buckler
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Rotten Old Buckler that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
New
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ironhide Legs
Ironhide Legs
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
New
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
Stonewall Impasse
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
Ironhide Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Plate
Ironhide Plate
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
New
Helm of Lignum Vitae
Helm of Lignum Vitae
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Weapon
Redwood Hammer
Redwood Hammer
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Action
Flourish
Flourish
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Seeds of Strength
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Seeds of Strength that play both.
Thrive
Thrive
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Thrive that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Seeds of Strength (Yellow) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
New
Strong Yield (Blue)
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
New
Harvest Season (Blue)
Harvest Season (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Harvest Season (Blue) that play both.
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Earthlore Empowerment (Red) that play both.
New
Strong Yield (Yellow)
Strong Yield (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strong Yield (Yellow) that play both.
New
Sigil of Earth
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
New
Strong Yield (Red)
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β 
1.631.625000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Strength of Sequoia (Red)
Strength of Sequoia (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strength of Sequoia (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Burgeoning (Blue)
Burgeoning (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Burgeoning (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Strong Wood (Red)
Strong Wood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strong Wood (Red) that play both.
Burgeoning (Red)
Burgeoning (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Burgeoning (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Yellow)
Autumn's Touch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Yellow) that play both.
Strong Wood (Yellow)
Strong Wood (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strong Wood (Yellow) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Yellow)
Bracken Rap (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Bracken Rap (Yellow) that play both.
Log Fall (Yellow)
Log Fall (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Log Fall (Yellow) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
New
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Break Ground (Blue)
Break Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Break Ground (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
New
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
New
Earth Form (Blue)
Earth Form (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.801.800000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Earth Form (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
New
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Mulch (Red)
Mulch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Mulch (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Mulch (Blue)
Mulch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Mulch (Blue) that play both.
New
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
New
Earth Form (Red)
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Entangle (Blue)
Entangle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Entangle (Blue) that play both.
Entangle (Red)
Entangle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Entangle (Red) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Evergreen (Blue)
Evergreen (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Evergreen (Blue) that play both.
Break Ground (Red)
Break Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Break Ground (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Thump (Yellow)
Thump (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Thump (Yellow) that play both.
New
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Evergreen (Red)
Evergreen (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Evergreen (Red) that play both.
New
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
New
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
New
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
New
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
New
Summer's Fall (Red)
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
New
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Turn Timber (Red)
Turn Timber (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Turn Timber (Red) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Shelter
Sigil of Shelter
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sigil of Shelter that play both.
Sigil of Shelter (Yellow)
Sigil of Shelter (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sigil of Shelter (Yellow) that play both.
New
Seeds of Tomorrow
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
New
Fertile Ground (Blue)
Fertile Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Fertile Ground (Blue) that play both.
New
Sigil of Sanctuary
Sigil of Sanctuary
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Log Fall (Red) and Sigil of Sanctuary that play both.