Turn Timber (Red)
Elemental Guardian Defense Reaction
Earth Fusion (As an additional cost to play Turn Timber, you may reveal an Earth card from your hand.)
If Turn Timber was fused, it gains +2 [Defense].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.264.261208260
Average Defense Value: Β
2.572.571045318
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Bravo, Star of the Show
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Bravo, Star of the Show that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity that play both.
Terra
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Terra that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Oldhim
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Oldhim that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Boots
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Civic Steps
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crater Fist
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ironhide Legs
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Crown of Providence
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tectonic Plating
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Balance of Justice
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Tectonic Crust
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Time Skippers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Nullrune Hood
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Heart of Ice
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Bastion of Duty
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Nullrune Robe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Weapon
Redwood Hammer
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Winter's Wail
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Winter's Wail that play both.
Summit, the Unforgiving
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Titan's Fist
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Anothos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
2.902.900000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
2.862.855585831
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.269230769
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.844444444
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.172.168498168
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Seeds of Strength that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.352.346863469
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Flash (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Flash (Blue) that play both.
Thrive
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Thrive that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β
2.072.072992701
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Seeds of Strength (Yellow) that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Weave Earth (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Weave Earth (Blue) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitzsuspended - Classic Constructed
Hypothermia
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Hypothermia that play both.
Strength of Sequoia (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Strength of Sequoia (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.322525597
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.202.202702703
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
2.232.229629630
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814016173
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Oaken Old that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.792105263
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.622.618534483
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.281967213
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
2.232.228571429
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Evergreen (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.498896247
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Evergreen (Blue) that play both.
Break Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.530660377
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Break Ground (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Heaven's Claws (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Heaven's Claws (Blue) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Lightning Surge (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.322.324528302
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Evergreen (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.770925110
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Evergreen (Red) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Break Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Break Ground (Red) that play both.
Burgeoning (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Burgeoning (Blue) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.653679654
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Icy Encounter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Icy Encounter (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Earth Form (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Earth Form (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Mulch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.312101911
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Mulch (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.590643275
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.462.459459459
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Entangle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Entangle (Red) that play both.
Mulch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Mulch (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.496453901
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.392857143
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Evergreen (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Evergreen (Yellow) that play both.
Shock Striker (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Shock Striker (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.432000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Yellow) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Frost Fang (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Frost Fang (Blue) that play both.
Strong Wood (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Strong Wood (Red) that play both.
Entangle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Entangle (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.511.510869565
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Break Ground (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Break Ground (Yellow) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Endless Winter that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.132.127450980
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.237288136
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.405612245
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608571429
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Turn Timber (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.192.190283401
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Turn Timber (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.222.215686275
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.282.277419355
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Turn Timber (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Turn Timber (Yellow) that play both.
Staunch Response (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Staunch Response (Yellow) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.742.739130435
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Instant
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
1.821.818181818
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.243902439
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Volthaven
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Pulse of Volthaven that play both.
Blink
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Blink that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β
2.302.296774194
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Blizzard that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.319148936
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.326086957
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Exposed to the Elements
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Exposed to the Elements that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Turn Timber (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.