Command Respect (Red)
Guardian Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if this has {p} greater than its base, destroy a card in their arsenal. (This has 6 base {p}.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.664.663178394
Average Defense Value: Β
2.712.712566730
Hero
Betsy
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Terra
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Terra that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Craterhoof
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Civic Steps
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Tectonic Plating
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Gauntlet of Boulderhold
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Gauntlet of Boulderhold that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Arcane Lantern
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Stand Ground
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Crater Fist
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Crown of Providence
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Robe
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Vigor Girth
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Richter Scale
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Richter Scale that play both.
Golden Glare
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Golden Glare that play both.
Aurum Aegis
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Well Grounded
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Bastion of Duty
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Old Knocker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Ironhide Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Redwood Hammer
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
High Riser
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and High Riser that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689895470
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.342.341333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Seeds of Strength that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.405970149
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.340640809
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.315789474
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Draw a Crowd
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Draw a Crowd that play both.
Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.398340249
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Thrive
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thrive that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.398550725
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.456422018
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Seeds of Strength (Yellow) that play both.
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Earthlore Empowerment (Red) that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.385185185
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.346824843
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.496058559
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.367483296
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.762.758220503
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.792.792828685
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712355212
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.747933884
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750260146
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.722.715909091
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.367497692
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.540647198
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.391428571
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Grind Them Down (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Grind Them Down (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.527482270
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.508707608
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.572961373
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.617076326
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.323987539
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.722.719594595
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.304424779
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.408403361
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Mountains (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Clash of Mountains (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Mountains (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Clash of Mountains (Yellow) that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.610465116
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.467256637
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Break Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Break Ground (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Burgeoning (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Burgeoning (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.561881188
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crush Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Strong Wood (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Strong Wood (Red) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Earth Form (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Earth Form (Blue) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thunk (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.403257329
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.382753404
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Lunging Press that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.448924731
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.412.411231884
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.502.495841996
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Crash and Bash (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crash and Bash (Blue) that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Trounce that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Test of Might
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Test of Might that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.