banner
Command Respect (Red)
2545 decks (0.4508%)
Price History
Command Respect (Red)
Guardian Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if this has {p} greater than its base, destroy a card in their arsenal. (This has 6 base {p}.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
4.694.687470036
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.722.716549836
Hero
Betsy
Betsy
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Terra
Terra
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Terra that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo
Bravo
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Victor Goldmane
Victor Goldmane
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Stand Ground
Stand Ground
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
Gauntlet of Might
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Golden Glare
Golden Glare
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Golden Glare that play both.
New
Tremorshield Sabatons
Tremorshield Sabatons
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
New
Bunker Beard
Bunker Beard
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bunker Beard that play both.
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
Stonewall Impasse
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Bastion of Duty
Bastion of Duty
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
Earthlore Bounty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
Anothos
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Redwood Hammer
Redwood Hammer
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
High Riser
High Riser
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and High Riser that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.692673644
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Flourish
Flourish
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.509465021
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Strength
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Seeds of Strength that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.350668648
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.412935323
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.337786260
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.320594480
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Thrive
Thrive
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thrive that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.408988764
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Double Down that play both.
New
Roiling Fissure
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β 
1.601.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Big Bop (Blue)
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.396694215
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.457364341
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Earthlore Empowerment (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Seeds of Strength (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Attack Action
Concuss (Red)
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.382925612
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.345971564
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.497175141
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.377740304
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.749738220
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.709779180
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.747737557
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.737020316
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.773255814
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.707641196
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.537132988
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.364107884
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.397629310
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.525390625
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.502487562
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.574269006
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.607898449
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.708561020
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.325823224
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.309523810
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.395910781
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.592274678
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.464980545
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Plow Under
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Break Ground (Blue)
Break Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Break Ground (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.549333333
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Strong Wood (Red)
Strong Wood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Strong Wood (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Burgeoning (Blue)
Burgeoning (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Burgeoning (Blue) that play both.
The Golden Son
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crush Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Earth Form (Blue)
Earth Form (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Earth Form (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Red)
Thunk (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Thunk (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.404477612
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.384359401
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Lunging Press
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Lunging Press that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.457200403
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.422845691
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.493656286
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Trounce
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Test of Might
Test of Might
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Test of Might that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command Respect (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.