Crush the Weak (Red)
Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Crush - If Crush the Weak deals 4 or more damage to a hero, they can't play attack action cards with 3Β or less base [Power] during their next action phase.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.505.495816003
Average Defense Value: Β
2.852.847008836
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Valda Brightaxe
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
Bravo
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Victor Goldmane
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Victor Goldmane that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Betsy
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Terra
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Terra that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Nullrune Boots
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Crater Fist
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Tectonic Plating
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Aurum Aegis
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Crown of Providence
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Arcane Lantern
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Ironrot Legs
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Crown of Dominion
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Ironhide Legs
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Tectonic Crust
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mage Master Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Golden Glare
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Golden Glare that play both.
Bastion of Duty
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Time Skippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Well Grounded
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Summit, the Unforgiving
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Redwood Hammer
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Winter's Wail
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Winter's Wail that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.742.743272727
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.692.694975545
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.802.799741044
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.682.679933665
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.762.756270447
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.122.124602670
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.590818363
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Seeds of Strength that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Earthlore Empowerment (Red) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.742.738592679
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.640182648
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.742.739401496
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.725355920
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742677049
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608633860
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.620250685
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.802.804749340
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.640917603
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.752.747006369
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.605498854
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.618084612
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.732.728729963
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.737552490
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.842.838190184
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.772.774295914
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807692308
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.635754190
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.491.486005089
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.633928571
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.375146542
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.368545994
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.302137067
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.644478064
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.634108527
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Crush Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.482859227
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.522.524633822
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Endless Winter that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.403490760
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.616784631
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.451417769
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.670129319
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.482.484783769
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.512493355
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.475638051
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.509170306
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672548002
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.742.735677083
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.273337401
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.648148148
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.660377358
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Blizzard that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Crush the Weak (Red) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.