Mulch (Red)
Elemental Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Earth Fusion (As an additional cost to play Mulch, you may reveal an Earth card from your hand.)
If Mulch was fused, it gains "If this hits a hero, put a card from their arsenal on the bottom of their deck."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.404.402102000
Average Defense Value: Β
2.642.641966773
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Oldhim, Grandfather of Eternity that play both.
Terra
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Terra that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Oldhim
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Oldhim that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Nullrune Boots
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Civic Steps
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Tectonic Crust
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Arcane Lantern
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Tectonic Plating
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Nullrune Hood
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Crown of Providence
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Well Grounded
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Crater Fist
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironhide Legs
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Crown of Seeds
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Crown of Seeds that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Bastion of Duty
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Balance of Justice
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Ironrot Legs
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Civic Duty
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Civic Duty that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Heart of Ice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Heart of Ice that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Civic Guide
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Civic Guide that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Coronet Peak
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Coronet Peak that play both.
Weapon
Redwood Hammer
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Summit, the Unforgiving
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Titan's Fist
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Anothos
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Winter's Wail
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Winter's Wail that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
2.932.927536232
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.202.197640118
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.172.174846626
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Seeds of Strength that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428571429
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Thrive
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Thrive that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β
2.442.435406699
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.533333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.421487603
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Seeds of Strength (Yellow) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β
2.442.442477876
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Strength of Sequoia (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Strength of Sequoia (Red) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Strength of Sequoia (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Strength of Sequoia (Blue) that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Earthlore Empowerment (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.281967213
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.271794872
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.241935484
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Mulch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.232.233974359
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Mulch (Blue) that play both.
Break Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.182.184397163
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Break Ground (Blue) that play both.
Entangle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.241992883
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Entangle (Red) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Burgeoning (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Burgeoning (Blue) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Red) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428571429
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.411764706
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Evergreen (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.263157895
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Evergreen (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
2.402.395604396
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.512.508547009
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Entangle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Entangle (Blue) that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Oaken Old that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Yellow) that play both.
Strong Wood (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Strong Wood (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Glacial Footsteps (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.492.488235294
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.442.437908497
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Winter's Grasp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.484848485
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Winter's Grasp (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.343750000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Burgeoning (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Burgeoning (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Snow Under (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Snow Under (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.478991597
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Break Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Break Ground (Red) that play both.
Entwine Earth (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Entwine Earth (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Log Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Log Fall (Red) that play both.
Earth Form (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Earth Form (Blue) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Endless Winter that play both.
Snow Under (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Snow Under (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.552941176
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Evergreen (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Evergreen (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Thump (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Thump (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.292134831
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.252.253125000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.466019417
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Turn Timber (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.302521008
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Turn Timber (Red) that play both.
Turn Timber (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Turn Timber (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.722.720000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mulch (Red) and Blizzard that play both.