Clash of Might (Red)
Brute,guardian Attack Action - Attack
When this defends, clash with the attacking hero. The winner creates a Might token. (Clashing heroes reveal the top card of their deck. The hero that reveals the card with greatest {p} wins.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.385.384430745
Average Defense Value: Β
2.522.520221196
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Terra
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Terra that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Victor Goldmane
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Kayo
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Kayo that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Savage Sash
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Tectonic Crust
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Beaten Trackers
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Civic Steps
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Aurum Aegis
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Tectonic Plating
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Hide Tanner
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Hide Tanner that play both.
Golden Glare
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Golden Glare that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Knucklehead
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Arcane Lantern
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crater Fist
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Summit, the Unforgiving
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Action
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
2.862.860215054
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.772.772043011
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Cast Bones
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712758851
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Cast Bones that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β
2.872.872687704
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.851851852
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
2.862.863450531
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.872.866694352
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
2.862.862886162
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.856781803
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.872822300
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.842419080
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.865148064
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.824967263
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834448907
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.880153404
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.848114711
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.734288355
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.769058296
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.783783784
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Riled Up (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.787663108
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Riled Up (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780226700
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746192893
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Splatter Skull that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.751785714
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.735188510
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727029438
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.772.771946565
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.772.766666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.724137931
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.753146176
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.763211382
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.726738492
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.737538149
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.678418803
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played: Β
2.722.715883669
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β
2.442.435897436
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Clash of Might (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Might (Yellow) that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played: Β
1.561.558823529
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Pulping (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511013216
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pulping (Yellow) that play both.
Savage Beatdown
Avg. played: Β
2.452.448780488
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Savage Beatdown that play both.
Thunk (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Thunk (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Thunk (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Thunk (Yellow) that play both.
Reincarnate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Reincarnate (Blue) that play both.
Smashing Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Smashing Performance that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Skull Crack that play both.
Wallop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Wallop (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β
1.741.744302390
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733395697
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.742.735691988
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Test of Might
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Test of Might that play both.
Test of Vigor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Test of Vigor that play both.
Instant
No Fear
Avg. played: Β
2.302.304938272
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and No Fear that play both.