Clash of Might (Red)
Brute,guardian Attack Action - Attack
When this defends, clash with the attacking hero. The winner creates a Might token. (Clashing heroes reveal the top card of their deck. The hero that reveals the card with greatest {p} wins.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.415.410786071
Average Defense Value: Β
2.522.522693022
Hero
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Kayo
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Kayo that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Equipment
Savage Sash
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Beaten Trackers
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Aurum Aegis
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Civic Steps
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Tectonic Plating
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Dominion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Hide Tanner
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Hide Tanner that play both.
Golden Glare
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Golden Glare that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Knucklehead
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Arcane Lantern
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Crater Fist
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Titan's Fist
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Action
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
2.872.872402770
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.752.749055178
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Cast Bones
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672549930
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Cast Bones that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.852.847926267
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Sea Legs that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β
2.882.877508651
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.892.885232956
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.862214042
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
2.872.873843566
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.864022663
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
2.872.871516574
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.874368874
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.862179487
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834691502
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.833579227
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.865784499
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834260977
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.876627604
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.852745715
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.758827238
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790062112
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780051151
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Riled Up (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.769750739
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Riled Up (Blue) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750103605
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.767938931
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.816022099
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.810262530
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.748659917
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.685996299
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β
2.552.552238806
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pec Perfect that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.715440582
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.694468832
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Clash of Might (Yellow) that play both.
Savage Beatdown
Avg. played: Β
2.412.408506429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Savage Beatdown that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Splatter Skull that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Thunk (Yellow) that play both.
Thunk (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Thunk (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Pulping (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.531468531
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pulping (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Reincarnate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Reincarnate (Blue) that play both.
Smashing Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Smashing Performance that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Skull Crack that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β
1.691.694294526
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Trounce that play both.
Test of Might
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Test of Might that play both.
Instant
No Fear
Avg. played: Β
2.322.315384615
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and No Fear that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Clash of Might (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.