Seeping Shadows (Red)
Shadow Runeblade Action
You may play Seeping Shadows from your banished zone.
The next attack action card with cost 2 or less you play this turn gains +1 [Power] and go again.
Go again
Blood Debt (At the beginning of your end phase, if Seeping Shadows is in your banished zone, lose 1[Life].)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.072.066745011
Average Defense Value:
2.552.554100322
Hero
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Chane that play both.
Vynnset
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Vynnset that play both.
Mentor
Lord Sutcliffe
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Lord Sutcliffe that play both.
Equipment
Face Purgatory
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Ebon Fold
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Crown of Providence
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Aether Ironweave
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Carrion Husk
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Carrion Husk that play both.
Bloodied Oval
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Balance of Justice
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Flail of Agony
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Scepter of Pain
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Nebula Blade that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Galaxxi Black
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Galaxxi Black that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Dread Scythe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Dread Scythe that play both.
Action
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
2.922.916666667
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.862.860465116
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.837837838
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
2.632.625000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.652.645833333
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.800000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.644444444
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.769230769
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.739130435
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.772727273
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.612.611111111
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.472.470588235
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
1.881.882352941
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Yellow) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Blue) that play both.
Chains of Mephetis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Chains of Mephetis that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.636363636
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Seeping Shadows (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.562.562500000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Seeping Shadows (Yellow) that play both.
Dimenxxional Gateway (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Dimenxxional Gateway (Red) that play both.
Jack-o'-lantern (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Jack-o'-lantern (Red) that play both.
Seeping Shadows (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Seeping Shadows (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
1.621.615384615
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of Torment
Avg. played:
2.462.461538462
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Tome of Torment that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Yellow) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Looming Doom that play both.
Emissary of Tides
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Emissary of Tides that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Vile Inquisition (Blue) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Tear Through the Portal (Blue) that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Howl from Beyond (Blue) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Runic Reaping (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
2.862.862745098
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.842.843137255
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.878048780
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.871794872
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.850000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.882.878787879
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
2.612.607843137
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.391304348
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.802.800000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.312500000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.435897436
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Soul Reaping
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Soul Reaping that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.722222222
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Deathly Delight (Blue) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Rift Bind (Blue) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.421052632
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Bounding Demigon (Blue) that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Rifted Torment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Rifted Torment (Red) that play both.
Unhallowed Rites (Red)
Avg. played:
2.042.043478261
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Unhallowed Rites (Red) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Deathly Delight (Yellow) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.529411765
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Piercing Shadow Vise (Red) that play both.
Unhallowed Rites (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Unhallowed Rites (Blue) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Rip Through Reality (Blue) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.615384615
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Rift Skitter (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Rift Skitter (Blue) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Piercing Shadow Vise (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Rift Bind (Yellow) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Bounding Demigon (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Rip Through Reality (Yellow) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Dabble in Darkness
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Dabble in Darkness that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.812500000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Oblivion that play both.
Invert Existence
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Invert Existence that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.552.545454545
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Eclipse
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeping Shadows (Red) and Eclipse that play both.