Lord Sutcliffe
Runeblade Mentor
Mentor (You may only have Sutcliffe in your deck if your hero is young.)
At the start of your turn, if Sutcliffe is face down in your arsenal, you may turn him face up.
Whenever you play a 'non-attack' action card, deal 1 arcane damage to each hero and put a lesson counter on Sutcliffe for each damage dealt this way. Then if there are 3 or more lesson counters on Sutcliffe, banish him, search your deck a specialization card, put it face up into your arsenal, and shuffle your deck.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.082.075313390
Average Defense Value:
2.552.550229161
Hero
Vynnset
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Vynnset that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Chane that play both.
Aurora
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Aurora that play both.
Florian
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Florian that play both.
Briar
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Briar that play both.
Equipment
Vexing Quillhand
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Aether Ironweave
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Ebon Fold
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Ebon Fold that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Crown of Providence
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Bloodied Oval
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Face Purgatory
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Face Purgatory that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Lightning Greaves
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Carrion Husk
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Carrion Husk that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Well Grounded
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Well Grounded that play both.
Balance of Justice
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Balance of Justice that play both.
Grandstand Legplates
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Grandstand Legplates that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Runehold Release
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Runehold Release that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Ticket Puncher
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Ticket Puncher that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Weapon
Flail of Agony
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Flail of Agony that play both.
Scepter of Pain
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Galaxxi Black
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Galaxxi Black that play both.
Star Fall
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Star Fall that play both.
Rotwood Reaper
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rotwood Reaper that play both.
Dread Scythe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Dread Scythe that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Action
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Funeral Moon that play both.
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.172.166666667
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.172.166666667
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Arc Lightning that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
1.801.800000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Warmonger's Recital (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Warmonger's Recital (Red) that play both.
Dimenxxional Gateway (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Dimenxxional Gateway (Red) that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
1.471.468085106
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Recital (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Warmonger's Recital (Yellow) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Spew Shadow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Spew Shadow (Yellow) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Chains of Mephetis
Avg. played:
1.731.733333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Chains of Mephetis that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Dimenxxional Gateway (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Dimenxxional Gateway (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Dimenxxional Gateway (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Dimenxxional Gateway (Yellow) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Looming Doom that play both.
Seeping Shadows (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Seeping Shadows (Yellow) that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Putrid Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Deadwood Dirge (Blue) that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Harness Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Harness Lightning (Red) that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Flourish that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Germinate that play both.
Thistle Bloom - Life
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Thistle Bloom - Life that play both.
Sigil of the Arknight
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sigil of the Arknight that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Sting of Sorcery
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sting of Sorcery that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Putrid Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Vile Inquisition (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Captain's Call (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Captain's Call (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of Torment
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Tome of Torment that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Dimenxxional Crossroads
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Dimenxxional Crossroads that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Vile Inquisition (Red) that play both.
Grim Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Grim Feast (Red) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and This Round's on Me that play both.
Attack Action
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Soul Reaping
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Soul Reaping that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
1.881.882352941
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
1.831.833333333
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Rift Bind (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rift Bind (Blue) that play both.
Rifted Torment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rifted Torment (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Piercing Shadow Vise (Red) that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Snuff Out
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Snuff Out that play both.
Deathly Delight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Deathly Delight (Yellow) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Piercing Shadow Vise (Blue) that play both.
Rifted Torment (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rifted Torment (Blue) that play both.
Unhallowed Rites (Red)
Avg. played:
1.521.521739130
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Unhallowed Rites (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Bounding Demigon (Blue) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
1.411.405405405
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Vexing Malice that play both.
Deathly Delight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Deathly Delight (Blue) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Current Funnel that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Photon Rush (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Photon Rush (Red) that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Vexing Malice that play both.
Lunartide Plunderer (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Lunartide Plunderer (Yellow) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Bounding Demigon (Yellow) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Belittle (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Blossoming Decay (Yellow) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Cadaverous Tilling (Yellow) that play both.
Splintering Deadwood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Splintering Deadwood (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Summer's Fall (Yellow) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Plow Under that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Runerager Swarm (Blue) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Runerager Swarm (Yellow) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Deathly Duet (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rip Through Reality (Blue) that play both.
Rift Bind (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rift Bind (Yellow) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rip Through Reality (Yellow) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
1.331.333333333
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Oblivion that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Invert Existence
Avg. played:
1.621.619047619
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Invert Existence that play both.
Eclipse
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Eclipse that play both.
Sigil of Sanctuary
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sigil of Sanctuary that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Electromagnetic Somersault (Blue) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Electromagnetic Somersault (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord Sutcliffe and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.