Annals of Sutcliffe
Runeblade Weapon - Book (2h)
Once per Turn Action -- {r}{r}{r}: Draw a card. If an attack action card and a 'non-attack' action card were pitched this way, create a Runechant token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.821.824346653
Average Defense Value:
2.552.553281065
Hero
Viserai, Rune Blood
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Vynnset
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Vynnset that play both.
Florian
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Florian that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Chane that play both.
Equipment
Grasp of the Arknight
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Face Purgatory
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Face Purgatory that play both.
Crown of Providence
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Crown of Providence that play both.
Aether Ironweave
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Well Grounded
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Well Grounded that play both.
Nullrune Boots
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Bloodied Oval
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Mage Master Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Runehold Release
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Runehold Release that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Balance of Justice that play both.
Carrion Husk
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Carrion Husk that play both.
Ebon Fold
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Ebon Fold that play both.
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcane Lantern
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Lightning Greaves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Weapon
Scepter of Pain
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Reaping Blade
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Reaping Blade that play both.
Flail of Agony
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Flail of Agony that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Nebula Blade that play both.
Dread Scythe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Dread Scythe that play both.
Rotwood Reaper
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Rotwood Reaper that play both.
Action
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.799516908
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Mordred Tide that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.862.861971831
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Become the Arknight that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.837748344
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.702702703
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
2.832.825000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Looming Doom that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
2.792.793103448
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Germinate that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played:
2.792.793103448
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.772.769230769
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.822.815668203
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.777777778
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.720000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.739130435
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.706185567
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.782.775641026
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Thistle Bloom - Life
Avg. played:
2.762.764705882
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Thistle Bloom - Life that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
2.592.591160221
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Rattle Bones that play both.
Runeblood Barrier
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Runeblood Barrier that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Funeral Moon that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.612903226
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Earth's Embrace that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and This Round's on Me that play both.
Sigil of Earth
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sigil of Earth that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Tome of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Tome of the Arknight that play both.
Bequest the Vast Beyond
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Bequest the Vast Beyond that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Condemn to Slaughter (Blue) that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Truce
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Truce that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Blessing of Occult (Yellow) that play both.
Read the Runes (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Read the Runes (Blue) that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.411764706
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Putrid Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sky Fire Lanterns (Red) that play both.
Diabolic Ultimatum
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Diabolic Ultimatum that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Arc Lightning that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Putrid Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Bloodspill Invocation (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
2.502.495412844
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
2.842.838541667
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.745098039
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
2.822.817679558
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Dread Triptych that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
2.802.800000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Plow Under that play both.
Snuff Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Snuff Out that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Spellblade Assault (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Vexing Malice that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
2.662.661971831
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Cryptic Crossing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Cryptic Crossing that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
2.702.696969697
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.692.686567164
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.625000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.706349206
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Deathly Duet (Red) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Deathly Duet (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.692307692
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.678571429
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.653846154
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.672.673469388
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.507936508
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.562.561403509
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Command and Conquer that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Splintering Deadwood (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Splintering Deadwood (Blue) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Deathly Delight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Deathly Delight (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.844387755
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.817120623
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.821428571
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.782.783333333
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.792452830
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.742.741258741
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Reduce to Runechant (Blue) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Rootbound Carapace (Blue) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and That All You Got? that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
2.762.761904762
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Oblivion that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Sanctuary
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Sigil of Sanctuary that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Annals of Sutcliffe and Arknight Shard that play both.