Drink 'Em Under the Table
Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Betsy Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Betsy.)
When this attacks a hero, you may wager with them. The winner draws a card, and the other hero discards a card. (When this chain link resolves, if this hit, you win, otherwise they win.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.794.785760967
Average Defense Value: Β
2.802.797454348
Hero
Betsy, Skin in the Game
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Betsy
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Betsy that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Good Time Chapeau
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Nullrune Boots
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Tectonic Plating
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Civic Steps
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Civic Steps that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Craterhoof
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Craterhoof that play both.
Nullrune Hood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Aurum Aegis
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crater Fist
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Crater Fist that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Stand Ground
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Stand Ground that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Titan's Fist that play both.
Flail of Agony
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Flail of Agony that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.812.805806759
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Tear Asunder that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.736595523
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746418338
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Buckle that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.682.675471698
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.702.703012912
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Double Down that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Imposing Visage that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.705061082
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Germinate that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Surface Shaking that play both.
Stamp Authority
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Stamp Authority that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Show Time! that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Nerves of Steel
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Nerves of Steel that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Truce that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Midas Touch that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Leave a Dent that play both.
Ice Eternal
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Ice Eternal that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Attack Action
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712476251
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Bet Big that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.802631579
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807044410
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807819383
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.805052169
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.798458150
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807007467
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Spinal Crush that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.802792321
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.805027174
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.682.683381924
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Command and Conquer that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.813370474
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.692686935
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Headbutt that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764912281
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.742.744099379
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.769032258
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.752673797
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.652.647331787
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.712.710743802
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Boulder Drop that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Thump (Red) that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and The Golden Son that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Crippling Crush that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Primed to Fight that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Endless Winter that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Star Struck that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Shake Down that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Crush Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.609098940
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Up the Ante that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.509615385
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.540106952
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.730542136
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729885057
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.722.724885845
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.742.735746606
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Test of Strength that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.534181240
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Drink 'Em Under the Table and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.
