Tooth and Claw
Mystic Ninja Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks, you may reveal any number of Crouching Tigers from your hand. If you reveal 1 or more, this gets go again. 2 or more, this gets +1{p}. 3 or more, draw a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.222.217514428
Average Defense Value: Β
2.672.667179087
Hero
Equipment
Tiger Stripe Shuko
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Tide Flippers
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Tide Flippers that play both.
Traverse the Universe
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Mask of Momentum
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Mask of Momentum that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Pouncing Paws
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcane Lantern
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Tearing Shuko
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Breaking Scales
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Breaking Scales that play both.
Weapon
Action
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.872.869757174
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.864093960
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.850335570
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.838048091
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
2.742.744923858
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.849358974
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727536232
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800203874
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.817660550
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Mindstate of Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.742.740237691
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Mindstate of Tiger that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Untamed (Red) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Predatory Streak (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Breed Anger (Blue) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Captain's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Captain's Call (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.862.857906799
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Chase the Tail that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.802.795269484
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.866394697
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.862.864661654
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
2.892.891551827
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.865435356
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Head Leads the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.832.825396825
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Head Leads the Tail that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.748437500
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.402.398541114
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Mauling Qi that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Growl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.810421286
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Growl (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.802.796812749
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Command and Conquer that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.758300133
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.162.155398587
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Qi Unleashed (Red) that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Companion of the Claw (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689788054
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
1.851.851250000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Salt the Wound that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Companion of the Claw (Blue) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.391.386416862
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Qi Unleashed (Blue) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.505208333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Tenacity that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Territorial Domain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Territorial Domain that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
98% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Stir the Pot that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.882.882183908
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Art of War that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Pass Over that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Snag
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tooth and Claw and Snag that play both.