Maul
Ninja Attack Reaction
Choose 1 or both;
Target attack action card with 1 or less base {p} gets +3{p}.
Target Crouching Tiger gets "When this hits, create 2 Crouching Tigers in your banished zone. You may play them this turn."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.232.232688791
Average Defense Value: Β
2.612.613800574
Hero
Benji, the Piercing Wind
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Equipment
Tiger Stripe Shuko
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Tide Flippers
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tide Flippers that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Mask of Momentum
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Pouncing Paws
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Traverse the Universe
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Okana Scar Wraps
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Tearing Shuko
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blood Scent
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Blood Scent that play both.
Old Knocker
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Old Knocker that play both.
Breaking Scales
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Breaking Scales that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.722.718502798
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800755754
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.660263761
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.659149723
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780341486
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.795279383
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
2.702.698800959
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.785516860
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.635346756
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
2.762.758210646
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Dual Threat that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β
2.582.581081081
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Untamed (Red) that play both.
Mindstate of Tiger
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Mindstate of Tiger that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
2.572.570203644
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Predatory Streak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Predatory Streak (Blue) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Breed Anger (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Breed Anger (Blue) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Predatory Streak (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.772.765550239
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Chase the Tail that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.712.709243999
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.792.793080207
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
2.832.825150124
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.822803195
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Seek Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Head Leads the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742271881
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Head Leads the Tail that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807397959
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711111111
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Enact Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Enact Vengeance that play both.
Vengeance Never Rests
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Vengeance Never Rests that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.769934641
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.678200692
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.542.541346449
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Mauling Qi that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800386660
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Growl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.726573110
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Growl (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.792.793241695
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Command and Conquer that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.756272401
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.002.002233140
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Salt the Wound that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.592592593
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Spring Tidings that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.032.030932818
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Qi Unleashed (Red) that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Double Strike that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.416666667
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Bittering Thorns (Blue) that play both.
Wander With Purpose
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Wander With Purpose that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pick Up the Point (Yellow) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pick Up the Point (Blue) that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Vipox
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Vipox that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Companion of the Claw (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.572.570206700
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.552.550847458
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Throw Dagger that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.792868380
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.731316726
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.582.582524272
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Territorial Domain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Territorial Domain that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.554781507
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pass Over that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.812.813075780
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Art of War that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Snag
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Snag that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.