Maul
Ninja Attack Reaction
Choose 1 or both;
Target attack action card with 1 or less base {p} gets +3{p}.
Target Crouching Tiger gets "When this hits, create 2 Crouching Tigers in your banished zone. You may play them this turn."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.232.226387780
Average Defense Value: Β
2.612.614611284
Hero
Benji, the Piercing Wind
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Equipment
Tiger Stripe Shuko
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Tide Flippers
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tide Flippers that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Mask of Momentum
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Pouncing Paws
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Traverse the Universe
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Old Knocker
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Old Knocker that play both.
Arcane Lantern
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Tearing Shuko
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blood Scent
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Blood Scent that play both.
Breaking Scales
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Breaking Scales that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Action
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.722.722814070
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.810820244
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666766288
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.661848612
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.803519062
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.775358733
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700916546
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790061418
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.637218045
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
2.762.762958649
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Dual Threat that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β
2.562.564102564
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Untamed (Red) that play both.
Mindstate of Tiger
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Mindstate of Tiger that play both.
Preach Modesty
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Preach Modesty that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
2.562.562060890
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Predatory Streak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Predatory Streak (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Breed Anger (Blue) that play both.
Amethyst Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Amethyst Amulet that play both.
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Predatory Streak (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.772.770717703
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Chase the Tail that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.722.715913336
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.802.797789795
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
2.832.833632126
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.828990826
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Head Leads the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745398773
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Head Leads the Tail that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.813064031
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
2.712.713581184
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.777137794
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.542.542682927
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Mauling Qi that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.682739060
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807425743
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Growl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.730994152
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Growl (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.792.793556086
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Command and Conquer that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750952986
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.001.997648166
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Salt the Wound that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.591985428
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Spring Tidings that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.042.037897928
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Qi Unleashed (Red) that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Double Strike that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pick Up the Point (Yellow) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pick Up the Point (Blue) that play both.
Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Wander With Purpose
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Wander With Purpose that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Companion of the Claw (Red) that play both.
Vipox
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Vipox that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Retrace the Past
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Retrace the Past that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Sea Legs that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Poisoned Blade (Blue) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Poisoned Blade (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.572.567547170
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Throw Dagger that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.462.457627119
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.801339286
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.731925784
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.522.521739130
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Territorial Domain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Territorial Domain that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.556097561
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Pass Over that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.812.812220566
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Art of War that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Snag
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Snag that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Maul and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.